PDA

View Full Version : No. To Kuchinich On Debates



Kathianne
01-15-2008, 09:02 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080116/ap_on_el_pr/kucinich_debate


Court allows MSNBC to bar Kucinich

By KEN RITTER, Associated Press Writer 12 minutes ago

The Nevada Supreme Court said Tuesday MSNBC can exclude Democratic presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich from a candidate debate.

Lawyers for NBC Universal Inc., had asked the high court to overturn a lower court order that the cable TV news network include the Ohio congressman or pull the plug on broadcasting the debate Tuesday night with Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards.

An hour before the debate, the state Supreme Court's unanimous order said that blocking the debate unless Kucinich got to participate would be "an unconstitutional prior restraint" on the news network's First Amendment rights. The justices also said the lower court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering Kucinich's participation even though he first requested and was denied relief from the Federal Communications Commission.

"It's a matter of being on stage and answering questions. That's the issue," lawyer Bill McGaha argued for Kucinich during a hearing before four justices in Las Vegas. Three other justices participated by closed-circuit video conference from Carson City.

Donald Campbell, a Las Vegas lawyer representing NBC Universal, accused Kucinich of trying to make a jurisdictional "end run" around the FCC and federal courts by suing in Nevada state court to be added to the debate.

FCC broadcast rules do not apply to cable TV networks, Campbell said, adding that forcing MSNBC to add Kucinich or not broadcast the debate amounted to prior restraint and would be a "clear and unequivocal" violation of First Amendment press freedom.

"Mr. Kucinich's claim ... undermines the wide journalistic freedoms enjoyed by news organizations under the First Amendment," Campbell said in his appeal.

Campbell said MSNBC decided to go with the top three candidates after the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries. Kucinich drew less than 2 percent of the Democratic vote in the New Hampshire primary, after attracting little support in the Iowa caucuses.

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:04 PM
They dont want him mentioning the recount in New Hampshire.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:05 PM
his wife is hot.....i want four years of that eye candy......

hjmick
01-15-2008, 09:05 PM
So inclusive these Democrats.

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:06 PM
It was the station not the party who did this.

Dilloduck
01-15-2008, 09:06 PM
They dont want him mentioning the recount in New Hampshire.

Like that will stop him ?????? :laugh2:

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:07 PM
It was the station not the party who did this.

so the station doesn't want him mentioning the recount?

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:08 PM
It will stop him from mentioning it on national TV if hes not on national TV.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:11 PM
It will stop him from mentioning it on national TV if hes not on national TV.

why does the tv station not want him to mention it?......you do know he has already been on national tv talking about it....

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:14 PM
You are aware more people watch the debates right?

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:17 PM
You are aware more people watch the debates right?

than what?.....but you still haven't told me why a TV station doesn't want him making news for them.....

hjmick
01-15-2008, 09:17 PM
It was the station not the party who did this.

And you don't believe that if the other candidates wanted him in the debate the network would not have acquiesced? MSNBC went to the Nevada Supreme Court to keep Kucinich out rather than except the lower court ruling and let him sit on the stage. Seems like great lengths to me.

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:18 PM
Yeah MSNBC really did not want him on the air for some reason.

Dilloduck
01-15-2008, 09:23 PM
Yeah MSNBC really did not want him on the air for some reason.

Do Republicans run that joint too?

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:26 PM
Yeah MSNBC really did not want him on the air for some reason.

maybe because he is a fringe candidate......and there are only really three dem candidates .... btw....msnbc is a network not a station......

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:29 PM
Do Republicans run that joint too?

No its a corporation so they own the current republican party.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:31 PM
No its a corporation so they own the current republican party.

msnbc owns the republican party? really......wow!

Dilloduck
01-15-2008, 09:35 PM
No its a corporation so they own the current republican party.

they DOOOOO ? wow

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:37 PM
No its a corporation so they own the current republican party.

msnbc owns the republican party? really......wow!

hjmick
01-15-2008, 09:41 PM
Yeah MSNBC really did not want him on the air for some reason.

Geez, the Republicans even let Ron Paul on the stage and he's nuttier than a pachyderm stool sample.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:42 PM
Geez, the Republicans even let Ron Paul on the stage and he's nuttier than a pachyderm stool sample.

he made the rest of them look pretty normal huh......

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:50 PM
Geez, the Republicans even let Ron Paul on the stage and he's nuttier than a pachyderm stool sample.


Hes not nutty hes just a libertarian through and through.

Look back to Goldwater and you will realise he is what your party used to stand for.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:53 PM
Hes not nutty hes just a libertarian through and through.

Look back to Goldwater and you will realise he is what your party used to stand for.

they are both loons.....i remmber when your party had class and style and morals.....but it has been 60 years since that happened

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:54 PM
No you just have no tolerance for differing opinions.

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:55 PM
No you just have no tolerance for differing opinions.

man is that an ironic claim.....

truthmatters
01-15-2008, 09:55 PM
they are both loons.....i remmber when your party had class and style and morals.....but it has been 60 years since that happened

What did you admire about the democratic party of thirty years ago?

manu1959
01-15-2008, 09:57 PM
What did you admire about the democratic party of thirty years ago?

the dems of the 70's......nothing

hjmick
01-15-2008, 09:59 PM
Hes not nutty hes just a libertarian through and through.

I know, I just like using the word "pachyderm." :D


Look back to Goldwater and you will realise he is what your party used to stand for.

It's not "my" party, per se. I do not restrict myself or my opinions to one political ideology. I registered Republican for the purpose of voting in the primaries and because there was a time when their fiscal and governing ideas were very closer to my own. Those are the issues most important to me, lower taxes, smaller government, strong military, stop illegal immigration. Imagine my disappointment.


:blowup:

REDWHITEBLUE2
01-16-2008, 10:19 PM
they are both loons..... there twins separated at birth :laugh2:

REDWHITEBLUE2
01-16-2008, 10:21 PM
No its a corporation so they own the current republican party. :lame2: your a Moron

manu1959
01-16-2008, 11:17 PM
:lame2: your a Moron

no shit....have i mentioned dennis' wife is hot and he should be president.....