PDA

View Full Version : Some folks shouldn't be voting



stephanie
01-27-2008, 06:24 AM
:cheers2:

Chuck Shiflett

Published January 26, 2008 11:05 PM CST

If any recent day typifies life in this crazy modern world, it was probably this past Tuesday. World financial markets were in a meltdown and the Federal Reserve held an emergency meeting to cut the interest rate a massive three quarters of a point in an attempt to stave off a precipitous stock market drop.

President Bush was working with congressional leaders on an economic stimulus package to reduce the likelihood of a recession. Meanwhile the U.S. presidential campaign was in full swing with Hillary and Obama having just ripped each other to shreds at a debate, and Fred Thompson announced that he was dropping out of the race on the GOP side.

Overseas Condi Rice was working diplomatic circles in an attempt to put more pressure on Iran and its burgeoning nuclear program. The nation of Israel had just reduced fuel supplies flowing into Palestinian territory in response to rocket attacks against Israel. In turn, Palestinians breached a security wall separating Gaza and Egypt.

It was a normal day in America's newsrooms; then the story broke that Heath Ledger had died. I racked my brain ... who the heck was Heath Ledger? I shouldn't have worried about finding the answer, because for the rest of the afternoon and evening all the important news was swept from the airwaves of CNN, Fox, and MSNBC as we were flooded with wall to wall coverage of yet another celebrity tragedy.

Dave Ramsey and two other prominent financial gurus were scheduled to appear on Larry King for a full 40 minutes to discuss the rapidly worsening financial situation. Sorry, guys ... some Hollywood type was diddling around with drugs and took a dirt nap. CNN will have to reschedule you so that we can bring viewers mind numbing ramblings on the life and times of Heath Ledger.

I hate it for the guy. Ledger was in the prime of his life and his movie career was headed higher. However, what should have been a 30-second news piece turned into a media feeding frenzy with every network trying to create a new angle in order to drag the story out. Is this what we've come too?

Are Republicans really ready to nominate a 72-year-old U.S. senator who has more in common with Democrat John Edwards than Ronald Reagan? Or have we swallowed his marketing mantra of "straight talk"?

Who cares what Barack Hussein Obama believes in? Oprah endorsed him and that's enough for millions of Democrats. Shouldn't we want to understand Hillary Rodham Clinton's socialist dream for America? Nah, the only thing that matters is that she's a woman.

I can't even count how many times a talk show host on our radio station has taken a call from a supporter of Obama or Hillary and then asked the caller to name one policy their candidate espouses. Usually there's dead silence ... and then a rambling answer about how he or she believes their candidate cares about people.

The caller was yet another victim of modern marketing that appeals to how we feel instead of to the facts surrounding an election. The odds are pretty high that the person standing in line behind you at your polling place on Feb. 5th won't have a clue.

Every election we hear the media types pontificate about how pitiful voter turnout is. I've been guilty of it myself. However I've about come to the conclusion we would better off as a nation if we discouraged voting. Do away with motor voter. No more voter registration drives.

It's easy to see why only property owners were allowed to vote in some colonies in the early days of this land. The powers that be understood that those with a vested interest would pay attention and cast their votes accordingly to protect our capitalist way of life.

read the rest..
http://www.daily-tribune.com/NF/omf/daily_tribune/viewpoint_story.html?rkey=0046278+cr=

Sitarro
01-27-2008, 06:43 AM
Outstanding article Steph, unfortunately he is 100% correct.

Classact
01-27-2008, 07:10 AM
90% of the Hispanic voters in Las Vegas were illegal Mexicans that voted for Clinton and the press doesn't care... the press gives them cover saying, oh they had to sign an affidavit so they can't be illegal... will they can sue you if you challenge them even if they are illegal so you can't challenge them.

What are we in for in CA? If an illegal can vote, a drunk on the street can vote, a person on welfare or in jail can vote ... with a wink and a blink a candidate can give you something for that vote... each illegal vote cancels out a producer citizen in the nation... each emotion vote cancels out a person that has researched the candidates... it sickens me.

stephanie
01-27-2008, 07:21 AM
If we can't all come together as one Nation....we will let the breakup of our Country go silently into the night...

I will cry........for my children...Not for me...I lived in the greatest Nation and lived free and it was wonderful.........

Now we have the Divided Nations of the United States...Joy for all that created this...:cheers2:

Joe Steel
01-27-2008, 07:32 AM
Chuck Shiflett

Published January 26, 2008 11:05 PM CST

If any recent day typifies life in this crazy modern world, it was probably this past Tuesday. World financial markets were in a meltdown and the Federal Reserve held an emergency meeting to cut the interest rate a massive three quarters of a point in an attempt to stave off a precipitous stock market drop.

...

Who cares what Barack Hussein Obama believes in? Oprah endorsed him and that's enough for millions of Democrats. Shouldn't we want to understand Hillary Rodham Clinton's socialist dream for America? Nah, the only thing that matters is that she's a woman.

I can't even count how many times a talk show host on our radio station has taken a call from a supporter of Obama or Hillary and then asked the caller to name one policy their candidate espouses. Usually there's dead silence ... and then a rambling answer about how he or she believes their candidate cares about people.

The caller was yet another victim of modern marketing that appeals to how we feel instead of to the facts surrounding an election. The odds are pretty high that the person standing in line behind you at your polling place on Feb. 5th won't have a clue.

Wingnuts are forever yammering about the distinction between a pure democracy and a republic. Well, this is what a republic is all about -- choosing someone just because you trust him and his judgment not because you want him to vote a certain way on certain issues.

stephanie
01-27-2008, 07:35 AM
Wingnuts are forever yammering about the distinction between a pure democracy and a republic. Well, this is what a republic is all about -- choosing someone just because you trust him and his judgment not because you want him to vote a certain way on certain issues.

Gezz...if I'm a wingnut...I'd glad I'm not known as a LEFT-NUT...:laugh2:

Hugh Lincoln
01-27-2008, 10:15 AM
Wingnuts are forever yammering about the distinction between a pure democracy and a republic.

Silly us.