PDA

View Full Version : John McCain funded by Soros since 2001



5stringJeff
02-13-2008, 08:26 PM
Look who's finding covert ways to receive campaign funds?? What a hypocrite McCain is. :mad:

So Arriana Huffington, George Soros, and Teresa Kerry are all supporting John McCain... why on earth would any conservative support him?!?

-------------
John McCain funded by Soros since 2001
Candidate's Reform Institute also accepted funds from Teresa Kerry
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

Kathianne
02-13-2008, 08:31 PM
Look who's finding covert ways to receive campaign funds?? What a hypocrite McCain is. :mad:

So Arriana Huffington, George Soros, and Teresa Kerry are all supporting John McCain... why on earth would any conservative support him?!?

-------------
John McCain funded by Soros since 2001
Candidate's Reform Institute also accepted funds from Teresa Kerry
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

Damn.

stephanie
02-13-2008, 08:41 PM
Yep...I've been reading more and more about this the last few days...

2001 is about the time McCain started selling out his conservative values...

Yurt
02-13-2008, 09:08 PM
NM probably got a warm feeling after reading this thread

CockySOB
02-13-2008, 09:10 PM
Damn. Just... DAMN!

avatar4321
02-13-2008, 09:34 PM
now how exactly does he expect us to just support him?

Kathianne
02-13-2008, 09:38 PM
now how exactly does he expect us to just support him?

yeah. I'm so down. As it was, would really have to hold my breath to vote for him. Now this. Damn.

avatar4321
02-13-2008, 10:07 PM
yeah. I'm so down. As it was, would really have to hold my breath to vote for him. Now this. Damn.

the thing is, I was willing to hold my breath and vote for him in the general for the sake of the troops, but this... it puts me back on i have no clue what im doing this november.

Dilloduck
02-13-2008, 10:10 PM
I've been telling ya it's rigged for months now !!!!!!! Why is everyone so shocked all of the sudden !!! We are NOT part of this election process.

5stringJeff
02-16-2008, 12:25 PM
The silence of McCain supporters in this thread is deafening.

chesswarsnow
02-16-2008, 01:15 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Then watch McCain ask *John SwiftBoat Kerry*, to be his VP.
2. They got to even the score some how.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

red states rule
02-16-2008, 01:54 PM
The silence of McCain supporters in this thread is deafening.


Ah, the sound of crickets chirping is wonderful

Calling NV - Calling NV

82Marine89
02-16-2008, 04:28 PM
NM probably got a warm feeling after reading this thread


The silence of McCain supporters in this thread is deafening.


Ah, the sound of crickets chirping is wonderful

Calling NV - Calling NV

He doesn't have the balls to respond to this thread.

5stringJeff
02-16-2008, 05:26 PM
He doesn't have the balls to respond to this thread.

You mean, he hasn't received his talking points yet.

actsnoblemartin
02-17-2008, 12:50 AM
I hate to play devils advocate

:lol:

but do you have any proof besides an article

Do you really want 1-2 justices being appointed by a democrat?

instead of mccain?

do you really want the economy being run by a democrat instead of mccain

mccain will lower taxes, democrats will raise them

mccain will not surrender in iraq

democrats will

If you dont want mccain fine, but know for all the bad youre getting with mccain, how much worse youll get it from the democrats and how long it will take to repair their damage to our country, if we can repair it at all.

JohnDoe
02-17-2008, 01:10 AM
The bottom line is that if you do not believe the candidate that your own party puts up as YOUR candidate represents you, an injustice is done if you vote for this person that was chosen for you by the bigwigs...or by those you differ with.

Some say that all this does is put the election in your opposition party's hand, by not going out and voting for who your party chose...

But i believe it is quite the opposite.

That it is the politicians that try to make us so AFRAID of the "other side's candidate" that it allows them to put up people as candidates that you don't agree with because they KNOW that they can get you to vote for them regardless.

I think those that have the balls to say, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and not follow their party by licking the rearend of the party's choice candidate who they dislike,are courageous and actually doing the RIGHT THING.... they are giving themselves MORE POWER in the future, to control and choose the candidate that most represents them. In other words, a party loss because you and a whole bunch of others, did not go out and vote for the loser your party put up, will make the Party think twice next time about you collectively, and your vote.

just voting for who they put up as a nominee or candidate for the fear of "the other guy" relinquishes your power imho.

jd

actsnoblemartin
02-17-2008, 01:19 AM
Very well thought out jd, i really enjoyed reading it, thanks for the intellectual challenge brother


The bottom line is that if you do not believe the candidate that your own party puts up as YOUR candidate represents you, an injustice is done if you vote for this person that was chosen for you by the bigwigs...or by those you differ with.

ME: an injusice was done the minute i realized tom tancredo wouldnt be the nominee.

Some say that all this does is put the election in your opposition party's hand, by not going out and voting for who your party chose...

But i believe it is quite the opposite.

That it is the politicians that try to make us so AFRAID of the "other side's candidate" that it allows them to put up people as candidates that you don't agree with because they KNOW that they can get you to vote for them regardless.

ME: but i believe mccain would be excellent for the economy

I think those that have the balls to say, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and not follow their party by licking the rearend of the party's choice candidate who they dislike,are courageous and actually doing the RIGHT THING.... they are giving themselves MORE POWER in the future, to control and choose the candidate that most represents them. In other words, a party loss because you and a whole bunch of others, did not go out and vote for the loser your party put up, will make the Party think twice next time about you collectively, and your vote.

ME: in some sense yes, but wont your country suffer, just so you can gain the candidate you like. In other words, I agree with you in theory, and i dont object to those who dont vote for mccain or any candidate based on principle, but their could be un-foreseen consequences, and perhaps, after a mccain win it would be easier to get a conservative we liked, while after a democrat winning, it might be harder. You never know

just voting for who they put up as a nominee or candidate for the fear of "the other guy" relinquishes your power imho.

ME: in some sense that is true, but we are not in a perfect world, and sadly it is what it is, but i completely respect your argument and position

jd

JackDaniels
02-17-2008, 02:03 PM
nevadamedic and the rest of the McCain herd are COWARDS, period. They are liberals supporting a liberal candidate.

Hobbit
02-17-2008, 02:23 PM
I think McCain is bad for the country. There, I said it. I think electing McCain would be only slightly less disastrous than electing a Democrat in the short term. In the long term, electing McCain, or even a sizable showing of conservatives on his side on election day, will tell the Republicans that their base will vote for whoever they put up, so they'll put up leftist candidates to win over the 'moderates,' and cause this country's political class to move further left, further towards higher taxes and spending, further towards socialism and fascism, and further towards the decline and collapse of our great republic.

Psychoblues
02-18-2008, 12:55 AM
John will make an excellent reich wing president. He had my vote in 2000. Otherwise, you got to suffer your own head bumps.

stephanie
02-18-2008, 04:15 AM
John will make an excellent Reich wing president. He had my vote in 2000. Otherwise, you got to suffer your own head bumps.


So if you think McCain will make a REICH WING President...

Then you will agree that Clinton and Bambam will make great Marxist, Stalinist Hilter type Presidents.........eh?????:cheers2:

-Cp
02-18-2008, 01:24 PM
Go figure... STILL no reply yet from McCain's girlfriend, NM.... :P

red states rule
02-19-2008, 06:02 AM
Go figure... STILL no reply yet from McCain's girlfriend, NM.... :P

Amazing isn't it?

Psychoblues
02-20-2008, 02:19 AM
How do you figure, staphy? Or is that just some more of your drunken outbursts with nothing whatsoever as reasoning for it?



So if you think McCain will make a REICH WING President...

Then you will agree that Clinton and Bambam will make great Marxist, Stalinist Hilter type Presidents.........eh?????:cheers2:

:cheers2::fu::pee::slap::dance::laugh2:

JackDaniels
02-20-2008, 04:14 PM
nevadamedic and the rest of the McCain fanboys have completely ignored these facts....what intellectual cowards.

Abbey Marie
02-20-2008, 04:32 PM
Soros supporting McCain? Well, isn't that a kick upside the head.

"Meet the new boss; same as the old boss..."

manu1959
02-20-2008, 05:23 PM
anyone read where he severed his ties with the group that was recieving funding in 06 .......

also what issues did mccain back that soros is in favour of .... i tried to find a nexus but was unable to find one .....

Black Lance
02-20-2008, 06:35 PM
That would be the immigration issue, most prominently. Soros prefers McCain to any other Republican candidate, and as such, if this story is true, is supporting his campaign financially. The obvious reason for this is that McCain is the most liberal of the current Republican candidates.

nevadamedic
02-20-2008, 06:44 PM
Look who's finding covert ways to receive campaign funds?? What a hypocrite McCain is. :mad:

So Arriana Huffington, George Soros, and Teresa Kerry are all supporting John McCain... why on earth would any conservative support him?!?

-------------
John McCain funded by Soros since 2001
Candidate's Reform Institute also accepted funds from Teresa Kerry
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

Teresa Heinz is a life long Conservative and long time friend of Senator McCain. She changed party offiliation during her husbands campaign to help his image. She is still a Conservative even if not in name and even if her husband is one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times.

Black Lance
02-20-2008, 06:46 PM
Teresa Heinz is a life long Conservative and long time friend of Senator McCain. She changed party offiliation during her husbands campaign to help his image. She is still a Conservative even if not in name and even if her husband is one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times.

If she is such a smart person, why did she marry "one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times"?

manu1959
02-20-2008, 06:57 PM
That would be the immigration issue, most prominently. Soros prefers McCain to any other Republican candidate, and as such, if this story is true, is supporting his campaign financially. The obvious reason for this is that McCain is the most liberal of the current Republican candidates.

soros was funding the reform institue

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

he wasn't funding mccain directly....

further you should read the goals of the reform institue....not all that wacky....

Yurt
02-20-2008, 08:14 PM
Teresa Heinz is a life long Conservative and long time friend of Senator McCain. She changed party offiliation during her husbands campaign to help his image. She is still a Conservative even if not in name and even if her husband is one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times.


obviously not....:poke:

JackDaniels
02-20-2008, 08:20 PM
obviously not....:poke:

LOL.

Obviously nevadamedic did NOT pay attention to the 2004 Presidential election...with all the stupid shit coming out of Teresa Kerry's mouth, no way she continued to be a conservative.

It just shows that nevadamedic has no skills in logic whatsoever...If Teresa is a Conservative, and she made a bunch of stupid liberal statements during the 2004 election, either way is irrelevant, because then she would be a liar, and not to be trusted.

Also, I find it incredibly ironic that nevadamedic could not do any better than that to defend McCain...what a gullible, uneducated fool.

JohnDoe
02-20-2008, 08:28 PM
yes, terresa Heinz kerry was a republican/conservative...though always a "moderate", her first husband john heinz was a republican senator, until he died in a plane crash in 1991.

Yurt
02-20-2008, 08:58 PM
LOL.

Obviously nevadamedic did NOT pay attention to the 2004 Presidential election...with all the stupid shit coming out of Teresa Kerry's mouth, no way she continued to be a conservative.

It just shows that nevadamedic has no skills in logic whatsoever...If Teresa is a Conservative, and she made a bunch of stupid liberal statements during the 2004 election, either way is irrelevant, because then she would be a liar, and not to be trusted.

Also, I find it incredibly ironic that nevadamedic could not do any better than that to defend McCain...what a gullible, uneducated fool.

:clap:

nevadamedic
02-20-2008, 09:10 PM
If she is such a smart person, why did she marry "one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times"?

She was desperate for love and affection.

5stringJeff
02-20-2008, 09:21 PM
Teresa Heinz is a life long Conservative and long time friend of Senator McCain. She changed party offiliation during her husbands campaign to help his image. She is still a Conservative even if not in name and even if her husband is one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times.


If she is such a smart person, why did she marry "one of the biggest pieces of shit of all times"?


She was desperate for love and affection.

Wow... did you get deleted off the McCain Talking Points mass e-mail list? The only desperate one around here is you, attempting to defend the indefensible.

Psychoblues
02-22-2008, 02:20 AM
Sooooo, that's why she married a Democrat?



She was desperate for love and affection.

I see them all the time. Republican women so vulnerable they will marry anything that will buy them a hot dog?!?!?!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

emmett
02-22-2008, 02:31 AM
the thing is, I was willing to hold my breath and vote for him in the general for the sake of the troops, but this... it puts me back on i have no clue what im doing this november.

Vote Lbertarian! What better time to send a message to our elected officials than now. If we could muster 5 million votes people would start to listen.

The truth is, we ARE Libertarians, most of us. We want complete and free speech. We want liberty, flat tax or some means of abolishing the IRS. We know SS is broken and know in our hearts we won't collect it. The War on Drugs is a waste of time and our SS money. We have so many God Damn laws we have to be attorney's to keep up with it.

It's the perfect time folks. You know you have always wanted to do it but you have said to yourself, "if I vote LP, I'll be wasting my vote". You know you have. Admit it, in your heart, you are a Libertarian. Ben Franklin was. James Madison, Monroe, Adams, all would today be considered extremists. Like we Libertarians are.

I am damn proud to be a card carrying Libertarian American. It sure would be nice if you had the balls to admit you are too.

Til Soon!

emmett
02-22-2008, 02:34 AM
Sooooo, that's why she married a Democrat?




I see them all the time. Republican women so vulnerable they will marry anything that will buy them a hot dog?!?!?!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

That is mean spirited Psycho, just plain mean. Funny though.

Psychoblues
02-22-2008, 02:39 AM
Humor was my objective, emmett. I'm glad you got it!!!!!!!!!!!!

emmett
02-22-2008, 02:46 AM
Humor was my objective, emmett. I'm glad you got it!!!!!!!!!!!!

Me too!

5stringJeff
02-22-2008, 09:12 AM
Vote Lbertarian! What better time to send a message to our elected officials than now. If we could muster 5 million votes people would start to listen.

The truth is, we ARE Libertarians, most of us. We want complete and free speech. We want liberty, flat tax or some means of abolishing the IRS. We know SS is broken and know in our hearts we won't collect it. The War on Drugs is a waste of time and our SS money. We have so many God Damn laws we have to be attorney's to keep up with it.

It's the perfect time folks. You know you have always wanted to do it but you have said to yourself, "if I vote LP, I'll be wasting my vote". You know you have. Admit it, in your heart, you are a Libertarian. Ben Franklin was. James Madison, Monroe, Adams, all would today be considered extremists. Like we Libertarians are.

I am damn proud to be a card carrying Libertarian American. It sure would be nice if you had the balls to admit you are too.

Til Soon!

:clap: :clap: :clap:

red states rule
02-23-2008, 06:26 AM
yes, terresa Heinz kerry was a republican/conservative...though always a "moderate", her first husband john heinz was a republican senator, until he died in a plane crash in 1991.

She was a Republican but far from a conservative. Now is she a pround member of the moonbat left - just like her hubby

JackDaniels
02-23-2008, 10:45 AM
Still no response about the content of the original post from nevadamedic...

Incredible...

red states rule
02-23-2008, 10:48 AM
Still no response about the content of the original post from nevadamedic...

Incredible...

Please do not tell me you are surprised by his sudden silence

Psychoblues
02-24-2008, 12:40 AM
Maybe, just maybe it's a nontruth and a non subject worthy of direct response?

Just guessing?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!??!

5stringJeff
02-24-2008, 02:28 PM
Maybe, just maybe it's a nontruth and a non subject worthy of direct response?

Just guessing?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!??!

It's a proven truth, and a subject worthy of discussion, given that McCain is the likely GOP nominee.

Pale Rider
02-24-2008, 03:52 PM
Sorry bout that,

1. Then watch McCain ask *John SwiftBoat Kerry*, to be his VP.
2. They got to even the score some how.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

He'll ask Joe Lieberman.

Pale Rider
02-24-2008, 10:12 PM
Look who's finding covert ways to receive campaign funds?? What a hypocrite McCain is. :mad:

So Arriana Huffington, George Soros, and Teresa Kerry are all supporting John McCain... why on earth would any conservative support him?!?

-------------
John McCain funded by Soros since 2001
Candidate's Reform Institute also accepted funds from Teresa Kerry
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

It's just astounding the amount of liberal ties one can dig up on mclame.

He turns my stomach, but that's nothing new. I knew he was a RINO years ago.

5stringJeff
02-24-2008, 10:19 PM
It's just astounding the amount of liberal ties one can dig up on mclame.

He turns my stomach, but that's nothing new. I knew he was a RINO years ago.

I am 90% sure I'm voting Libertarian this year.

Pale Rider
02-25-2008, 12:57 AM
I am 90% sure I'm voting Libertarian this year.

Likewise, or I'll write someone in.

red states rule
02-25-2008, 05:44 AM
Likewise, or I'll write someone in.

With Nader running, he may take enough votes away from Obama for McCain to slip in under the door

JackDaniels
02-26-2008, 01:06 AM
Still complete silence from nevadamedic....:laugh2:

Yurt
02-26-2008, 01:28 AM
Still complete silence from nevadamedic....:laugh2:

he's too busy being obsessed with trying to pwn me over my ribbing of gabs and my bedroom. you know those pre-school put downs probably tax him mentally :laugh2:

JackDaniels
02-28-2008, 03:01 PM
chirp...chirp...nevadamedic...chirp...chirp

Pale Rider
03-02-2008, 02:33 AM
chirp...chirp...nevadamedic...chirp...chirp

Maybe one of the two new mcamnesty campaign plants would like to say something for nm...

JackDaniels
03-06-2008, 11:08 PM
Maybe one of the two new mcamnesty campaign plants would like to say something for nm...

Can a SINGLE McLiberal supporter respond to these charges? I guess not.

5stringJeff
03-08-2008, 08:44 PM
What response could there be, besides, "Yup, it's true!"

Pale Rider
03-08-2008, 08:48 PM
What response could there be, besides, "Yup, it's true!"

Well not according to the Rev and PmP. According to them EVERYTHING that has posted so far about mcamnesty that has been DEROGATORY has been a LIE!

Amazing...

5stringJeff
03-08-2008, 09:05 PM
Well not according to the Rev and PmP. According to them EVERYTHING that has posted so far about mcamnesty that has been DEROGATORY has been a LIE!

Amazing...

I've been taking midterms, so I've been off the board for about a week, but as I peruse the latest threads, I see what you mean.

Pale Rider
03-08-2008, 09:11 PM
I've been taking midterms, so I've been off the board for about a week, but as I peruse the latest threads, I see what you mean.

Pertaining to post made with derogatory information on mccain....


you got that right....all that's missing is the truth.....


It is YOU that is the liar.... I am posting FACTS you are not.... Leave your fantasy world and join us in reality.