PDA

View Full Version : A Presidential Science Debate



Pale Rider
04-12-2008, 04:49 PM
I like this idea...



A Presidential Science Debate



Science Debate 2008 is the name of an effort to get the Presidential candidates to commit to discussing science issues before the election. Adam Hinterthuer reports.

Podcast Transcript: Hillary is undecided. Obama and McCain both passed. But the scientific community is committed to staging a candidates’ debate about science and technology. They want straight talk on political buzzwords like climate change and stem cells, as well as less discussed issues like funding for basic research and the National Institutes of Health. What started as citizens worried about the U.S. losing its edge is now a movement called Science Debate 2008.

An article in the current issue of the journal Science, claims that, by 2010, 90 percent of the world’s scientists and engineers will live in Asia, where research is well funded. The authors say the US needs to keep up because science and engineering drove half of America's economic growth over the last fifty years.

Article continues here... (http://www.sciam.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=3E266FAE-D9C3-DAB6-A69CA7D4A2FEE2B0&sc=rss)

midcan5
04-14-2008, 01:16 PM
Yikes, I am giving you positive rep points for that post, next thing you'll be a liberal funding education and supporting science. bravo.

Pale Rider
04-14-2008, 01:25 PM
Yikes, I am giving you positive rep points for that post, next thing you'll be a liberal funding education and supporting science. bravo.

Well, thanks for nothing, and since I'm real close to 53 and a life long conservative, your prediction is quite ridiculous.

Hagbard Celine
04-14-2008, 01:34 PM
I'd be interested in this debate.

avatar4321
04-14-2008, 01:54 PM
I wouldnt. we are talking John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama here. They arent scientists. They dont know a thing about science. They shouldnt be debating science. Especially since they will agree.

Why on earth do we want to watch politicians pander?

Pale Rider
04-14-2008, 02:24 PM
I wouldnt. we are talking John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama here. They arent scientists. They dont know a thing about science. They shouldnt be debating science. Especially since they will agree.

Why on earth do we want to watch politicians pander?

Well... I'm not a scientist either, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night... :laugh:

No, seriously, I'm very interested in science. Always have been. I've had a subscription to Popular Science for decades. I don't think it would hurt for Presidential candidates to let us know what they know about the latest science. Science IS our future.

Abbey Marie
04-14-2008, 02:38 PM
I would be curious to know where they stand on funding NASA/ space exploration. It is my experience that libs think it is a waste of money, preferring to spend anything we have on social programs.

Another difference between the traditional Dem party (a la JFK) and the far-left Socialist party we see today.

avatar4321
04-14-2008, 04:31 PM
Well... I'm not a scientist either, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night... :laugh:

No, seriously, I'm very interested in science. Always have been. I've had a subscription to Popular Science for decades. I don't think it would hurt for Presidential candidates to let us know what they know about the latest science. Science IS our future.

I disagree here. Freedom is our future. Science will be a byproduct.