PDA

View Full Version : Perpetual motion



Classact
04-18-2008, 08:03 AM
OK here is the question, why does the earth spin with such accuracy and what makes it spin? Why couldn't this perpetual motion be recreated in a smaller scale to produce energy?

Here is the best answer I have so far. http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/newton/askasci/1995/astron/AST050.HTM

manu1959
04-18-2008, 10:15 AM
you would need to create a frictionless vacuum for the perpetual engine to spin in.....take a physics class it is one of the experiments....or at least it was when i went to university 25 years ago....

Classact
04-18-2008, 10:50 AM
you would need to create a frictionless vacuum for the perpetual engine to spin in.....take a physics class it is one of the experiments....or at least it was when i went to university 25 years ago....With that in mind, couldn't a large generator be placed in space with an exact earth speed orbit that could generate power and change it into a laser beam directed to an earth receiver dish? I guess planes and birds would be toast that crossed the path but it seems like a green power machine that would create power for a single investment. I read that the earth rotation would speed up if it weren't for ocean tides, so if that is true then the generator could be controlled by a computer to control speed with resistance like a rheostat.

Hobbit
04-18-2008, 11:06 AM
You're forgetting the law of conservation of energy. If you set an object to spin in a frictionless vacuum with no opposing forces, it will spin forever, but to get it to produce, say, electricity, you must remove energy from the system, thus causing it to slow down.

The spin of the Earth isn't generating any power, so, by Newton's first law, it will continue to spin until such time as it is acted on by an outside force. If we attached a generator to its axis, we'd get quite a bit of electricity up until the day the Earth stopped spinning.

The reason tides affect the spin of the Earth has to do with torque equations. I can't remember torque right now, but the energy of a spinning system is directly proportional to its radius and revolutions per unit time. The tides increase the radius of the Earth. Since energy remains constant, this has a corresponding decrease in the rate of rotation. However, when the tide shifts, the changes cancel each other out and are too small to be noticed. In order to see this principle in action, there are 2 things you can do. The first is to sit in a rotating chair with one weight in each hand. Spread your arms out and then get a friend to start you spinning (or use your foot). Once you are spinning, pull your arms in and you'll notice that you start spinning 'faster.' The other way involves watching figure skating. Watch when one of the skaters is spinning with her leg outstretched, then watch as she pulls it in. She starts spinning really fast.

Monkeybone
04-18-2008, 11:50 AM
http://simulatedcomicproduct.com/2008/02/25/zimmer-wheel/


if the pic doesn't show up http://simulatedcomicproduct.com/2008/02/25/zimmer-wheel/

Hagbard Celine
04-18-2008, 11:58 AM
If you built a ring that spanned the perimeter of the Earth it could be engineered to spin along with the Earth using the Earth's own gravity. The spinning movement of the inner ring could be converted into energy. Probably enough to power the entire planet. It would be like using the Earth's own rotation to generate power. People could live and work on it. It could have vast hydroponic farms to produce food for the planet. Sounds like a good Will Smith movie.

glockmail
04-18-2008, 12:26 PM
If you built a ring that spanned the perimeter of the Earth it could be engineered to spin along with the Earth using the Earth's own gravity. The spinning movement of the inner ring could be converted into energy. Probably enough to power the entire planet. It would be like using the Earth's own rotation to generate power. People could live and work on it. It could have vast hydroponic farms to produce food for the planet. Sounds like a good Will Smith movie.
What provides the counter-resistance in space? Magic? :laugh2:

Monkeybone
04-18-2008, 12:47 PM
What provides the counter-resistance in space? Magic? :laugh2:

solar winds? could use expanding and retracting sails.

glockmail
04-18-2008, 01:04 PM
solar winds? could use expanding and retracting sails.
Looks like you've solved that problem.

What about the shade that this huge machine will impart on the earth? Shit you can't even grow a freaking redwood tree and shade someon's solar cell in California, so how could you build a giant hula-hoop around the globe? All that shade will then cool the earth, causing glaciation down to Texas, southern France, and Thailand.

Let's see you solve that problem, smarty pants.

Hobbit
04-18-2008, 01:42 PM
The ring thing wouldn't work. The Earth's gravity pulls objects towards itself, and a ring around the Earth would have net gravitation on it as a result of the Earth of zero. It would not spin. As has been said, the energy MUST come from somewhere and there is no magic bullet that will create energy from nothing. For every Joule gained by gravity moving something toward the Earth, a Joule must be spent moving it away again. For every Joule extracted from a spinning turbine, another Joule must be expended to keep it moving. We cannot create energy, only convert existing energy into more easily used types.

glockmail
04-18-2008, 03:36 PM
.... We cannot create energy, only convert existing energy into more easily used types.
Except through nuclear power.

Hobbit
04-18-2008, 03:47 PM
Except through nuclear power.

Incorrect, nuclear power converts the electromagnetic bonds between subatomic particles into heat energy.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power.htm

Hagbard Celine
04-18-2008, 03:51 PM
Incorrect, nuclear power converts the electromagnetic bonds between subatomic particles into heat energy.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power.htm

I think he was talking about nuclear fusion, which is science fiction at current.

glockmail
04-18-2008, 03:55 PM
Incorrect, nuclear power converts the electromagnetic bonds between subatomic particles into heat energy.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power.htm


I think he was talking about nuclear fusion, which is science fiction at current. I was talking about e=mc^2, where mass is converted to energy.

Fusion is current technology. It is what occurs in a hydrogen bomb. It just can't be controlled like fission at the moment.

Hagbard Celine
04-18-2008, 04:10 PM
I was talking about e=mc^2, where mass is converted to energy.

Fusion is current technology. It is what occurs in a hydrogen bomb. It just can't be controlled like fission at the moment.

I knew it was fusion or fission one. Whatever the sun does is what we need to find out how to do. Like in Spiderman 2.

Hobbit
04-18-2008, 04:34 PM
I was talking about e=mc^2, where mass is converted to energy.

Fusion is current technology. It is what occurs in a hydrogen bomb. It just can't be controlled like fission at the moment.

Yeah, once you get into relativity, though, you're still not creating energy. You're converting mass into energy, or perhaps it was already energy that somehow had mass. It's kinda fuzzy at that level.

glockmail
04-18-2008, 05:08 PM
I knew it was fusion or fission one. Whatever the sun does is what we need to find out how to do. Like in Spiderman 2. That would be fusion, and 30 years ago "they" were telling us that it was 40 years into the future. Now "they" are telling us it is 40 years into the future.

But in the meantime, we have 103 nuclear power plants in the US operating 24/7/365 near 100% capacity for decades, no deaths or injuries, no pollution, and no CO2, and the environmental whackos are telling us that its unsafe and we can't build any more.