PDA

View Full Version : Where is Murtha's Apology?



red states rule
06-18-2008, 11:52 AM
Motor Mouth Murtha rushed to hold a press conference when this story was breaking, and called our troops cold blooded killers

Now that another Marine has been found innocent, when will MUrtha adm it he was wrong?

Or is that asking to much of him?

The liberal media is not happy either. The Washingtopn Compost buried the story - yet it put the breaking story on the front page



WaPo Buried Haditha Dismissal, Gave One Paragraph to Acquittal
By Ken Shepherd | June 18, 2008 - 12:14 ET

Yesterday, charges against another Marine officer accused of involvement in the Haditha "massacre" were dismissed. Today's Washington Post printed a story, but it was from Los Angeles Times writer Tony Perry, not a Post staffer. What's more, Perry's 10-paragraph story was printed on page A10 below-the-fold. [Check here for Perry's article* at the Times Web site.]

At least that was nine paragraphs longer than the "Around the Nation" brief that the June 5 print edition of the Post ran to relay news of the acquittal of another Haditha Marine:

Marine Acquitted in Iraq Case

CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. -- A military jury acquitted Marine intelligence officer 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson of charges that he tried to help cover up the killings of 24 Iraqis in Haditha.


The Washington Post was not as shy when it came to giving readers front-page coverage of the allegations of a massacre. For example, on May 27, 2006, the Post Foreign Service's Ellen Knickmeyer landed a 1,921-word front-page article on the front page entitled, "In Haditha, Memories of a Massacre; Iraqi Townspeople Describe Slaying of 24 Civilians by Marines in Nov. 19 Incident"


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2008/06/18/wapo-buried-haditha-dismissal-gave-one-paragraph-acquittal

hjmick
06-18-2008, 12:09 PM
I hope you're not holding your breath. I wouldn't be waiting around for any of the members here at DP who were so quick to condemn the soldiers in question to apologize either.

red states rule
06-18-2008, 12:15 PM
I hope you're not holding your breath. I wouldn't be waiting around for any of the members here at DP who were so quick to condemn the soldiers in question to apologize either.

I never expect the kook left to do the right thing. They have such hate for Pres Bsuh, America, and our troops - the last thing they will ever admit is any good news that goes against their predetermined views

namvet
06-18-2008, 05:14 PM
Murtha's another reason to support term limitations. which I do.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 09:20 AM
Murtha's another reason to support term limitations. which I do.

The troops are fighting back against Murtha



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4w0gYqJN9U&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4w0gYqJN9U&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

glockmail
06-19-2008, 09:43 AM
The troops are fighting back against Murtha
...


I hope they personally bankrupt that asshole. :clap:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 09:45 AM
I hope they personally bankrupt that asshole. :clap:

Watch Murtha cut and run

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/b-ZLcrOvzJM&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/b-ZLcrOvzJM&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

namvet
06-19-2008, 09:48 AM
The troops are fighting back against Murtha



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4w0gYqJN9U&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4w0gYqJN9U&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

and murtha is a former marine officer. who served in vietnam

red states rule
06-19-2008, 09:51 AM
and murtha is a former marine officer. who served in vietnam

So what happened to his manhood? Where and when did he lose it?

namvet
06-19-2008, 09:55 AM
So what happened to his manhood? Where and when did he lose it?

ah i didn't serve with him.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 09:56 AM
ah i didn't serve with him.

Murtha is alot like John Kerry. Comes back and slimes the troops

Thank you for your service sir

namvet
06-19-2008, 09:58 AM
Murtha is alot like John Kerry. Comes back and slimes the troops

Thank you for your service sir

thank you. i think he came back with a pair but the dems wacked em off when he was elected.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 09:59 AM
thank you. i think he came back with a pair but the dems wacked em off when he was elected.

More like when they took over in 2006

Murtha is like my cat, ever since I had him neutered he has been a liberal

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:17 AM
More like when they took over in 2006

Murtha is like my cat, ever since I had him neutered he has been a liberal

and kerry he went to Nam without a pair. :laugh2:

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:24 AM
It's like a conservative circle jerk in here. :puke:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:25 AM
It's like a conservative circle jerk in here. :puke:

You do hate to see the type of "support" Dems show the troops, don't you?

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:28 AM
It's like a conservative circle jerk in here. :puke:

like an escort to the door????

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:29 AM
like an escort to the door????

Do not let it hit him in the ass on the way out :laugh2:

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:30 AM
You do hate to see the type of "support" Dems show the troops, don't you?

Honestly I know nothing about the case you're discussing or what Murtha said about it--and I could care less too. All I was commenting on was the back and forth backslapping session you and your cronies were having in here. :lol:

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:31 AM
Do not let it hit him in the ass on the way out :laugh2:

Huh, huh, yeah! Libs are bad! Huh, huh, huh, h-he-hu-huh. Duuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrr

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:32 AM
Honestly I know nothing about the case you're discussing or what Murtha said about it--and I could care less too. All I was commenting on was the back and forth backslapping session you and your cronies were having in here. :lol:

Of course you do not care. Since when do libs care about the troops and how they are treated by the kook left?

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:32 AM
Honestly I know nothing about the case you're discussing or what Murtha said about it--and I could care less too. All I was commenting on was the back and forth backslapping session you and your cronies were having in here. :lol:

so your joining the club. welcome.

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:35 AM
Of course you do not care. Since when do libs care about the troops and how they are treated by the kook left?

The "kook left" wants to increase their veterans' benefits and set-up the infrastructure to better care for their PTSD. All Republicans have done over the past eight years is cut their benefits and send them into and endless battle without body or vehicle armor.
http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/press/109th/3-17-05budget.htm

These facts won't sway you though. You've got your head so far up your ass that you'll probably never see the light of day again (shrug)

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:37 AM
The "kook left" wants to increase their veterans' benefits and set-up the infrastructure to better care for their PTSD. All Republicans have done over the past eight years is cut their benefits and send them into and endless battle without body or vehicle armor.
http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/press/109th/3-17-05budget.htm

These facts won't sway you though. You've got your head so far up your ass that you'll probably never see the light of day again (shrug)

You are no up on current events Hag

Dems caved on their surrender plans, and Republicans gave them their increase in vet benefits

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=15311

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:44 AM
You are no up on current events Hag

Dems caved on their surrender plans, and Republicans gave them their increase in vet benefits

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=15311

Yeah, after being forced to by the Dems.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/323569

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/us/politics/30web-hulse.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

You lose.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:45 AM
Yeah, after being forced to by the Dems.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/323569

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/us/politics/30web-hulse.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

You lose.


Forced by the Dems? Who the hell is running Congress these days?

Dems finally surrendered to Pres Bush since the troops are winning in Iraq. (Despite the Dems best efforts to smear and undermine the troops)

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:50 AM
The "kook left" wants to increase their veterans' benefits and set-up the infrastructure to better care for their PTSD. All Republicans have done over the past eight years is cut their benefits and send them into and endless battle without body or vehicle armor.
http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/press/109th/3-17-05budget.htm

These facts won't sway you though. You've got your head so far up your ass that you'll probably never see the light of day again (shrug)

the dems have a severe case of PTSD to. Power To Stop Democracy. :laugh2:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:51 AM
the dems have a severe case of PTSD to. Power To Stop Democracy. :laugh2:

More on Dems support the troops

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vLuMWiQ6r2o&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vLuMWiQ6r2o&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:53 AM
Forced by the Dems? Who the hell is running Congress these days?

Dems finally surrendered to Pres Bush since the troops are winning in Iraq. (Despite the Dems best efforts to smear and undermine the troops)

Yes, "forced by the Dems." The Dems run Congress, but only by a slim margin. They still need Republican votes to pass bills genius.
No, Bush finally got rid of the "stay the course" mantra he used for almost five years and reevaluated his military approach BECAUSE of Dem pressure to either change course or withdraw.

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:54 AM
More on Dems support the troops

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vLuMWiQ6r2o&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vLuMWiQ6r2o&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

and the troops replied with a sign. remember?????

red states rule
06-19-2008, 10:56 AM
Yes, "forced by the Dems." The Dems run Congress, but only by a slim margin. They still need Republican votes to pass bills genius.
No, Bush finally got rid of the "stay the course" mantra he used for almost five years and reevaluated his military approach BECAUSE of Dem pressure to either change course or withdraw.

Seems Dems are have changed course and are waving the white flag in the face of Pres Bush

Meanwhile, the kook left base is pissed off. Obama's buiddies in Hamas must be sad also today

I wonder if Harry "the war is lost" Reid will go with Obama to Iraq :laugh2:

hjmick
06-19-2008, 10:56 AM
and the troops replied with a sign. remember?????

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/hjmc3rd/irak.jpg

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:57 AM
Yes, "forced by the Dems." The Dems run Congress, but only by a slim margin. They still need Republican votes to pass bills genius.
No, Bush finally got rid of the "stay the course" mantra he used for almost five years and reevaluated his military approach BECAUSE of Dem pressure to either change course or withdraw.

withdraw. dems are issued white flags when sworn in................

namvet
06-19-2008, 10:59 AM
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/hjmc3rd/irak.jpg

classic

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 10:59 AM
withdraw. dems are issued white flags when sworn in................

There's nothing to surrender to tard. Our presence in Iraq is occupational and has been for the past four years.

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:00 AM
Seems Dems are have changed course and are waving the white flag in the face of Pres Bush

Meanwhile, the kook left base is pissed off. Obama's buiddies in Hamas must be sad also today

I wonder if Harry "the war is lost" Reid will go with Obama to Iraq :laugh2:

ah they don't know where Iraq is. send maps.

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:02 AM
There's nothing to surrender to tard. Our presence in Iraq is occupational and has been for the past four years.

dems alway carry white flags. re tard

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:02 AM
Seems Dems are have changed course and are waving the white flag in the face of Pres Bush

Meanwhile, the kook left base is pissed off. Obama's buiddies in Hamas must be sad also today

I wonder if Harry "the war is lost" Reid will go with Obama to Iraq :laugh2:

There is no "the left." It's a fantasy you've bought into from absorbing nothing but extremist right-wing media for the last decade.
And you're not fooling anybody by trying to pretend that Obama is "in cahoots" with Hamas or that he's gay or a Muslim or that his wife's a racist or that he's a communist or that he's un-American for not wearing a flag pin :rolleyes:. The basis of your dialogue here is and always will be baseless froth and weightless smears.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 11:03 AM
ah they don't know where Iraq is. send maps.

Libs will sit down with little Adolpf from Iran - but they have no interest in meeting the troops (until McCain forced Obama to agree to go to Iraq)

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:08 AM
Libs will sit down with little Adolpf from Iran - but they have no interest in meeting the troops (until McCain forced Obama to agree to go to Iraq)

What's your point? Is it that our leaders should waste time meeting with our own troops rather than the leaders of other nations? Specifically those we have bad relations with? :cuckoo:
And McCain hasn't forced anything. Obama already went to Iraq a couple years ago tard. The truth is that you're just copying McCain's campaign blather almost verbatim. Is it just too difficult to come up with your own opinion rsr?http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=3794382
Now you say he's going back? That's one time more than McCain has gone! :eek: Maybe McCain's a...Muslim sympathizer!!!! :eek:
God, you're such a mook rsr.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 11:10 AM
What's your point? Is it that our leaders should waste time meeting with our own troops rather than the leaders of other nations? Specifically those we have bad relations with? :cuckoo:
And McCain hasn't forced anything. Obama already went to Iraq a couple years ago tard. http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=3794382
Now you say he's going back? That's one time more than McCain has gone! :eek: Maybe McCain's a...Muslim sympathizer!!!! :eek:
God, you're such a mook rsr.

My, now meeting the troops is a waste of time?

Thanks for continuing to show the "support" the left is famous for Hag

More libs showing how they feel about US troops

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0anRyWT9nQg&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0anRyWT9nQg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:13 AM
My, now meeting the troops is a waste of time?

Thanks for continuing to show the "support" the left is famous for Hag

More libs showing how they feel about US troops

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0anRyWT9nQg&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0anRyWT9nQg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Your little "faux disapprovement" and innuendos aren't fooling anyone with a brain rsr.
What would be the point of "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders rsr? What possible advantage does "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders get for the US? Are you not going to be satisfied until Obama stands outside the head door and personally wipes the asses of every soldier who takes a sh*t? That certainly sounds like a job for the President of the United States rsr. Good call! :cuckoo:

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:13 AM
There is no "the left." It's a fantasy you've bought into from absorbing nothing but extremist right-wing media for the last decade.
And you're not fooling anybody by trying to pretend that Obama is "in cahoots" with Hamas or that he's gay or a Muslim or that his wife's a racist or that he's a communist or that he's un-American for not wearing a flag pin :rolleyes:. The basis of your dialogue here is and always will be baseless froth and weightless smears.

your right. Osama is in cahoots with power and money. other than that.........

hjmick
06-19-2008, 11:14 AM
Perhaps Murtha will feel compelled to issue an apology now:


Haditha Marine prepares to sue Murtha over smear
[i]Congressman had accused soldiers of killing 'in cold blood'[/b]
Posted: June 18, 2008
6:14 pm Eastern


With most of the eight Marines charged in the Haditha, Iraq, incident now exonerated, the highest-ranking officer among the accused is considering a lawsuit against Democratic Rep. John Murtha, who fueled the case by declaring the men cold-blooded killers.

In an interview with nationally syndicated radio talk host Michael Savage, the lead attorney for Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani said he and his client will look into suing Murtha and the Time magazine reporter, Tim McGuirk, who first published the accusations by Iraqi insurgents.

But the attorney, Brian Rooney, said nothing will happen immediately because he wants Chessani, described as a devout Christian and the father of six homeschooled children, completely "out of the woods" legally before any action is taken. The government, through Lt. Col. S.M. Sullivan, today filed a notice that it would appeal the case to the next judicial level.


Story... (http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=67434)

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:15 AM
your right. Osama is in cahoots with power and money. other than that.........

Yeah right. Tell me how much money Cheney earned from his Halliburton stock this year namvet. :rolleyes: What a joke.

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:16 AM
Your little "faux disapprovement" and innuendos aren't fooling anyone with a brain rsr.
What would be the point of "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders rsr? What possible advantage does "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders get for the US? Are you not going to be satisfied until Obama stands outside the head door and personally wipes the asses of every soldier who takes a sh*t? That certainly sounds like a job for the President of the United States rsr. Good call! :cuckoo:


Are you not going to be satisfied until Obama stands outside the head door and personally wipes the asses of every soldier who takes a sh*t?

he not worth anything else tard

red states rule
06-19-2008, 11:16 AM
Your little "faux disapprovement" and innuendos aren't fooling anyone with a brain rsr.
What would be the point of "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders rsr? What possible advantage does "meeting with the troops" over foreign leaders get for the US? Are you not going to be satisfied until Obama stands outside the head door and personally wipes the asses of every soldier who takes a sh*t? That certainly sounds like a job for the President of the United States rsr. Good call! :cuckoo:

I am sure the troops have more important things to do then to meet with a liberal moonbat who nothing but distain for them

So you do not have to go Hag, and neither does Obama

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:16 AM
he not worth anything else tard

That's where you're wrong boyo.

hjmick
06-19-2008, 11:17 AM
ah they don't know where Iraq is. send maps.


lj3iNxZ8Dww

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 11:18 AM
I am sure the troops have more important things to do then to meet with a liberal moonbat who nothing but distain for them

So you do not have to go Hag, and neither does Obama

Wow. Such cutting retorts! Such a rapier wit! :rolleyes:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 11:19 AM
Wow. Such cutting retorts! Such a rapier wit! :rolleyes:

and after your comments toward the troops, libs have the gall to whine their patriotism is being questioned

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:25 AM
What's your point? Is it that our leaders should waste time meeting with our own troops rather than the leaders of other nations? Specifically those we have bad relations with? :cuckoo:
And McCain hasn't forced anything. Obama already went to Iraq a couple years ago tard. The truth is that you're just copying McCain's campaign blather almost verbatim. Is it just too difficult to come up with your own opinion rsr?http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=3794382
Now you say he's going back? That's one time more than McCain has gone! :eek: Maybe McCain's a...Muslim sympathizer!!!! :eek:
God, you're such a mook rsr.


Obama already went to Iraq a couple years ago tard. so what has he done lately???? afraid he might see something he likes. 2 years ago. your an idiot. certified.

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:30 AM
That's where you're wrong boyo.

yes i am. this country now see's Osama is so full of SHIT the whites of his eyes are brown. girly man

crin63
06-19-2008, 11:36 AM
Murtha's another reason to support term limitations. which I do.

I'm torn on term limits. It would stop the monopoly of the 2 parties I think and would result in less corruption. On the other hand people should be able to vote for whoever they want to vote for. :dunno:

I'm leaning toward term limits though.

crin63
06-19-2008, 11:51 AM
If Murtha ever apologizes it will be either for political gain or financial preservation. I'm not going to hold my breath though.

namvet
06-19-2008, 11:55 AM
I'm torn on term limits. It would stop the monopoly of the 2 parties I think and would result in less corruption. On the other hand people should be able to vote for whoever they want to vote for. :dunno:

I'm leaning toward term limits though.

we have to get rid of these old bastards like murtha and ried. and the old GOP members as well. they live in the past. read books upside down. fall asleep at meetings. someone else has to do their voting. their way over due for retirement. we need younger politicans. ENOUGH !!! term limits. and many states are now enforcing it...........term limits (term limits)

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 12:24 PM
yes i am. this country now see's Osama is so full of SHIT the whites of his eyes are brown. girly man

Girly man? Okay. :rolleyes: Good one! Hyuck!

I don't know which "country" you're living in, but here in the US Obama is gathering quite the following. Not sure where you're getting your information, but you may want to change to a more realistic source. (shrug)

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 12:26 PM
so what has he done lately???? afraid he might see something he likes. 2 years ago. your an idiot. certified.

Uh seriously? Lately he won his party's nomination for POTUS. Last I checked, that was quite an accomplishment. Maybe it's not in La-La Land where you seem to live, but here in reality it still makes you the cat's pajamas.

Hagbard Celine
06-19-2008, 12:28 PM
and after your comments toward the troops, libs have the gall to whine their patriotism is being questioned

What of my comments? What have I said that is negative about military personnel?
Oh wait. The answer to that question is "nothing." As per the usual, you've just resorted to insinuating that I'm unpatriotic in the complete absence of any intelligent argument. :rolleyes: Pathetic as always.

Whoa! I don't have a "support the troops" magnet on my car! I must be in cahoots with Al-Qaeda!!! :eek:

What a joke. No wonder conservatism is dead.

red states rule
06-19-2008, 12:38 PM
Uh seriously? Lately he won his party's nomination for POTUS. Last I checked, that was quite an accomplishment. Maybe it's not in La-La Land where you seem to live, but here in reality it still makes you the cat's pajamas.

So what? Libs went for a black McGovern

glockmail
06-19-2008, 12:49 PM
So what? Libs went for a black McGovern
Jimmy Carter II. :laugh2:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 12:51 PM
Jimmy Carter II. :laugh2:

Yep, Obama is for the same failed policies of Pres Peanut. He wants to be Peanut's second term

actsnoblemartin
06-19-2008, 12:52 PM
I hate the lie of 47 million americans, but they dont say how 9 million of them are illegals


Yep, Obama is for the same failed policies of Pres Peanut. He wants to be Peanut's second term

namvet
06-19-2008, 01:01 PM
Girly man? Okay. :rolleyes: Good one! Hyuck!

I don't know which "country" you're living in, but here in the US Obama is gathering quite the following. Not sure where you're getting your information, but you may want to change to a more realistic source. (shrug)

well why are the muslims demanding an aplolgy????

red states rule
06-19-2008, 01:06 PM
well why are the muslims demanding an aplolgy????

They are one of many groups that walk around looking for things to be offended over

and Obama gave them something to bitch about on a silver platter

namvet
06-19-2008, 01:07 PM
Uh seriously? Lately he won his party's nomination for POTUS. Last I checked, that was quite an accomplishment. Maybe it's not in La-La Land where you seem to live, but here in reality it still makes you the cat's pajamas.


that was quite an accomplishment. say what Gracey???? 2 years ago. he does NOT want to see the accomplishments made over 2 years??? McCain invited him to go now. he passed. he always takes a powder. your 1/2 breed is trying to sell us on what he saw 2 years ago. and we're not buying it.

bullypulpit
06-19-2008, 05:52 PM
It's like a conservative circle jerk in here. :puke:

Looks like Red's the pivot man. :laugh2:

red states rule
06-19-2008, 06:21 PM
Looks like Red's the pivot man. :laugh2:

If by that you mean when left wing nuts toss out the smears and insults toward the troops - and I call them on it - you finally said something that is correct

Libs like you who claim to support the troops never seem to be bothered by Dems who attack the men an women in the US military