PDA

View Full Version : Ford v. Carter? Some Advice for McCain



Kathianne
07-19-2008, 08:58 AM
I just saw this, I think there's a lot of common sense advice that would be well heeded:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NGI5NjRkZmJmMTJhYjVmMGU0ZWUwNGJiNzU4ODM4MmQ=


1976 Revisited
McCain needs to run a "turn the corner" campaign.

By Michael Barone

Looking back over the last 40 years, the presidential campaign that most closely resembles this year's is the contest between Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter in 1976. The Republicans were the incumbent presidential party that year, as they are now, but the Democrats had a big advantage in party identification — on the order of 49 percent to 26 percent then, far more than today.

The Republican president who had been elected and re-elected in the last two campaigns, Richard Nixon, had dismal favorability ratings, far lower than George W. Bush's. His name could scarcely be mentioned at the Republican National Convention. The Democratic nominee was a little-known outsider, with an appeal that was based on the idea that he could transcend the nation's racial divisions. Jimmy Carter, a governor from the Deep South, had placed a portrait of Martin Luther King Jr. in the state Capitol in Atlanta.

Ford's political situation then was far more parlous than McCain's today. An early summer Gallup poll showed him trailing Carter by 62 percent to 29 percent. He had barely limped through the primary contests against Ronald Reagan, who continued his campaign up through the mid-August national convention. His political ads had been disastrous, and on Aug. 1 he did not have a general election media team in place.

Yet by November, the race was about even. Ford ended up losing by just 50 percent to 48 percent. A switch of 5,559 votes in Ohio and 3,687 in Hawaii — 9,247 votes out of 81 million — would have made Ford president for four more years. ...

Kathianne
07-19-2008, 09:27 AM
Some related examples:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/17/AR2008071701839.html?hpid=opinionsbox1


...Americans are beginning to notice Obama's elevated opinion of himself. There's nothing new about narcissism in politics. Every senator looks in the mirror and sees a president. Nonetheless, has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?

Obama is a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name, a former Illinois state senator who voted "present" nearly 130 times. As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, has he ever produced a single notable piece of scholarship? Written a single memorable article? His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: himself.

It is a subject upon which he can dilate effortlessly. In his victory speech upon winning the nomination, Obama declared it a great turning point in history -- "generations from now we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment" -- when, among other wonders, "the rise of the oceans began to slow." As Hudson Institute economist Irwin Stelzer noted in his London Daily Telegraph column, "Moses made the waters recede, but he had help." Obama apparently works alone.

...

Abbey Marie
07-19-2008, 09:43 AM
Ford's political situation then was far more parlous than McCain's today.

Intersting comparison, Kath. In superficial ways, it's hard to see any likeness between Carter and Obama. But politically, yup.

Also, I had never heard the word "parlous" before. Apparently, it's a synonym for "perilous". To my northern ears, it sounds like a sort of southern pronunciation of perilous. Love to learn a new word. :salute:

Joe Steel
07-19-2008, 12:15 PM
"By Michael Barone"

Michael Barone!

A hack.

Dismissed.

Gaffer
07-19-2008, 01:13 PM
"By Michael Barone"

Michael Barone!

A hack.

Dismissed.

joe steel

a fool

dissed.

5stringJeff
07-19-2008, 04:25 PM
I just saw this, I think there's a lot of common sense advice that would be well heeded:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NGI5NjRkZmJmMTJhYjVmMGU0ZWUwNGJiNzU4ODM4MmQ=

Great article. As soon as I saw the thread title, I was in complete agreement.