PDA

View Full Version : San Francisco Wants US Department of Peace



stephanie
03-15-2007, 11:45 PM
A mere 8 billion dollars of our money is nothing to a stinking Politician..Look who's sponsoring the bill..........ALL DEMOCRATS

:rolleyes:

By unanimous vote the San Francisco Board of Supervisors endorses legislation to establish a U.S. Department of Peace and Nonviolence
San Francisco , CA. - San Francisco joined the Bay Area cities of Berkeley, Oakland, Palo Alto and San Jose yesterday when its Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a resolution endorsing creation of a cabinet-level U.S. Department of Peace and Nonviolence. By doing so, this sixth-largest metropolitan area in the country (encompassing some 5.4 million residents) joined the ranks of 20 cities voicing support for HR 808, legislation that focuses on innovative and proactive approaches to violence prevention.

"We have to remind elected officials of all parties that peace is patriotic...." said HR 808 co-sponsor Rep. Barbara Lee after the bill was reintroduced in Congress on February 5th. "If we had a Department of Peace, we'd be dealing in a real way with gun violence, and domestic violence, child abuse, elder abuse, and all the awful violence that's taking place because of the cutbacks of funding and disinvestment in the American people. In the words of the great warrior for peace Dr. Martin Luther King, peace is not just the absence of tension, it is the presence of justice. A Department of Peace would embody that ideal."

According to the resolution, introduced by board member Michela Alioto-Pier, the city would benefit from a U.S Department of Peace in many ways, including "...development of conflict resolution and violence prevention initiatives..." and by funding already existing programs aimed at reducing crimes such as domestic violence, school shootings and gang violence.

Attending yesterday's vote was Bay Area resident Judy Kimmel, Outreach and Development Director for The Peace Alliance, the citizen action organization spearheading the national campaign for a U.S. Department of Peace. "The Board of Supervisors' vote endorsing creation of a U.S. Department of Peace was heartfelt and inspiring, and represents the final keystone uniting the entire Bay Area in a call for a federally-lead comprehensive, proactive and sophisticated approach to stopping violence in our community before it erupts."

"We recently read in many major newspapers that violent crime in cities in surging," said Dot Maver, Executive Director of The Peace Alliance. "For a tiny slice of our discretionary spending ($8 billion, or less than one percent of the U.S. budget), we can significantly reduce violence in our homes, in our schools, in our communities, our nation, and throughout the world. Cities around the country are recognizing the practical value of this legislation. People of every political persuasion want a U.S. Department of Peace and are willing to work for it."

Domestically the department will research, propose and facilitate practical, field-tested solutions to reduce conflict, providing financial and institutional heft to strengthen and complement our current efforts to deal with all forms of domestic violence and discord. And it will help develop curricula to educate students in grades K-12 on how to resolve conflict peacefully through peer mediation, and training in alternative dispute resolution techniques and non-violent communication skills.

Internationally, a Department of Peace will advise the president and Congress on the most innovative techniques to establish and promote peace among nations, and will research and analyze the root causes of war to help prevent conflicts from escalating to the point of violence.

It will create a Peace Academy, on par with the Military Service Academies, to build a world-class faculty of peace-building experts, many of whom currently live in the United States. They will analyze peace-building at the highest level, advise other branches of government, and train civilian peacekeepers and the military for domestic and international service.

House Resolution 808 currently enjoys the support of 60 Congressional co-sponsors, including Rep. Susan A. Davis [CA-53-D, Rep. Sam Farr, [CA-17-D], Rep. Bob Filner, [CA-51-D], Rep. Michael M. Honda, [CA-15-D], Rep. Barbara Lee, [CA-9-D], Rep. George Miller, [CA-7-D], Rep. Brad Sherman, [CA-27-D], Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher, [CA-10-D], Rep. Maxine Waters, [CA-35-D], Rep. Diane E. Watson, [CA-33-D], and Rep. Lynn C. Woolsey, [CA-6-D].

The Peace Alliance is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization spearheading the national campaign for a U.S. Department of Peace and Nonviolence. For more information on this legislation and our campaign, please visit the Peace Alliance website at: www.thepeacealliance.org.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20070314191948nnnn.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.html

Hobbit
03-16-2007, 01:02 AM
8 billion dollars on what? How much money does it take to form a department whose stated purpose is to NOT do something?

CSM
03-16-2007, 07:32 AM
8 billion dollars on what? How much money does it take to form a department whose stated purpose is to NOT do something?

Seems like another form of welfare to me...pay a bunch of do-nothings to stay home, watch tv and whine (with bonuses if they get bussed to an anti-war rally).

GW in Ohio
03-16-2007, 08:04 AM
Yeah, we don't need no stinkin' Department of Peace.

Sounds vaguely wimpy to me........

:salute: :cool: :salute:

CSM
03-16-2007, 08:33 AM
Yeah, we don't need no stinkin' Department of Peace.

Sounds vaguely wimpy to me........

:salute: :cool: :salute:

Not wimp but it sure sounds like a HUGE waste of money. I can just see the cash being funneled away much like it is when we send money to the UN. Of course, such a department would eventually become another anti-US political tool just like the UN.

Besides, we already have a Peace Corps....give the money to them instead.

Gaffer
03-16-2007, 09:30 PM
What exactly would this department do? Aside from being another beaucratic waste.

CSM
03-16-2007, 09:31 PM
What exactly would this department do? Aside from being another beaucratic waste.

This department would.... well, it would.....ummmm.....errrr.....

Gaffer
03-16-2007, 10:11 PM
This department would.... well, it would.....ummmm.....errrr.....

:lol: That's what I thought.

avatar4321
03-17-2007, 02:29 AM
This is nothing new. We already have a Department of peace. Its called the Department of Defense. They ensure we have peace in this world by killing our enemies.

stephanie
03-17-2007, 02:58 AM
This is nothing new. We already have a Department of peace. Its called the Department of Defense. They ensure we have peace in this world by killing our enemies.

Exactly..

KarlMarx
03-17-2007, 09:00 AM
We should call it the Department of Bullshit instead, let's just be honest about it. The Department of Bullshit, Smoke, Mirrors, Waste, Fraud and Abuse, to be even more honest.

We have several departments of peace already. In fact, except for the Department of Defense, all other cabinet positions are relevant to peaceful pursuits.

Congress is playing politics during a time of national struggle, proposing more spending when we cannot afford it. They play politics when we are locked in a struggle for our nation's survival. In short, there is a crisis looming.

It is past time for the Executive Branch to investigate Congress. Congress has overstepped its Constitutional authority on just about everything.

They insist on running the war, when the Constiution clearly gives that authority to the Executive.

It is common sense that wars cannot be run by committees and public opinion. Since Vietnam, that is exactly how we have been fighting wars, though.

The first Iraq conflict was the exception but that was because it was too short a conflict for Congress to make an issue.

Congress insists on overseeing every minutia of the Executive Branch, but no one looks over their shoulder.

The Executive Branch has the Department of Justice reporting to it, it's time to put a microscope up every Congressman's and Senator's ass. I'd like to volunteer those two vultures that supposedly represent me in Congress. The Honorable Asswipes Schumer and Clinton.

I think it is time to have a Constitutional Amendment that will require a balanced budget each year unless during times of national emergency. I also think it is past time for Congress's powers be limited to the powers granted it by the Constitution.

The politicians in Congress learned a lesson from Watergate. Create an appearance of wrong doing in the Executive Branch, have a show trial, cash in big on political points.

They also learned to create problems where there are none, make mountains out of molehills and get the voters to believe it. That way they can spend their way into the hearts and minds of the voters. Nevermind that the voters are paying the bills, just so long as the politicians win

manu1959
03-17-2007, 11:26 AM
this is the same group of people that could not approve.....

a mixed use multi family housing project with a cultural center and 20% affordable housing included..... it was to be built in an historic building that had been vacant for 20 years located in a low income latin neighborhood........instead because they kept denying the project......the owners sold the building to a s+m porn film company

Gunny
03-17-2007, 11:37 AM
This department would.... well, it would.....ummmm.....errrr.....

cave in on a moment's notice?:cheers2:

KarlMarx
03-17-2007, 11:56 AM
You want a Department of Peace? OK, let's create a Department of Whacking Assholes who run countries... I propose Tony Soprano as the Secretary of Whacking.

Let's create a department to assasinate Hugo (to Hell) Chavez, Fidel C-ASS-tro, Kim Il Jung ("shorty"), WTF his name in Iran, you know, the asshole with the name no one knows how to pronounce, and the Syrian fucker, Bashar Assad (what kind of name is Bashar? His father named him after one of Santa's reindeer?), oh and let's not forget the Palestinian Mafia while we're at it.

The total budget might be a few dozen pistols, some ammo and plane tickets to Caraccas, Havana, Pyong Yang, Tehran and Damascus and wherever the fuck the Palestinians have their rathole capital. Plus a few million to pay the assassins to do their jobs.

What a freaking bargain it would be if we only did it like that.

Gunny
03-17-2007, 11:59 AM
You want a Department of Peace? OK, let's create a Department of Whacking Assholes who run countries... I propose Tony Soprano as the Secretary of Whacking.

Let's create a department to assasinate Hugo (to Hell) Chavez, Fidel C-ASS-tro, Kim Il Jung ("shorty"), WTF his name in Iran, you know, the asshole with the name no one knows how to pronounce, and the Syrian fucker, Bashar Assad (what kind of name is Bashar? His father named him after one of Santa's reindeer?), oh and let's not forget the Palestinian Mafia while we're at it.

The total budget might be a few dozen pistols, some ammo and plane tickets to Caraccas, Havana, Pyong Yang, Tehran and Damascus and wherever the fuck the Palestinians have their rathole capital. Plus a few million to pay the assassins to do their jobs.

What a freaking bargain it would be if we only did it like that.

I think they just spelled it wrong. SFer's want a "Department of PIECE," so that even every fat ugly guy can get some.

manu1959
03-17-2007, 12:03 PM
I think they just spelled it wrong. SFer's want a "Department of PIECE," so that even every fat ugly guy can get some.

no need that is what the castro distict is for.....

krisy
03-17-2007, 12:48 PM
What exactly would this department do? Aside from being another beaucratic waste.


That's all it would be,nothing else.

It never ceases to amaze me the absolute ignorance of Congress. Geese,is this stupid.

First this beaucracy would teach everyone how wrong it is to beat your wife and mug up 101 year old women,then they would teach world leaders the phrase..."can't we all just get along?"



Aabsolute nonsense.