Mrs. Wasilla Dumber Than Shit

[OCA]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gk8moOxzlGQ

LMFAO!:laugh2::laugh2:

My stripper's stage name last night was Sarah Palin lol.

[Yurt]

she better bone up on public speaking or she is going to get smacked down in her debate with joey

[retiredman]

she better bone up on public speaking or she is going to get smacked down in her debate with joey

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

[OCA]

she better bone up on public speaking or she is going to get smacked down in her debate with joey

Yurt, I don't think its just public speaking she needs, she doesn't know jack about the issues. She is going to get destroyed Thursday and be the final nail in Johnny Lib's coffin.

[Yurt]

Yurt, I don't think its just public speaking she needs, she doesn't know jack about the issues. She is going to get destroyed Thursday and be the final nail in Johnny Lib's coffin.

you might be right, if she does bad, it will be very bad news for mccain...

[Yurt]

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

:dance:

[retiredman]

If she can't hold her own against Couric, Biden will chew her apart...and Gwen will help.

[WWW]

The same morons spewing the same shit as they did whey Reagan emerged. Energy is the issue, and has been since the democrat Carter installed the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in Persia. Palin is the only one in the bunch who knows her head from her ass regarding energy policy. Weaning ourselves off the poison that is being sold to us by our enemies is the signal political challenge of the age. President Palin will eventually be the one to slay this debilitating addiction.

Eat shit and die to all socialist stooges and fellow travelers.
:fu:

[krisy]

If you watch the interview Palin did with Sean Hannity can see that it's not a problem with public speaking,but a problem with nerves. When Hannity interviewed her,she was great and clearly relaxed......most probably because she knew he wasn't out to get her,he is after all on her side. To put it simply,Couric and Gibson are not,and I think she is a bundle of nerves when doing these interviews for the mainstream lib media.

Yes ,she is going to have to learn how to handle these morons,and I believe she will. SHe is by no means dumber than shit and has a lot to offer her country,just like she has her state.

[retiredman]

If you watch the interview Palin did with Sean Hannity can see that it's not a problem with public speaking,but a problem with nerves. When Hannity interviewed her,she was great and clearly relaxed......most probably because she knew he wasn't out to get her,he is after all on her side. To put it simply,Couric and Gibson are not,and I think she is a bundle of nerves when doing these interviews for the mainstream lib media.

Yes ,she is going to have to learn how to handle these morons,and I believe she will. SHe is by no means dumber than shit and has a lot to offer her country,just like she has her state.

She'd better learn quickly.... Biden and Ifill are on the agenda for this Thursday!:laugh2:

maybe a valium or a quaalude would help.

[red states rule]

She'd better learn quickly.... Biden and Ifill are on the agenda for this Thursday!:laugh2:

maybe a valium or a quaalude would help.

This is the second time you admitted the moderator has an agenda. Thanks for admitting the liberal media bias

[krisy]

She'd better learn quickly.... Biden and Ifill are on the agenda for this Thursday!:laugh2:

maybe a valium or a quaalude would help.

I'm not so sure that she will be as nervous with Biden,he isn't the media that can make or break her.

Biden hasn't exactly been a master of words as of late....have you been watching the news?.......Hillary would have been a better choice than him......the Obama ad against McCain that Biden said was terrible :laugh2:

He isn't exactly rackin up votes for his side with some of his comments,which supposedly he has a long history of making without thinking. At least Palin doesn't pick on her own campaign.....:laugh2:

[red states rule]

I'm not so sure that she will be as nervous with Biden,he isn't the media that can make or break her.

Biden hasn't exactly been a master of words as of late....have you been watching the news?.......Hillary would have been a better choice than him......the Obama ad against McCain that Biden said was terrible :laugh2:

He isn't exactly rackin up votes for his side with some of his comments,which supposedly he has a long history of making without thinking. At least Palin doesn't pick on her own campaign.....:laugh2:

How many gaffes will Biden make during the debate. He is good for at least one per day it seems

[retiredman]

I'm not so sure that she will be as nervous with Biden,he isn't the media that can make or break her.

Biden hasn't exactly been a master of words as of late....have you been watching the news?.......Hillary would have been a better choice than him......the Obama ad against McCain that Biden said was terrible :laugh2:

He isn't exactly rackin up votes for his side with some of his comments,which supposedly he has a long history of making without thinking. At least Palin doesn't pick on her own campaign.....:laugh2:


His command of the issues will quickly expose the shallowness of hers, IMHO

[Mr. P]

As Chuck Todd said at the end of the video she's been sheltered to much by the campaign. I agree, and I was disappointed to see she didn't follow up the debate last night but Biden did for the dims...for the GOP Gulliani? Wuz with that? Not good. IMO.

Hey, maybe it will be Palin that gets ill soon and withdraws..???

[WWW]

Dream on Dude, Palin is gonna rip off Biden's heads with aplomb and style, just like she did with the Old Guard Republicans in Alaska, and just like she did to Baroma with her acceptance speech. You're looking down the barrel of 12 more years of a republican presidency, and if you think Bush Derangement Syndrome was a bummer, wait 'till you come down with P.D.S. You are so gonna be hurt'n.

[WWW]

If she can't hold her own against Couric, Biden will chew her apart...and Gwen will help.
Dream on Dude, Palin is going to rip Biden's heads off in this debate; just like she did to the Old Guard GOP in Alaska, and just like she did to Baroma during her acceptance speech. Your looking down the barrel of twelve more years of a republican presidency, and if you think Bush Derangement Syndrome was a downer, wait till you get a load of P.D.S.
You are so gonna be suck'n. Too bad Canada has started to tighten up her residency requirements, no?

[Sitarro]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gk8moOxzlGQ

LMFAO!:laugh2::laugh2:

My stripper's stage name last night was Sarah Palin lol.

OCA, You're wasting time in strip clubs watching lesbians take advantage of idiot boys and you are saying Palin is dumb??????? That's rich.

[retiredman]

Dream on Dude, Palin is going to rip Biden's heads off in this debate; just like she did to the Old Guard GOP in Alaska, and just like she did to Baroma during her acceptance speech. Your looking down the barrel of twelve more years of a republican presidency, and if you think Bush Derangement Syndrome was a downer, wait till you get a load of P.D.S.
You are so gonna be suck'n. Too bad Canada has started to tighten up her residency requirements, no?


Canada? who the hell would ever move there?:laugh2:


I guess we'll see fairly soon who will rip whom.... we only have a few days left before the event!

[namvet]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gk8moOxzlGQ

LMFAO!:laugh2::laugh2:

My stripper's stage name last night was Sarah Palin lol.

no your the dumbass. Russian bombers over flew Alaska during the cold war on spy missions. they'll do it again. clearly your history challenged.
you have a stripper???? whats his name ???

[namvet]

Yurt, I don't think its just public speaking she needs, she doesn't know jack about the issues. She is going to get destroyed Thursday and be the final nail in Johnny Lib's coffin.

she won't have to debate this dip shit. he'll have his foot in his mouth all night. he's been diagnosed with hoof and mouth disease. amoung other ailments.

but we're more interested in your stripper.

[Gaffer]

Anyone consider they may be keeping her under wraps for a reason and they will turn her loose during the debate. I have a feeling it will be a much more interesting debate than anyone is expecting. And a lot of Palin haters and biden lovers are going to be disappointed.

It's not a bias reporter interview. She will be debating biden. And he will have to respond to her as well as she to him.

I see a lot of chicken counting here before the eggs have hatched.

[retiredman]

Anyone consider they may be keeping her under wraps for a reason and they will turn her loose during the debate. I have a feeling it will be a much more interesting debate than anyone is expecting. And a lot of Palin haters and biden lovers are going to be disappointed.

It's not a bias reporter interview. She will be debating biden. And he will have to respond to her as well as she to him.

I see a lot of chicken counting here before the eggs have hatched.

on both sides... and the format of the debate is much more structured than the format of the presidential debates. She will never be responding to him or he to her... both of them will be responding to Gwen Ifill.

But hey... we only have a few more days to wait. Thursday will be here before ya know it!

[Mr. P]

Anyone consider they may be keeping her under wraps for a reason and they will turn her loose during the debate. I have a feeling it will be a much more interesting debate than anyone is expecting. And a lot of Palin haters and biden lovers are going to be disappointed.

It's not a bias reporter interview. She will be debating biden. And he will have to respond to her as well as she to him.

I see a lot of chicken counting here before the eggs have hatched.

I thought of that..maybe wishful thinking, but yes, I did.
We'll see. Color me uncertain and nervous.

[Silver]

His command of the issues will quickly expose the shallowness of hers, IMHO

Biden does have a command of the issues....

1-Biden on Meet the Press in 2002, discussing Saddam Hussein: “He’s a long term threat and a short term threat to our national security… “We have no choice but to eliminate the threat. This is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world.”

2-Biden on Meet the Press in 2002: “Saddam must be dislodged from his weapons or dislodged from power.”

3-Biden on Meet the Press in 2007, on Hussein’s WMDs: “Well, the point is, it turned out they didn’t, but everyone in the world thought he had them. The weapons inspectors said he had them. He catalogued — they catalogued them. This was not some, some Cheney, you know, pipe dream. This was, in fact, catalogued.”

4-Biden to the Brookings Institution in 2005: “We can call it quits and withdraw from Iraq. I think that would be a gigantic mistake.

----------------------------

No bad for a Democrat....:clap:

[red states rule]

http://www.lostnationtvpoliticalcartoons.com/assets/images/autogen/a_biden400.jpg

[Silver]

Come on mfm...tell us again how SMART Joe Biden is.....

Lets hear a comment on his 'command of the issues'.....

[Yurt]

Biden does have a command of the issues....

1-Biden on Meet the Press in 2002, discussing Saddam Hussein: “He’s a long term threat and a short term threat to our national security… “We have no choice but to eliminate the threat. This is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world.”

2-Biden on Meet the Press in 2002: “Saddam must be dislodged from his weapons or dislodged from power.”

3-Biden on Meet the Press in 2007, on Hussein’s WMDs: “Well, the point is, it turned out they didn’t, but everyone in the world thought he had them. The weapons inspectors said he had them. He catalogued — they catalogued them. This was not some, some Cheney, you know, pipe dream. This was, in fact, catalogued.”

4-Biden to the Brookings Institution in 2005: “We can call it quits and withdraw from Iraq. I think that would be a gigantic mistake.

----------------------------

No bad for a Democrat....:clap:

obammy knows nothing

[retiredman]

Come on mfm...tell us again how SMART Joe Biden is.....

Lets hear a comment on his 'command of the issues'.....

like I have said over and over again...he has forgotten more this week about foreign policy than Sarah Palin has EVER known. Her foreign policy credentials? She can see Russia from her house.:laugh2:

[Yurt]

like I have said over and over again...he has forgotten more this week about foreign policy than Sarah Palin has EVER known. Her foreign policy credentials? She can see Russia from her house.:laugh2:

why don't you man up and actually address biden's statements instead of mouthing meaningless rhetoric....

or is this more of you supporting lying politicians who use "inflated rhetoric?" i just love how you refuse to answer whether inflated rhetoric is the truth.

[retiredman]

why don't you man up and actually address biden's statements instead of mouthing meaningless rhetoric....

or is this more of you supporting lying politicians who use "inflated rhetoric?" i just love how you refuse to answer whether inflated rhetoric is the truth.


inflated rhetoric is inflated rhetoric, like you saying Obammy doesn't know ANYTHING.

Biden and I (and every politician on the planet and I) do not see eye to eye on every single issue. I LIKE Joe Biden. I LIKE his thinking about a federal division of Iraq. I am glad he is on the ticket. The fact that he and I disagree about issues like Saddam's WMD's are irrelevant, especially since he now agrees with me that Saddam never had them. He is a good addition to the ticket. I look forward to his debate with Sarah the hockey mom on Thursday.

[Yurt]

manfrommaine;301638]inflated rhetoric is inflated rhetoric, like you saying Obammy doesn't know ANYTHING.

so then inflated rhetoric is the truth....



Biden and I (and every politician on the planet and I) do not see eye to eye on every single issue. I LIKE Joe Biden. I LIKE his thinking about a federal division of Iraq. I am glad he is on the ticket. The fact that he and I disagree about issues like Saddam's WMD's are irrelevant, especially since he now agrees with me that Saddam never had them. He is a good addition to the ticket. I look forward to his debate with Sarah the hockey mom on Thursday.

from what i have seen, i do not see palin doing well in the debate. if she does not, the election is obama's. i find it amusing how forgiving you are of dems, and how unforgiving you are of republicans. no surprise, your political ideology is very important to you, too important in my opinion. do you dispute that biden said that "EVERYONE" believed he had them?

[retiredman]

so then inflated rhetoric is the truth....




from what i have seen, i do not see palin doing well in the debate. if she does not, the election is obama's. i find it amusing how forgiving you are of dems, and how unforgiving you are of republicans. no surprise, your political ideology is very important to you, too important in my opinion. do you dispute that biden said that "EVERYONE" believed he had them?

how could I dispute a man's recorded words. Like you saying that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING. I acknowledge that Biden was speaking rhetorically,...because he certainly was NEVER speaking for ME regarding Saddam's WMD's..that's for damned sure... and I acknowledge that you are lying when you say that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING...but you know that...it was just rhetorical hyperbole for you and never really a lie, right?:laugh2:

[red states rule]

how could I dispute a man's recorded words. Like you saying that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING. I acknowledge that Biden was speaking rhetorically,...because he certainly was NEVER speaking for ME regarding Saddam's WMD's..that's for damned sure... and I acknowledge that you are lying when you say that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING...but you know that...it was just rhetorical hyperbole for you and never really a lie, right?:laugh2:

Speaking of the man's recorded words

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K5R6kVry4_c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K5R6kVry4_c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Yurt]

how could I dispute a man's recorded words. Like you saying that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING. I acknowledge that Biden was speaking rhetorically,...because he certainly was NEVER speaking for ME regarding Saddam's WMD's..that's for damned sure... and I acknowledge that you are lying when you say that Obama doesn't know ANYTHING...but you know that...it was just rhetorical hyperbole for you and never really a lie, right?:laugh2:

real simple, yes or no:

so then inflated rhetoric is the truth....


http://www.automateexcel.com/media/YesNoMessageBox.gif

[Yurt]

Speaking of the man's recorded words

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K5R6kVry4_c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K5R6kVry4_c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

haha, and people make fun of bush....

[retiredman]

real simple, yes or no:

so then inflated rhetoric is the truth....


http://www.automateexcel.com/media/YesNoMessageBox.gif

real simple: Obammy knows NOTHING? true or false

[Yurt]

i am not surprised someone can't answer a simple question.

ho hum

[red states rule]

real simple: Obammy knows NOTHING? true or false

Obama does not even know what he knows. He really does not have a clue

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qKFRQo3KJ4c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qKFRQo3KJ4c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[retiredman]

i am not surprised someone can't answer a simple question.

ho hum

I'll wait
ho hum

[Yurt]

I'll wait
ho hum

so biden was JOKING....

[retiredman]

so biden was JOKING....


so YOU were joking?

[stephanie]

like I have said over and over again...he has forgotten more this week about foreign policy than Sarah Palin has EVER known. Her foreign policy credentials? She can see Russia from her house.:laugh2:


well, that's more than your commie boy wonder has..

anyone notice how mfn chirps in all happy when someone here say Sarah Palin is stupid...but when anyone here say the Obambam is dumb, he accuses them of hating the man...

[retiredman]

well, that's more than your commie boy wonder has..

anyone notice how mfn chirps in all happy when someone here say Sarah Palin is stupid...but when anyone here say the Obambam is dumb, he accuses them of hating the man...

Obama is not dumb, by any stretch of the imagination. He may not have as much real world experience as others may have, but we normally elect our president based upon qualifications that may include, but are far from limited to real world experience. And I have never accused you of hating Obama, to the best of my recollection. Others on here, maybe, but not you, stephanie.... you are just goofing around, like you always do.:laugh2:

[stephanie]

Obama is not dumb, by any stretch of the imagination. He may not have as much real world experience as others may have, but we normally elect our president based upon qualifications that may include, but are far from limited to real world experience. And I have never accused you of hating Obama, to the best of my recollection. Others on here, maybe, but not you, stephanie.... you are just goofing around, like you always do.:laugh2:


well then...if you say the Obambam may not have as much "REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE"...what's the difference with him who is running FOR President, and Sarah Palin who is running for VICE President..you seem to think the Obambam is ok with not knowing shit, but Sarah Palin(who has been a mayor and now a governor, is not...

I expect to hear the spinning wheels now...

[Yurt]

so YOU were joking?

i said i was joking....:poke:

can you answer the question? or not? are you afraid? seems so.

[gabosaurus]

I don't believe Palin to be dumber than shit. She is merely uninformed on the basic issues of American life.
I am sure Palin is very well versed on what goes on in Alaska. She knows little of the Lower 48 and is clueless about foreign policy. The majority of DP members have visited more foreign countries than Sarah Palin. She didn't have a passport until last year.
Palin knows next to zero about education, urban crime, the current economic crisis and how the country is divided along racial and economic lines.
In an interview last week, Palin confused "recession" and "depression." She showed zero awareness of how to deal with natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods. She couldn't answer simple questions about foreign policy.
I fail to see how the fact that Russian planes fly over Alaska gives you experience in dealing with the Kremlin. Same with the fact that you can see a stretch of Siberia from the outer fringes of Alaska.
Between Palin's incompetence and Bush screwing up the economy, McCain's campaign is doomed.

[stephanie]

I don't believe Palin to be dumber than shit. She is merely uninformed on the basic issues of American life.
I am sure Palin is very well versed on what goes on in Alaska. She knows little of the Lower 48 and is clueless about foreign policy. The majority of DP members have visited more foreign countries than Sarah Palin. She didn't have a passport until last year.
Palin knows next to zero about education, urban crime, the current economic crisis and how the country is divided along racial and economic lines.
In an interview last week, Palin confused "recession" and "depression." She showed zero awareness of how to deal with natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods. She couldn't answer simple questions about foreign policy.
I fail to see how the fact that Russian planes fly over Alaska gives you experience in dealing with the Kremlin. Same with the fact that you can see a stretch of Siberia from the outer fringes of Alaska.
Between Palin's incompetence and Bush screwing up the economy, McCain's campaign is doomed.




you all need training on how it is to live........not in the cement jungle......but back to the REAL WORLD..

you think because you live in a big city and a high rise building with a doorman, that gives you the smarts to MORE UNDERSTAND THE WORLD...your condensation is well noted and we joke all the time about it..

but us knuckledraggers(as we've been known to be called by you all............could give a rats ass........:laugh2:

Sarah Palin for President......2012

[Silver]

I don't believe Palin to be dumber than shit. She is merely uninformed on the basic issues of American life.
I am sure Palin is very well versed on what goes on in Alaska. She knows little of the Lower 48 and is clueless about foreign policy. The majority of DP members have visited more foreign countries than Sarah Palin. She didn't have a passport until last year.

wow ....no shit, ...my 8 year old granddaughter
has a passport, can she be President? It must be very very important to have one...


Palin knows next to zero about education, urban crime, the current economic crisis and how the country is divided along racial and economic lines.
In an interview last week, Palin confused "recession" and "depression." She showed zero awareness of how to deal with natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods. She couldn't answer simple questions about foreign policy.
I fail to see how the fact that Russian planes fly over Alaska gives you experience in dealing with the Kremlin. Same with the fact that you can see a stretch of Siberia from the outer fringes of Alaska.
Between Palin's incompetence and Bush screwing up the economy, McCain's campaign is doomed.
a

[retiredman]

i said i was joking....:poke:



where? I never saw any such statement that your comment about Obama knowing nothing was a joke. especially at the time you wrote it.

I'll wait.

[namvet]

I don't believe Palin to be dumber than shit. She is merely uninformed on the basic issues of American life.
I am sure Palin is very well versed on what goes on in Alaska. She knows little of the Lower 48 and is clueless about foreign policy. The majority of DP members have visited more foreign countries than Sarah Palin. She didn't have a passport until last year.
Palin knows next to zero about education, urban crime, the current economic crisis and how the country is divided along racial and economic lines.
In an interview last week, Palin confused "recession" and "depression." She showed zero awareness of how to deal with natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods. She couldn't answer simple questions about foreign policy.
I fail to see how the fact that Russian planes fly over Alaska gives you experience in dealing with the Kremlin. Same with the fact that you can see a stretch of Siberia from the outer fringes of Alaska.
Between Palin's incompetence and Bush screwing up the economy, McCain's campaign is doomed.

being Bipolar you'd know

[OCA]

Sarah Palin for President......2012

So you are admitting that Johnny Lib is toast this election cycle?

[namvet]

So you are admitting that Johnny Lib is toast this election cycle?

no she didn't numb nuts !!!!!!! you did.

[OCA]

no she didn't numb nuts !!!!!!! you did.

Let me see if I can explain this for you through your heroin fog, if Sarah Palin were to run for PRESIDENT in 2012 that would mean Johnny Lib lost in 2008 since if he had won(it would take divine intervention now) then he would be the fucking incumbent and certainly be renominated.

Are you really this fucking stupid?

[namvet]

Let me see if I can explain this for you through your heroin fog, if Sarah Palin were to run for PRESIDENT in 2012 that would mean Johnny Lib lost in 2008 since if he had won(it would take divine intervention now) then he would be the fucking incumbent and certainly be renominated.

Are you really this fucking stupid?

if and buts and maybe???? stupid !!!!!!!

[OCA]

if and buts and maybe???? stupid !!!!!!!

Sorry you are unable to understand, get off the needle and comprehension might come.

[namvet]

Sorry you are unable to understand, get off the needle and comprehension might come.

time to crawl back under your "rock" reptile ?????

[stephanie]

I say Sarah Palin in 2012, because I believe John McCain would only serve one term, then turn it over to her..

[OCA]

I say Sarah Palin in 2012, because I believe John McCain would only serve one term, then turn it over to her..

Ok first of all, if there is a miracle by the grace of God and he gets elected and he don't get sick or die between 09 and 12 no freaking way does he hand over the reigns, he's a power junky, he's wanted this position for a long, long time.

[Gaffer]

I say Sarah Palin in 2012, because I believe John McCain would only serve one term, then turn it over to her..

That's what I think too, and its a good posibility she will run as the incumbent.

[Yurt]

real simple, yes or no:

so then inflated rhetoric is the truth....


http://www.automateexcel.com/media/YesNoMessageBox.gif


i am not surprised someone can't answer a simple question.

ho hum

somebody is obviously to scared to answer a simple question....

[retiredman]

where? I never saw any such statement that your comment about Obama knowing nothing was a joke. especially at the time you wrote it.

I'll wait.

someone is obviously too ashamed to admit that they were not truthful.

sad, really.

[Abbey Marie]

well, that's more than your commie boy wonder has..

anyone notice how mfn chirps in all happy when someone here say Sarah Palin is stupid...but when anyone here say the Obambam is dumb, he accuses them of hating the man...

It's beyond that Stephanie. If someone fails to express outrage over ugly things said about Obama, he or she is racist. But mfm's failure to come to Palin's defense when she is ripped apart, is not sexist or misogynist. It's apparently juuuust fine.

[Kathianne]

It's beyond that Stephanie. If someone fails to express outrage over ugly things said about Obama, he or she is racist. But mfm's failure to come to Palin's defense when she is ripped apart, is not sexist or misogynist. It's apparently juuuust fine.

Agreed. His bias is apparent in how he responds to women that question him. Palin certainly is among them.

[retiredman]

Agreed. His bias is apparent in how he responds to women that question him. Palin certainly is among them.

I respond to women no differently than I do to men. Did you WANT me to?

[Kathianne]

I respond to women no differently than I do to men. Did you WANT me to?

Actually you do. You respond to informed women very different from men, especially regarding politics. You do not attempt to bully the men into admonishing posters you don't agree with, you've done so many times with myself and Abbey.

For some reason you feel the need to paste Abbey as a racist, when anyone who's read her posts for more than 3 years know that's just a falsehood, doesn't stop you.

[retiredman]

Actually you do. You respond to informed women very different from men, especially regarding politics. You do not attempt to bully the men into admonishing posters you don't agree with, you've done so many times with myself and Abbey.

For some reason you feel the need to paste Abbey as a racist, when anyone who's read her posts for more than 3 years know that's just a falsehood, doesn't stop you.


she stated that my failure to castigate liberals on here FOR POSTS THAT I HAD NOT EVEN READ - PROVED that I was a sexist and a misogynist. I merely stated that such an accusation on her part was an admission that she, therefore, must be a racist for failing to castigate conservatives for posts that she clearly HAD read.
Do I think that Abbey is a racist? Of course not. Do I think that YOU are a racist? Of course not. I thnk you are both intelligent posters regardless of your gender.

Do I think that, when you call me "numb nuts", I ought to feel free to call you "flabby tits"? absolutely.:laugh2:

[Yurt]

someone is obviously too ashamed to admit that they were not truthful.

sad, really.

after reviewing the post, i now see the confusion. i was talking about my statement going to iraq as joking. as to obama not knowing anything, i believe that is not inflated rhetoric, remember the time when you said something and you qualified "i said it a million times." you were called on it and you defended it as a normal exaggeration that no one really believes you actually meant, a million times.

inflated rhetoric's purpose is to decieve the listener and to cause the listener to believe the speaker is greater than they actually are. it is not an exaggeration that is expected like the 'million times' or obama does not know anything.

but i am not surprised you support candidates that willfully decieve their listeners. to you, party is more important than country.

now that i answered your question, which you asked AFTER my question, it will be interesting to see if you have the courage to answer mine.

[Kathianne]

she stated that my failure to castigate liberals on here FOR POSTS THAT I HAD NOT EVEN READ - PROVED that I was a sexist and a misogynist. I merely stated that such an accusation on her part was an admission that she, therefore, must be a racist for failing to castigate conservatives for posts that she clearly HAD read.
Do I think that Abbey is a racist? Of course not. Do I think that YOU are a racist? Of course not. I thnk you are both intelligent posters regardless of your gender.

Do I think that, when you call me "numb nuts", I ought to feel free to call you "flabby tits"? absolutely.:laugh2:

Unfortunately for you, you have a long history of reading and responding to liberal posts. Abbey was making an informed inference. If it was wrong, no problem saying so, but that's not what you did, bully than you are. Loser that you are. Liar that you are.

[retiredman]

after reviewing the post, i now see the confusion. i was talking about my statement going to iraq as joking. as to obama not knowing anything, i believe that is not inflated rhetoric, remember the time when you said something and you qualified "i said it a million times." you were called on it and you defended it as a normal exaggeration that no one really believes you actually meant, a million times.

inflated rhetoric's purpose is to decieve the listener and to cause the listener to believe the speaker is greater than they actually are. it is not an exaggeration that is expected like the 'million times' or obama does not know anything.

but i am not surprised you support candidates that willfully decieve their listeners. to you, party is more important than country.

now that i answered your question, which you asked AFTER my question, it will be interesting to see if you have the courage to answer mine.
so..let me get this straight: inflated rhetoric is perfectly acceptable as long as YOU use it, but subject to scrutiny when democrats use it. Have I got that right?

and again...NOTHING is more important to me than country.....regardless of your attempts to slander me and my patriotism by saying otherwise.

[Kathianne]

so..let me get this straight: inflated rhetoric is perfectly acceptable as long as YOU use it, but subject to scrutiny when democrats use it. Have I got that right?

and again...NOTHING is more important to me than country.....regardless of your attempts to slander me and my patriotism by saying otherwise.

Bullshit. All that matters to you is your retirement pay and the homage you think you're entitled to. Well you are not.

[retiredman]

Bullshit. All that matters to you is your retirement pay and the homage you think you're entitled to. Well you are not.


I am certainly not entitled to the latter...but, I AM entitled to the former, and I EARNED it, bitch, by keeping your fat ass safe for a quarter of a century!:lol:

[Yurt]

so..let me get this straight: inflated rhetoric is perfectly acceptable as long as YOU use it, but subject to scrutiny when democrats use it. Have I got that right?

and again...NOTHING is more important to me than country.....regardless of your attempts to slander me and my patriotism by saying otherwise.

no, you don't have it straight. go back and reread my post. and you still won't answer my question. why is that? why can't you answer a simple question? are you a coward?

it is not slander, unless you consider calling me a racist slander....

[retiredman]

no, you don't have it straight. go back and reread my post. and you still won't answer my question. why is that? why can't you answer a simple question? are you a coward?

it is not slander, unless you consider calling me a racist slander....

you can say that Obama knows NOTHING and that is fine, but Biden can speak rhetorically, and it's a lie for HIM?:laugh2:

[Yurt]

you can say that Obama knows NOTHING and that is fine, but Biden can speak rhetorically, and it's a lie for HIM?:laugh2:

you are slippery, no doubt. and a fucking coward. you can't answer my question, LOL.

if you really served this country, good for you and thank you. but what you have become....now.... is a failure to this country. you should be ashamed. you refuse to answer a simple question. yet when others do not, you stamp your feet and keyboard loudly until they do. you are hypocrite at best....

[retiredman]

you are slippery, no doubt. and a fucking coward. you can't answer my question, LOL.

if you really served this country, good for you and thank you. but what you have become....now.... is a failure to this country. you should be ashamed. you refuse to answer a simple question. yet when others do not, you stamp your feet and keyboard loudly until they do. you are hypocrite at best....rhetorical rhetoric is not entirely truthful, nor is it entirely false.

YOUR continued insults of me personally do not enhance your arguments at all, but merely make your claims of desiring to move beyond insults with me seem clearly false.

That's OK... I still forgive you.

[Yurt]

rhetorical rhetoric is not entirely truthful, nor is it entirely false.

YOUR continued insults of me personally do not enhance your arguments at all, but merely make your claims of desiring to move beyond insults with me seem clearly false.

That's OK... I still forgive you.

did biden entirely tell the truth? did biden not entirely tell a falsehood. :laugh2: and you called it exaggerated rhetoric, not rhetorical rhetoric :laugh2:

bill clinton would be proud of you mfm. you stretch the truth like a pro. is there a 99% truth? an 89% truth? what about a 11%truth? maybe a 25% lie?

and don't forgive me, for i have nothing to be forgiven for in this exchange. how sad for you though.

[Kathianne]

you are slippery, no doubt. and a fucking coward. you can't answer my question, LOL.

if you really served this country, good for you and thank you. but what you have become....now.... is a failure to this country. you should be ashamed. you refuse to answer a simple question. yet when others do not, you stamp your feet and keyboard loudly until they do. you are hypocrite at best....

There was a time I would have agreed with you, that he'd served and was deserving of recognition, no more. He wants all kudos to his being the son of an well known lawyer, admitted to Annapolis. Who the hell knows where he graduated, but even if at the top of his class, he's proven himself a bully since then. Accusing his men and others, including those that led them of less than honorable behavior. It's culminative.

MFM not only holds the enlisted men and women in contempt, also the American people. All are beneath him and the elite that SHOULD rule America. That America would be of the elite choosing. Socialist for a start.

[Yurt]

There was a time I would have agreed with you, that he'd served and was deserving of recognition, no more. He wants all kudos to his being the son of an well known lawyer, admitted to Annapolis. Who the hell knows where he graduated, but even if at the top of his class, he's proven himself a bully since then. Accusing his men and others, including those that led them of less than honorable behavior. It's culminative.

MFM not only holds the enlisted men and women in contempt, also the American people. All are beneath him and the elite that SHOULD rule America. That America would be of the elite choosing. Socialist for a start.

and there was a time you chastised me for a similiar attitude about mfm. i don't know for a fact he served or did not serve. neither do you. carry on though kathy and i won't expect i can chastise you similarly.

[retiredman]

There was a time I would have agreed with you, that he'd served and was deserving of recognition, no more. He wants all kudos to his being the son of an well known lawyer, admitted to Annapolis. Who the hell knows where he graduated, but even if at the top of his class, he's proven himself a bully since then. Accusing his men and others, including those that led them of less than honorable behavior. It's culminative.

MFM not only holds the enlisted men and women in contempt, also the American people. All are beneath him and the elite that SHOULD rule America. That America would be of the elite choosing. Socialist for a start.

I never accused my men of less than honorable behavior. that is alie...but from you, flabbytits...it doesn't surprise me.:laugh2:

[Kathianne]

and there was a time you chastised me for a similiar attitude about mfm. i don't know for a fact he served or did not serve. neither do you. carry on though kathy and i won't expect i can chastise you similarly.

If I did, which is ver possible when as I was trying to give MFM room for his pov, I'm sorry. I haven't a clue to whether he served or not, but would bet that if so, he has literally thousands that would like to burn his ass.

As for chastising me, go ahead, get your jollies.

[Kathianne]

I never accused my men of less than honorable behavior. that is alie...but from you, flabbytits...it doesn't surprise me.:laugh2:

Thanks for proving Yurts and My points. You are a Prince of darkness.

[retiredman]

Thanks for proving Yurts and My points. You are a Prince of darkness.

what points have I proven by disputing your spurious, slanderous claims that I was anything other than a supportive and affirming leader, flabbytits?:laugh2:

[retiredman]

If I did, which is ver possible when as I was trying to give MFM room for his pov, I'm sorry. I haven't a clue to whether he served or not, but would bet that if so, he has literally thousands that would like to burn his ass.

As for chastising me, go ahead, get your jollies.


your continued insults of my service make me laugh, flabbytits.... Is it true that, on the beach, you can walk into the water up to your tits and your knees are still dry?

[Yurt]

If I did, which is ver possible when as I was trying to give MFM room for his pov, I'm sorry. I haven't a clue to whether he served or not, but would bet that if so, he has literally thousands that would like to burn his ass.

As for chastising me, go ahead, get your jollies.

i don't get jollies chastising people....

mfm had all the room he needed kathy. i told you that. he was invited here by the owner of the board, what more room do you need? and i don't blame jim for inviting him here. he may be an asshole, but he writes well and presents a good counter argument. just because i win every debate him and i get into, does not mean i don't respect him.....:laugh2:

[Yurt]

your continued insults of my service make me laugh, flabbytits.... Is it true that, on the beach, you can walk into the water up to your tits and your knees are still dry?

is this necessary preacher? what is today's lesson?

[retiredman]

is this necessary preacher? what is today's lesson?

don't dare hold me to a higher standard than you hold your republican buddies.... she calls me numbnuts and calls my daughter a slut and YOU defend her????? why am I not surprised?:fu:

[Yurt]

don't dare hold me to a higher standard than you hold your republican buddies.... she calls me numbnuts and calls my daughter a slut and YOU defend her????? why am I not surprised?:fu:

where and when did i defend her? link up big guy.

[retiredman]

where and when did i defend her? link up big guy.

why get involved in #86? it is clearly none of your business, is it, big guy?

Unless, of course, you are defending her....LOL

[Kathianne]

where and when did i defend her? link up big guy.

I don't need defending, even without my floatation devices. ;) I'm happy being me, my boys are not castrated in any way and my daughter is way too emancipated from me. :laugh2:

[Yurt]

why get involved in #86? it is clearly none of your business, is it, big guy?

Unless, of course, you are defending her....LOL

either answer my question or don't. real simple big buy. thing is, you won't recant, you won't admit you are wrong and made stuff up. it is your problem, not mine. you are the one who gave false testimony. not me.

we all know you are a chicken answer another question, it is no suprrise you are a chicken here. but do carry on, perfect father.

[retiredman]

either answer my question or don't. real simple big buy. thing is, you won't recant, you won't admit you are wrong and made stuff up. it is your problem, not mine. you are the one who gave false testimony. not me.

we all know you are a chicken answer another question, it is no suprrise you are a chicken here. but do carry on, perfect father.


which question would you like me to answer? And I AM a pretty good dad.... how are YOU doing in that regard? :lol:

[Kathianne]

which question would you like me to answer? And I AM a pretty good dad.... how are YOU doing in that regard? :lol:

Interestingly enough, I'd be very interested hearing from your children away from you. Just like the 'enlisted men' ie fodder, that served 'under you', Annapolis grad et al. Gag me.

[retiredman]

Interestingly enough, I'd be very interested hearing from your children away from you. Just like the 'enlisted men' ie fodder, that served 'under you', Annapolis grad et al. Gag me.

gag me? gag me? go fuck yourself. My daughter has a full academic schedule....as IF I am going to expect her to divert her attention to answer some flabby titted old crone of a school teacher about what kind of father I am. I would be very interested to hear from you students away from you.... care to arrange that?????:laugh2:

[Yurt]

which question would you like me to answer? And I AM a pretty good dad.... how are YOU doing in that regard? :lol:

if you don't know, you are an idiot.

i don't have kids mfm, nor do i want them at this point. you know that, so your comment is solely directed at some percieved insult that because i do not have kids, that makes me less of a person.

how you stand in front of your church and 'preach' is beyond me.....

you can't even spread the good word on a fucking internet forum.

[Kathianne]

gag me? gag me? go fuck yourself. My daughter has a full academic schedule....as IF I am going to expect her to divert her attention to answer some flabby titted old crone of a school teacher about what kind of father I am. I would be very interested to hear from you students away from you.... care to arrange that?????:laugh2:

Here's the difference MFM. I wasn't asking you to get your daughter or sons. I wouldn't do that. You on the other hand, haven't a problem attempting to hurt others online. Not my bag. If you get hurt, well it's only collateral damage.

I'm not about to try and hurt your kids, wife. I don't wish death upon you or hell or threaten to piss or not upon your grave. That is your bag, not mine.

I made observations upon your posts, I may be right or wrong. My guess, closer to right than wrong, unlike what you wish for my students. LOL! Which is why you are all upset and your name calling hasn't bothered my blood pressure a bit, which really is quite sensitive. :poke:

[retiredman]

Here's the difference MFM. I wasn't asking you to get your daughter or sons. I wouldn't do that. You on the other hand, haven't a problem attempting to hurt others online. Not my bag. If you get hurt, well it's only collateral damage.

I'm not about to try and hurt your kids, wife. I don't wish death upon you or hell or threaten to piss or not upon your grave. That is your bag, not mine.

I made observations upon your posts, I may be right or wrong. My guess, closer to right than wrong, unlike what you wish for my students. LOL! Which is why you are all upset and your name calling hasn't bothered my blood pressure a bit, which really is quite sensitive. :poke:


:yawn: You and RSR need to give it up on that...I apologized for my attack on him months ago. YOu do know, do you not, that if you don't forgive your brother and your sister from you heart, you are going straight to Hell?

And really kathianne. MY kids and I have a great relationship...and your insulting it really is beneath my already lowered expectations of you.

If you would like to dial this thing back, I would be more than amenable. If not, keep it comin', flabbytits:laugh2:

[Mr. P]

As I've said before,MFM, you are no man of God.

As far as service goes..scan your DD-214 block the name and post it.

[Kathianne]

:yawn: You and RSR need to give it up on that...I apologized for my attack on him months ago. YOu do know, do you not, that if you don't forgive your brother and your sister from you heart, you are going straight to Hell?

And really kathianne. MY kids and I have a great relationship...and your insulting it really is beneath my already lowered expectations of you.

If you would like to dial this thing back, I would be more than amenable. If not, keep it comin', flabbytits:laugh2:

Well since you continue to use your name of the day, I meanwhile refrain. In any case, your relationship with your kids is what it is, no matter how you think it is. Just like your enlisted men, you know, the ones you thought were worth shit? Oh yeah.

Nothing is beneath you MFM, you are the bottom, none of us can come close, not me, not your kids, not the 'enlisted men'.

[retiredman]

Well since you continue to use your name of the day, I meanwhile refrain. In any case, your relationship with your kids is what it is, no matter how you think it is. Just like your enlisted men, you know, the ones you thought were worth shit? Oh yeah.

Nothing is beneath you MFM, you are the bottom, none of us can come close, not me, not your kids, not the 'enlisted men'.

I have NEVER said that my enlisted men were worth shit. As I said...I am sure that the vast majority had a great time serving with me and remember the great things we accomplished and the fun we had doing so. And again...let me remind you...you have NO idea what my relationship with my children is....if you want to call me a liar, have the gumption to do so and then have the character to back up your assertion with more than your unsupported opinion.

And because you now refrain, that means your calling me numbnuts has no merit or is not indicative of YOUR character?:laugh2:

[Kathianne]

I have NEVER said that my enlisted men were worth shit. As I said...I am sure that the vast majority had a great time serving with me and remember the great things we accomplished and the fun we had doing so. And again...let me remind you...you have NO idea what my relationship with my children is....if you want to call me a liar, have the gumption to do so and then have the character to back up your assertion with more than your unsupported opinion.

And because you now refrain, that means your calling me numbnuts has no merit or is not indicative of YOUR character?:laugh2:
Nope, none. You are a numbnuts, it's all about YOU, at least in your little window of the world. None of us exist, not conservatives, children, enlisted men, or parishioners. We're just 'there', for your use. That my dear, is the definition of a narcissist, which you are. Wake up and smell the DSM. Your wife will thank you, if she still serves a purpose for you.

[retiredman]

As I've said before,MFM, you are no man of God.

As far as service goes..scan your DD-214 block the name and post it.

you need to understand something: I really don't give a FUCK if you believe me or not. Can you wrap your pea-sized brain around that? DO try for me....please. I don't doubt who you are...you are a guy who was an officer in the airforce and had shitloads of hours flying aircraft. And even if I DID doubt you, I certainly would not expect you to give a shit one way or the other. Be kind enough to grant me the same courtesy...OK?:laugh2:

[retiredman]

Nope, none. You are a numbnuts, it's all about YOU, at least in your little window of the world. None of us exist, not conservatives, children, enlisted men, or parishioners. We're just 'there', for your use. That my dear, is the definition of a narcissist, which you are. Wake up and smell the DSM. Your wife will thank you, if she still serves a purpose for you.

no...you are wrong. You and your conservative cronies from DP.com might exist for my intellectual entertainment, but everyone else you mention - from my real life - is very important to me... and be a dear and keep my wife and kids out of this. mmmkay?

[Yurt]

no...you are wrong. You and your conservative cronies from DP.com might exist for my intellectual entertainment, but everyone else you mention - from my real life - is very important to me... and be a dear and keep my wife and kids out of this. mmmkay?

good to know that you view this forum as fake.....

no wonder you hide yourself behind your virtual pulpit.

[retiredman]

good to know that you view this forum as fake.....

no wonder you hide yourself behind your virtual pulpit.

I don't view this forum as "fake", only stacked.

[Kathianne]

I don't view this forum as "fake", only stacked.

'Stacked'? How? Only me, have you seen anyone else? Have I threatened you in any way?

[retiredman]

'Stacked'? How? Only me, have you seen anyone else? Have I threatened you in any way?

if they sag, you can't really count 'em as stacked.

By stacked, I meant stacked with conservatives. LOL

Come on, kath.... you and I can dial this back....wouldn't you like to?:slap:

[Kathianne]

if they sag, you can't really count 'em as stacked.

By stacked, I meant stacked with conservatives. LOL

Come on, kath.... you and I can dial this back....wouldn't you like to?:slap:

Funny, you were the only one responding to your attempt to reference breasts on women. Considering that your assumption that at 50 some year old, they are 'sagging' and I'm supposed to flee in terror that I'm not sexually attractive anymore, well you lose. I know that I am, more than that, I know that the boobies are not 'sagging', same old place they've been, since I lost weight.

Now, honestly, can you keep the big boy up without viagra? LOL! F off.

[Yurt]

I don't view this forum as "fake", only stacked.

you mean..... like ...... stacked with the owner of the forum inviting you here?

[Mr. P]

you need to understand something: I really don't give a FUCK if you believe me or not. Can you wrap your pea-sized brain around that? DO try for me....please. I don't doubt who you are...you are a guy who was an officer in the airforce and had shitloads of hours flying aircraft. And even if I DID doubt you, I certainly would not expect you to give a shit one way or the other. Be kind enough to grant me the same courtesy...OK?:laugh2:

You need to understand that I really don't care if you care or not. The thing is you want others to care about what you say. Understand?

Oh, I was Army not Airforce. I would be kind enough to not challenge you if you didn't continuously toss yer service around like it's a trump card. I'd would like to see proof from anyone that does such. DD-214 please.

[retiredman]

You need to understand that I really don't care if you care or not. The thing is you want others to care about what you say. Understand?

Oh, I was Army not Airforce. I would be kind enough to not challenge you if you didn't continuously toss yer service around like it's a trump card. I'd would like to see proof from anyone that does such. DD-214 please.

shit in one hand and hope for me to post personal information on the internet in the other..... tell me which one fills up faster. :laugh2:

And I DON'T toss my service around as anything other than what it is: a part of my life which has provided me with certain insights. If I were a retired heart surgeon, and this were a WebMD blog, I would feel free to weigh in on issues concering cardiovascular health.

[retiredman]

you mean..... like ...... stacked with the owner of the forum inviting you here?


jimnyc did not invite me here. I have no idea where you got that idea. Actually, nevadamedic first invited me here.. from USMB.

[retiredman]

Funny, you were the only one responding to your attempt to reference breasts on women. Considering that your assumption that at 50 some year old, they are 'sagging' and I'm supposed to flee in terror that I'm not sexually attractive anymore, well you lose. I know that I am, more than that, I know that the boobies are not 'sagging', same old place they've been, since I lost weight.

Now, honestly, can you keep the big boy up without viagra? LOL! F off.

like I said... if you would like to raise the level of debate between us, I would gladly agree. If you wanna keep it at this level, so be it.

[Kathianne]

like I said... if you would like to raise the level of debate between us, I would gladly agree. If you wanna keep it at this level, so be it.

Actually your level of debate is on the physical, not mine. So no.

[retiredman]

Actually your level of debate is on the physical, not mine. So no.

numbnuts?

like I said...if you'd like to retreat from this nasty precipice I'd be glad to oblige.

[Kathianne]

numbnuts?

like I said...if you'd like to retreat from this nasty precipice I'd be glad to oblige.

I've 'forgiven' you for being a numbnuts, idiot, nasty person in general. I've been saved and am feeling great. Doesn't change what you are.

[retiredman]

I've 'forgiven' you for being a numbnuts, idiot, nasty person in general. I've been saved and am feeling great. Doesn't change what you are.


I really am a quite nice guy in person if you ever got to know me!;)

[Yurt]

like I said... if you would like to raise the level of debate between us, I would gladly agree. If you wanna keep it at this level, so be it.

......preacher........


i'm sure that lesson is in the bible

[red states rule]

Here's the difference MFM. I wasn't asking you to get your daughter or sons. I wouldn't do that. You on the other hand, haven't a problem attempting to hurt others online. Not my bag. If you get hurt, well it's only collateral damage.

I'm not about to try and hurt your kids, wife. I don't wish death upon you or hell or threaten to piss or not upon your grave. That is your bag, not mine.

I made observations upon your posts, I may be right or wrong. My guess, closer to right than wrong, unlike what you wish for my students. LOL! Which is why you are all upset and your name calling hasn't bothered my blood pressure a bit, which really is quite sensitive. :poke:

I suspect if MFM was a naval officer he was a cross between Esn Parker and Capt Binghamton. A total inept fool - or a egomanic who thinks it is all about him

With the people around MFM, he probably trys to make them bow and cower before his "greatness" and is probably a control freak. I pity anyone who has to have contact with this parasitic adult loser

[Kathianne]

Anyone consider they may be keeping her under wraps for a reason and they will turn her loose during the debate. I have a feeling it will be a much more interesting debate than anyone is expecting. And a lot of Palin haters and biden lovers are going to be disappointed.

It's not a bias reporter interview. She will be debating biden. And he will have to respond to her as well as she to him.

I see a lot of chicken counting here before the eggs have hatched.

Perhaps:

http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780385525015.html



The Breakthrough

Politics and Race in the Age of Obama

Written by Gwen Ifill
Author Alerts: Random House will alert you to new works by Gwen Ifill

* Category: Current Affairs - Political; History - United States - 20th Century; History - United States - 21St Century
* Format: Hardcover, 272 pages
* On Sale: January 20, 2009
* Price: $24.95
* ISBN: 978-0-385-52501-5 (0-385-52501-X)

(Available January 20, 2009)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhkmZM0A4NY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhkmZM0A4NY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[retiredman]

so are you predicting that Gwen is in the tank for Obama and will go gunning for poor little Sarah?

[red states rule]

so are you predicting that Gwen is in the tank for Obama and will go gunning for poor little Sarah?

Eh, you posted twice on this thread that she is

Post # 7 and #10

[namvet]

Perhaps:

http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780385525015.html



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhkmZM0A4NY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhkmZM0A4NY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

nice lady. BUT she's in Osama's tank. she's a liberal

Debate, Tanked

By Michelle Malkin

My dictionary defines “moderator” as “the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting.” On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.

But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She’s so far in the tank for the Democratic presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.




source (source)

[red states rule]

nice lady. BUT she's in Osama's tank. she's a liberal

Debate, Tanked


source (source)

What more proof do you need? MFM said she was in the tank for Obama and would go after Gov Palin in the debate

[namvet]

What more proof do you need? MFM said she was in the tank for Obama and would go after Gov Palin in the debate

no surprise. PBS is liberal.............

[red states rule]

no surprise. PBS is liberal.............

With the exception of Fox news, what network is NOT?

That is why libs like MFM do not see them as liberal. They think like they think and see the bias coverage as factual and reasonable

But when they see the other side of the coin, and the facts about their bias, they have a shitfit

MFM openly hopes for the liberal bias, and wants to see a 2 on 1 "debate"

[namvet]

With the exception of Fox news, what network is NOT?

That is why libs like MFM do not see them as liberal. They think like they think and see the bias coverage as factual and reasonable

But when they see the other side of the coin, and the facts about their bias, they have a shitfit

MFM openly hopes for the liberal bias, and wants to see a 2 on 1 "debate"

I don't know who assigns these mods. but after going on the air they should be REQUIRED to reveal their politics. she should say, on the air, she endorses Osama. lets clear the air. make it public.

[red states rule]

I don't know who assigns these mods. but after going on the air they should be REQUIRED to reveal their politics. she should say, on the air, she endorses Osama. lets clear the air. make it public.

NPR is like NBC. Liberalism of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the airwaves.

[Abbey Marie]

I don't know who assigns these mods. but after going on the air they should be REQUIRED to reveal their politics. she should say, on the air, she endorses Osama. lets clear the air. make it public.

That's a fantastic idea, so of course it will never happen.

[red states rule]

That's a fantastic idea, so of course it will never happen.

As long at it does not happen there is still hope both MFM and OCA will be the mods for the next Presidential debate

[namvet]

NPR is like NBC. Liberalism of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the airwaves.

im sure Palin has been well versed. and she should make it public after they go on the air. shove it right back up their ass...............

[namvet]

That's a fantastic idea, so of course it will never happen.

here's a good time for Palin to shine. on the air she should point to this mod and say clearly "liberal".

[GW in Ohio]

here's a good time for Palin to shine. on the air she should point to this mod and say clearly "liberal".

What a fantastic idea, NamVet. Palin should whine about the liberal bias of the moderator during tomorrow's debate.

That's the way to win friends and influence people.

You're a frickin' genius, man.

[red states rule]

What a fantastic idea, NamVet. Palin should whine about the liberal bias of the moderator during tomorrow's debate.

That's the way to win friends and influence people.

You're a frickin' genius, man.

She does not have to. Polls have shown a majority of viewers are well aware of the liberal bias in the media

That is why their ratings have tanked

[retiredman]

no surprise. PBS is liberal.............

as always, RSR misrepresents my statements. I have never said that Ifill was in the tank for Obama, nor have I said that she would be less than objective in her moderator duties.

but it is good to know that the right is already polishing up its excuses for when Sarah displays the shallowness of her intellect.:laugh2:

[red states rule]

as always, RSR misrepresents my statements. I have never said that Ifill was in the tank for Obama, nor have I said that she would be less than objective in her moderator duties.

but it is good to know that the right is already polishing up its excuses for when Sarah displays the shallowness of her intellect.:laugh2:

Liar

Here are your posts. You admitted she was in the tank for Obama


If she can't hold her own against Couric, Biden will chew her apart...and Gwen will help

She'd better learn quickly.... Biden and Ifill are on the agenda for this Thursday!

maybe a valium or a quaalude would help.

[namvet]

What a fantastic idea, NamVet. Palin should whine about the liberal bias of the moderator during tomorrow's debate.

That's the way to win friends and influence people.

You're a frickin' genius, man.

and if the mod is conservative????? you'll bounce off the walls.

[red states rule]

and if the mod is conservative????? you'll bounce off the walls.

Remember the cow they had when Tony Snow was made Press Sec? Libs had a cow

But when former Clinton people like Stephanopoulos get their own TV show, or ABC reporter Linda Douglas goes to work for Obama they are silent