PDA

View Full Version : Not So Bad; Bad; Very, Very Bad Obamanomics



Kathianne
10-12-2008, 07:55 AM
Well if OCA is right and Obama is to take the oath 1/20/09, it's a good thing to be forewarned about what we may see:




Invasion of the Wallet Snatchers
Confirming your suspicions about Obamanomics.
by Matthew Continetti
10/20/2008, Volume 014, Issue 06


Hello and welcome to Advanced Obamanomics at WEEKLY STANDARD U. If you are in this class, you have passed Remedial Rubinomics, Identity and Globalization in the Works of Barack Obama, and Introduction to Contemporary Religion with Professor Jeremiah Wright. Also, your check has cleared. Congratulations.

As noted in the syllabus, the required reading for today's class includes The Audacity of Hope pp. 220-257; Obama's March 27, 2008, speech in New York City on "Renewing the American Economy"; Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein's Nudge; David Leonhardt's indispensable August 24, 2008, New York Times magazine article "Obamanomics," from which the title of this class is drawn; and Robert Kuttner's Obama's Challenge...

... Invasion of the Wallet Snatchers
Confirming your suspicions about Obamanomics.
by Matthew Continetti
10/20/2008, Volume 014, Issue 06


Hello and welcome to Advanced Obamanomics at WEEKLY STANDARD U. If you are in this class, you have passed Remedial Rubinomics, Identity and Globalization in the Works of Barack Obama, and Introduction to Contemporary Religion with Professor Jeremiah Wright. Also, your check has cleared. Congratulations.

As noted in the syllabus, the required reading for today's class includes The Audacity of Hope pp. 220-257; Obama's March 27, 2008, speech in New York City on "Renewing the American Economy"; Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein's Nudge; David Leonhardt's indispensable August 24, 2008, New York Times magazine article "Obamanomics," from which the title of this class is drawn; and Robert Kuttner's Obama's Challenge.

Now, most of your classmates probably spent last night experimenting with the booze luge they had constructed out of plywood and a bag of crushed ice. You, however, made it through the required reading without--and this is no small feat--falling asleep. This means that there is a bright future in store for you at either the Bureau of Labor Statistics or the Congressional Budget Office. Good thing you didn't miss this incredible opportunity by going to last night's underwear party, getting wasted, and setting a couch on fire.

Since this is a conservative institution with the highest academic standards, each class will begin with a quiz. Who said the following?

NUMBER ONE: "I accuse the present administration of being the greatest spending administration in peace times in all our history. .  .  . I regard reduction in federal spending as one of the most important issues of this campaign."

NUMBER TWO: "The market is the best mechanism ever invented for efficiently allocating resources to maximize production. .  .  . And I also think that there is a connection between the freedom of the marketplace and freedom more generally."

Correct! Speaker number one is then-presidential candidate Franklin Delano Roosevelt, campaigning in 1932. And speaker number two is presidential candidate Barack Obama, campaigning in 2008. It's often forgotten, today, how FDR campaigned for the presidency as a budget balancer who was going to rein in federal spending. And while Obama may be a liberal who spent his youth as a leftwinger, he has plenty of nice things to say about the free market. He is not going to collectivize agriculture or nationalize the banks. The Bush administration has already done that anyway.

The larger point of this quiz is to illustrate just how unpredictable politics is. As Professor Barnes likes to say, the future is never a straight-line projection of the present. This is true in life, culture, economics, and politics. A corollary is that presidents almost never govern in the manner in which they campaigned. Stuff happens. Woodrow Wilson ran for reelection on a peace platform. FDR ran as a fiscal conservative. George H.W. Bush promised he wouldn't raise taxes. George W. Bush said the United States ought not to "nation build." In each case, events interfered.

So, as we examine Obama's economic policy proposals, we ought to look at them with a skeptical eye. Many of the proposals won't become law. Others will be modified beyond recognition. Still others will be cast aside, as unforeseen developments force the rejection of old ideas and the adoption of new ones. The economy could worsen. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could worsen. The United States could become involved in new conflicts in Darfur, Iran, Pakistan, the Korean peninsula, Taiwan, or someplace no one has ever heard of. Al Qaeda could strike again. And don't forget Putin.

There are, however, a few basics we can take for granted. If Obama is elected president in a few weeks, not only is enrollment in this class going to spike, but federal taxes, spending, and the deficit--at least in the short term--are all going to rise....

...

Kathianne
10-12-2008, 08:00 AM
This is related to the above post, as indeed it looks like he would have to confine himself to mostly his 'not so bad' proposals:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/bigger_and_bigger_challenges_w.html


October 12, 2008
Bigger and Bigger Challenges Would Greet Obama
By David Broder

WASHINGTON -- The good news for Barack Obama is that the calamities in the financial world may have created an insuperable barrier to John McCain's White House ambitions.

The bad news is that Obama stands to inherit the leadership of a country in far worse condition than he could have imagined when he began this campaign almost two years ago.

The short-term drama of the Wall Street implosion has been so compelling that its larger implications have been neglected. When you are worried about how many hundreds of points the Dow has shed and which banks may go belly-up, it is difficult to focus your sights on the Big Picture.

But it is now clear that even if the tourniquets applied by Congress, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve stop the bleeding of our capital and credit systems, this country will be paying the price for its folly for a very long time....

... A few forward-looking Democrats have begun to focus on what could be the first test for a President Obama with a Congress controlled by his own party: whether to insist on a paygo rule for the budget.

That rule, which provided the discipline behind the Clinton administration's balanced budgets, was abandoned by the Republicans -- with disastrous fiscal results. It was revived last year when the Democrats took over Congress. But the requirement that any new or increased spending be offset by comparable cuts or new revenues has been a source of frustration for many in the party. And it will pinch much harder if applied next year.

No easy choices will be available to the next president. If Obama wins, he may have the shortest honeymoon in history.