PDA

View Full Version : CNN lies during Palin interview



theHawk
10-22-2008, 10:22 PM
As if we needed more proof the liberal media in this country puts state run media in communist nations to shame, we get this cherry from none other than CNN.

In a blantant misquote in an attempt to ambush Palin during an interview, Griffen completely takes a quote from a conservative out of contex. Thankfully Palin had the smarts to call him on it. No retraction yet from the "best name in news".

York was actually critizing the liberal media's unfair treatment of Palin, a 9 year old would be able to understand that by reading the actual quote. So either Griffen is thousand times dumber than they accuse Palin of being, or he is just another liberal gas-bag for Obama who is willing to lie to try to destroy Palin.

The QUOTE:


Griffin said to Gov. Palin: "Governor, you've been mocked in the press, the press has been pretty hard on you, the Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, ‘I can't tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above.'"

This is a complete distortion, a falsehood. The full quote from the National Review's Byron York shows he was in fact dressing down the media, NOT Gov. Palin. "Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it's sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or - or, well, all of the above."

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2008/10/22/mrc-nbs-bozell-comments-cnns-misquoting-national-review-slam-gov-palin

Palin immediately went on to question Griffin who wrote the supposed quote, and Griffen immediately became a studdering moron and couldn't even name who supposedly said it. Great journalism CNN.

Yurt
10-22-2008, 11:35 PM
busted

stephanie
10-22-2008, 11:40 PM
the media has dropped all pretense of being balanced and non biased this election...

the lamestream media is not ever to be trusted again..they have become an enemy to the people of the United States..

I hope the American people have been paying attention..

hjmick
10-22-2008, 11:46 PM
the media has dropped all pretense of being balanced and non biased this election...

the lamestream media is not ever to be trusted again..they have become an enemy to the people of the United States..

I hope the American people have been paying attention..

Former Newsweek reporter Michael Hastings wrote an Op|Ed that speaks to this topic:

HACK: CONFESSIONS OF A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN REPORTER (http://men.style.com/gq/features/full?id=content_7484)

gabosaurus
10-23-2008, 12:12 AM
Quoting from the extreme right-wing blog again. Ho-hum.

Psychoblues
10-23-2008, 12:35 AM
newsbusters,,,,,,,,,,figures right in, doesn't it?!?!?!?!???!?!??!

:salute::cheers2::clap::laugh2::cheers2::salute:

stephanie
10-23-2008, 12:41 AM
PB and gabs has a lot of room to talk about what sites people post from..

gabby post from some freak called rudepundit..and the psycho post from the Hufferpost...

newsbuster is way more credible then them two ever will be..

Psychoblues
10-23-2008, 01:40 AM
Whining doesn't become you, stevie.




PB and gabs has a lot of room to talk about what sites people post from..

gabby post from some freak called rudepundit..and the psycho post from the Hufferpost...

newsbuster is way more credible then them two ever will be..

And I did not post anything in this thread from Hufferpost.

Who the hell is Hufferpost? Another figment of your fertile imagination?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!

:salute::cheers2::clap::laugh2::cheers2::salute:

theHawk
10-23-2008, 08:25 AM
Quoting from the extreme right-wing blog again. Ho-hum.

The quotes are 100% accurate. There is even video of it, go watch it on YouTube. Nice try at deflection.

theHawk
10-23-2008, 08:43 AM
Here's more sources since suddenly you care so much -


Transcript of the video clip-



DREW GRIFFIN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Governor, you've been mocked in the press. The press has been pretty hard on you. The Democrats have been pretty hard on you. But also, some conservatives have been pretty hard on you, as well. "The National Review" had a story saying that, you know, I can't tell if Sarah Palin is "incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above."

GOV. SARAH PALIN (R-AK), VICE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: Who wrote that one?

GRIFFIN: That was in "The National Review."

PALIN: Who wrote it?

GRIFFIN: I don't have the author, but they were...

PALIN: I'd like to talk to that person.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,443712,00.html


More....



After nearly two months since she was announced as the GOP Veep candidate, Gov. Sarah Palin sat down for an interview on CNN yesterday. But one of correspondent Drew Griffin's questions has become a focus, after it misrepresented a recent Byron York column in the National Review (via Breitbart.TV).
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn/griffin_misquotes_national_review_column_during_pa lin_interview_98242.asp?c=rss


The actual York article:


Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or — or, well, all of the above. Palin, the governor of Alaska, has faced more criticism than any vice-presidential candidate since 1988, when Democrats and the press tore into Dan Quayle. In fact, Palin may have it even worse than Quayle, since she’s taking flak not only from Democrats and the press but from some conservative opinion leaders as well.

After John McCain unexpectedly chose Palin as his running mate, reporters raced to Alaska to look into her family life, including her teenage daughter’s pregnancy; into her per diem expense requests; into her controversial firing of the state’s public-safety commissioner; into her husband’s role as informal adviser; into the gifts she received; and into much more. Those investigations have yielded hundreds of stories. But Palin’s time in the governor’s office hasn’t been all, or even mostly, family drama and minor controversy. She was also, lest we forget, the state’s chief executive. So, what did she do every day? How deeply involved was she in the workings of government? What were her priorities?

And also: Before Palin moved into the governor’s office, she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, population 7,028. How did she adjust to a big new job? Was she up to it? What was her learning curve? Discovering how she made that transition could tell us how she might handle becoming vice president.

Yes, there are legitimate concerns about Palin’s lack of experience. Who wouldn’t, at the very least, wish that she had more time in the governor’s office on her résumé? But a look at Palin’s 20 months in power, along with interviews with people who worked with her, shows her to be a serious executive, a governor who picked important things to do and got them done — and who didn’t just stumble into an 80 percent job-approval rating.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjEyMzk3MWU4Yzk1NGQyMWYwZjk0OTcyNmEzYTM5N2E=&w=MA==#more





More, the vid as well:

http://www.observer.com/2008/media/drew-griffin-lands-cnns-first-interview-palin?page=2




And they're not happy over at the Hillary forums!!!
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=37731

theHawk
10-23-2008, 08:49 AM
CNN sources as well, the most trusted name in news!!


CNN: Yeah. Governor, you've been mocked in the press. The press has been pretty hard on you, the Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, I can't tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above.

Palin: Who wrote that one?

CNN: That was in the National Review, I don't, have the author.

Palin: I'd like to talk to that person.

CNN: But they were talking about the fact that your experience as governor is not getting out. Do you feel trapped in this campaign, that your message is not getting out, and if so who do you blame?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/21/palin.sitroom.transcript/

Classact
10-23-2008, 09:59 AM
McCain should make a public statement about CNN's coverage and refer people who agree with him that CNN was very unfair to go to his website.

On his website he should list all the advertisers for CNN and ask all people that agree CNN was unfair to call the advertisers to demand that CNN announce hourly retractions and take out full page ads on all newspapers up to the election or the advertisers will be boycotted.

Little-Acorn
10-23-2008, 10:17 AM
Nothing particularly new about incidents like this.

Recall when Newt Gingrich described how he wanted to form a new, stronger government agency to run Social Security, which could resolve conflicts and get more people the benefits they had been promised all their lives. Once that new agency was running things, he said, the old SS agency didn't have to be abruptly shut down, but could be left to "wither on the vine".

The unbiased media immediately began screaming that "Gingrich says Social Security should be abandoned and left to wither on the vine!!!" And that "story" gained wide circulation and was repeatedly reported as "truth" on every news channel and outlet.

The difference between then and now?

Now, the media's lie was caught and debunked much more quickly.

red states rule
10-24-2008, 05:18 AM
Quoting from the extreme right-wing blog again. Ho-hum.

Just can't bring yourself to admit he lied eh? Well here is his admission Gabby


CNN’s Griffin Acknowledges ‘Botched’ National Review Quotation
By Matthew Balan
October 23, 2008 - 23:30 ET

CNN investigative correspondent Drew Griffin appeared on Thursday’s Newsroom and Situation Room programs to explain how "in no way did I intend to misquote" from a recent article by National Review’s Byron York: "This exchange aired just once in the 6 pm hour, and as soon as the National Review brought it to our attention at 7:05, we immediately realized the context could be misconstrued. We cut that portion of the interview. It never aired again." Griffin also mentioned how he had "since called Byron York and his editor Rich Lowry, explained what happened, and told them both that I regret any harm this may have brought."

In an interview excerpt aired on Tuesday's Situation Room (NB post with video), Griffin had told Sarah Palin: “The National Review had a story saying that, you know, 'I can't tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above.'” In fact, York was mocking media coverage of Palin: “Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for Vice President, it's sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward or -- well, all of the above."

Griffin first appeared seven minutes into the 2 pm Eastern hour of Newsroom. Anchor Kyra Phillips asked the correspondent about the criticism he had received over the misquotation. He played a clip of the question, and explained the impression he had of the interview overall. He then played the initial exchange he had with Governor Palin over the "botched" quote, and most of her answer.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2008/10/23/cnn-s-drew-griffin-apologizes-botched-quotation-national-review

theHawk
10-24-2008, 08:22 AM
Its funny how CNN refused to even comment on it the entire day. It wasn't until after O'Reilly slammed CNN did they suddenly give a shit.

red states rule
10-24-2008, 08:24 AM
Its funny how CNN refused to even comment on it the entire day. It wasn't until after O'Reilly slammed CNN did they suddenly give a shit.

It explains why CNN's Jack Cafferty is always taking shots at Fox News