PDA

View Full Version : Winnetka, IL repeals gun ban



Little-Acorn
11-19-2008, 01:15 PM
Another one bites the dust.

One of the most beneficial results of the Bush presidency, is his appointment of law-abiding judges and justices to the Federal courts. They provided the crucial difference that let the DC v. Heller case get to the Supreme Court and ultimately be won.

Now a number of towns are seeing the handwriting on the wall: The 2nd amendment means what it says, and gun bans are unconstitutional. The courts are no longer covering up for it. The towns can fight in court, and probably lose. Or they can just repeal their unconstitutional gun laws now, and save some money.

A great quote from the Winnetka city council guy: "The village has a significant financial risk in keeping the ban in place..."

Hey, bonehead. The village has a lot more than just a financial risk. Places with gun bans tend to get more of their residents KILLED than places where citizens are allowed to defend themselves, and crimes are deterred before they even take place. Looks like you still don't understand that, so the courts now have to force you to do the right thing. Well, it's still progress.

Welcome to reality.

-----------------------------------------------

http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/11/winnetka-repeals-handgun-ban.html

Winnetka repeals handgun ban

November 19, 2008 at 7:25 AM

Winnetka Village Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to repeal the suburb's 20-year-old ban on possessing handguns but kept intact other portions of its ordinance regulating firearm use, council President Edmund Woodbury said this morning.

The action followed a recent Supreme Court decision and the filing of a lawsuit by the National Rifle Association and three village residents who asserted the ban violated their 2nd Amendment rights.

"The council voted unanimously to repeal the sections in our ordinance that had been the subject of the lawsuit by the NRA," Woodbury said.

"The village has a significant financial risk in keeping the ban in place, and given that, we felt it best to allow the national debate on this subject is settled."

Council members said they feared if they didn't repeal portions of the ordinance, it would cost the suburb thousands of dollars to fight the suit with the real risk of still losing in court.

About 20 people residents spoke for and against repealing the ban on handgun possession Tuesday, Woodbury said.

Village officials established the ban shortly after a mentally ill woman, Laurie Dann, shot to death one child and injured five others at Hubbard Woods Elementary School in 1988.

In the Chicago area, five suburbs-including Wilmette, Evanston, Morton Grove and Oak Park-had gun bans at the time of the Supreme Court ruling and have now taken similar measures to repeal them.

Des
11-19-2008, 01:24 PM
I'm not a Bush fan, but I am no fan of gun bans, either. I don't understand the (lack of) logic behind them, as criminals aren't going to abide by the laws anyway, automatically giving them a one-up on law-abiding citizens.

Binky
11-19-2008, 01:51 PM
Rather than ripping the weapons out from under the citizens who are not harming anyone, they should be trying to find ways to keep them out of the hands of the criminals.

The only thing a gun ban will do is to allow criminals an easier way to do their nasty deeds without fear of having their nuts shot off. In the meantime, it will make the law abiding citizen more sucessible to the varments that love to prey on others.

Like a lot of these idiotic laws that are created, nothing good will come of it.

Mr. P
11-19-2008, 02:12 PM
I'm not a Bush fan, but I am no fan of gun bans, either. I don't understand the (lack of) logic behind them, as criminals aren't going to abide by the laws anyway, automatically giving them a one-up on law-abiding citizens.

What's Bush have to do with it?

Des
11-19-2008, 02:29 PM
What's Bush have to do with it?

"One of the most beneficial results of the Bush presidency..."

Mr. P
11-19-2008, 02:47 PM
"One of the most beneficial results of the Bush presidency..."

He didn't rule on the case..

Des
11-19-2008, 02:49 PM
He didn't rule on the case..

Do you really think I am stupid enough not to understand that?

Little-Acorn
11-19-2008, 03:18 PM
Do you really think I am stupid enough not to understand that?

Would you two mind taking your little cat fight to another thread dedicated to such interesting phenomena?

Back to the subject:
The people who pass these gun control laws, constantly entertain the notion that banning guns will eliminate all guns. They constantly ignore how well that worked for drugs, how well it worked for alcohol in the 20s, etc. Even this city council person seems to believe it - he makes no mention of the idea that maybe having law-abiding citizens able to carry arms, will protect those citizens and result in a net reduction in crime.

The good news is, the leftists are losing their grip on the media, and people are starting to realize what the results of their policies are... and how different the results are, from the promises.

The result is the election of people like GWB, even despite his obvious failings (huge spending, new entitlements, supporting bailouts, mispronouncing "nuclear" etc.), due to his determination to appoint judges who decide cases this way.

Mr. P
11-19-2008, 03:41 PM
Would you two mind taking your little cat fight to another thread dedicated to such interesting phenomena?

Back to the subject:
The people who pass these gun control laws, constantly entertain the notion that banning guns will eliminate all guns. They constantly ignore how well that worked for drugs, how well it worked for alcohol in the 20s, etc. Even this city council person seems to believe it - he makes no mention of the idea that maybe having law-abiding citizens able to carry arms, will protect those citizens and result in a net reduction in crime.

The good news is, the leftists are losing their grip on the media, and people are starting to realize what the results of their policies are... and how different the results are, from the promises.

The result is the election of people like GWB, even despite his obvious failings (huge spending, new entitlements, supporting bailouts, mispronouncing "nuclear" etc.), due to his determination to appoint judges who decide cases this way.

:laugh2: No fight..DES just suggests Bush had something to do with the court ruling..just looking for clarification...In the future mind yer own business..K?:slap:

Des
11-19-2008, 04:05 PM
:laugh2: No fight..DES just suggests Bush had something to do with the court ruling..just looking for clarification...In the future mind yer own business..K?:slap:

No, I didn't...I am new to this board, so I was trying to clarify that I agree with the op, minus the "Bush has a positive influence" part.

Mr. P
11-19-2008, 04:15 PM
No, I didn't...I am new to this board, so I was trying to clarify that I agree with the op, minus the "Bush has a positive influence" part.

Got it..thanks. :beer: