PDA

View Full Version : Jury convicts mom of lesser charges in online hoax



LiberalNation
11-27-2008, 01:37 AM
Think she should have gotten off.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081127/ap_on_re_us/internet_suicide;_ylt=ApapLQv455aGF8a_gVqHM7tvzwcF

LOS ANGELES – A Missouri mother on trial in a landmark cyberbullying case was convicted Wednesday of only three minor offenses for her role in a mean-spirited Internet hoax that apparently drove a 13-year-old girl to suicide. The federal jury could not reach a verdict on the main charge against 49-year-old Lori Drew — conspiracy — and rejected three other felony counts of accessing computers without authorization to inflict emotional harm.

Instead, the panel found Drew guilty of three misdemeanor offenses of accessing computers without authorization. Each count is punishable by up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine. Drew could have gotten 20 years if convicted of the four original charges.

U.S. District Judge George Wu declared a mistrial on the conspiracy count. There was no immediate word on whether prosecutors would retry her.
"I don't have any satisfaction in the jury's decision," said Drew's lawyer, Dean Steward. "I don't think these charges should have ever been brought."

Tina Meier, the mother of the dead girl, said Drew deserves the maximum of three years behind bars.

"For me it's never been about vengeance," she said. "This is about justice."

Prosecutors said Drew and two others created a fictitious 16-year-old boy on MySpace and sent flirtatious messages from him to teenage neighbor Megan Meier. The "boy" then dumped Megan in 2006, saying, "The world would be a better place without you." Megan promptly hanged herself with a belt in her bedroom closet.

Prosecutors said Drew wanted to humiliate Megan for saying mean things about Drew's teenage daughter. They said Drew knew Megan suffered from depression and was emotionally fragile.

"Lori Drew decided to humiliate a child," U.S. Attorney Thomas O'Brien, chief federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, told the jury during closing arguments. "The only way she could harm this pretty little girl was with a computer. She chose to use a computer to hurt a little girl, and for four weeks she enjoyed it."

O'Brien, who pronounced the case the nation's first cyberbullying trial, said the jury's decision sent a worthy message: "If you have children who are on the Internet and you are not watching what they are doing, you better be."

Most members of the six-man, six-woman jury left court without speaking to reporters. One juror, who identified himself by his first name only, Marcilo, indicated jurors were not convinced Drew's actions involved the intent alleged by prosecutors.

"Some of the jurors just felt strongly that it wasn't tortious and everybody needed to stay with their feeling. That was really the balancing point," he said.

Des
11-27-2008, 01:40 AM
Good, this woman needs to face the music. How is doing something to someone she knows to be real and disturbed...and a minor...online any different than doing it in real life? She set out to harm a child. Even if that child hasn't taken her life, she'd still be wrong.

LiberalNation
11-27-2008, 01:46 AM
Cyber bullying happens all the time on this forum and across the net. The standards of real life have never really applied. Some of ya'll would be in for some trouble if they were. Slippery slope.

Des
11-27-2008, 01:49 AM
Cyber bullying happens all the time on this forum and across the net. The standards of real life have never really applied. Some of ya'll would be in for some trouble if they were. Slippery slope.

There is a huge difference between a woman using the internet as a tool to inflict harm on a minor she knows, seeking this person out with the intent to bully them and engaging in debate with an anonomous person on a debate forum.

LiberalNation
11-27-2008, 01:52 AM
Not so much, you purposly go after someone with the intent of upsetting them, they have publically stated on the board they are a teenagers, they then kill themselves, parents track you down and want justice. How mean you were to that poor kid, off with your head.

Des
11-27-2008, 02:03 AM
Not so much, you purposly go after someone with the intent of upsetting them, they have publically stated on the board they are a teenagers, they then kill themselves, parents track you down and want justice. How mean you were to that poor kid, off with your head.

There IS a huge difference. The medium doesn't matter.

There is only so much harm I can do to -insert fake member here- without knowing them in person. If I met this person on an online board and grew to dislike them so much I wished them harm, and then that intent translated into real-life actions with real-life consequences, it would even be a little different than what happened here.

A woman knew a teenager. She used the internet as a tool to bully this child. The fact that people communicate on the internet all the time doesn't really matter...people drive cars all the time without waiting outside someones home so they can intentionally collide with that person. She intentionally victimized a real live minor who she had some sort of real life relationship with online and caused emotional harm to that person. It doesn't matter that this girl killed herself...it matters that an adult willingly bullied a child and shouldn't get away with it because she did it online vs. in the flesh.

LiberalNation
11-27-2008, 02:07 AM
...it matters that an adult willingly bullied a child and shouldn't get away with it because she did it online vs. in the flesh.
and I'm saying you don't have to personally know the child in real life to willingly bully a child online. It's not much of a stretch to say you are equeally as cupable as this woman.

5stringJeff
11-27-2008, 11:12 AM
This woman deserves every minute of jail time she gets.