PDA

View Full Version : Don't throw away leftovers, warn 'food police'



stephanie
01-12-2009, 12:23 AM
good grief..

Householders are to be visited by officials offering advice on cooking with leftovers, in a Government initiative to reduce the amount of food that gets thrown away.

By Jasper Copping
Last Updated: 10:22PM GMT 10 Jan 2009

Home cooks will also be told what size portions to prepare, taught to understand "best before" dates and urged to make more use of their freezers.

The door-to-door campaign, which starts tomorrow, will be funded by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a Government agency charged with reducing household waste.

The officials will be called "food champions". However, they were dismissed last night as "food police" by critics who called the scheme an example of "excessive government nannying".

In an initial seven-week trial, eight officials will call at 24,500 homes, dishing out advice and recipes. The officials, each of whom has received a day's training, will paid up to £8.49 an hour, with a bonus for working on Saturdays.

The pilot scheme, which will cost £30,000, could be extended nationwide if it is seen as a success. If all 25 million households in the UK were visited in the same way, 8,000 officials would be required at a cost of tens of millions of pounds.

Peter Ainsworth, the shadow environment secretary, said: "You might have thought, at a time of economic hardship, that spending public money on stating the obvious is hardly a priority. With household budgets under pressure, most people are looking to spend wisely and waste less anyway."

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance said: "This is a prime example of excessive Government nannying, and a waste of public money and resources. In the grip of a recession, the last thing people need is someone bossing them about in their own kitchen.

"Worse still, the money for this scheme will come directly out of taxpayers' pockets, at a time when they need every penny to weather the financial storm."

Snip:
Tim Burns, from Waste Watch - the contractor carrying out the scheme for WRAP - said: "Food waste has such a high impact on climate change and it is something we can all do something about."

He defended the amount of paper that would be used by the 24,500 leaflets produced by the scheme.

"The small booklet gives a range of tips and signposts the campaign website to get more information. If the leaflet helps residents reduce their waste, that is a lot better for the environment."

read the rest..
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/4214024/Dont-throw-away-leftovers-warn-food-police.html

Little-Acorn
01-12-2009, 12:54 AM
Oh, OK, this silliness is from England, a country already lost to socialism and the idea that government must control all.

No big deal.

Interesting, though, how eagerly they use the unfounded excuse of global warming and the fallacy that man can do anything to change climate, as a reason to spend more and more govt money and impose more restrictions.

"Do it for the children" apparently didn't work. So now they're trying "Do it for the climate".

johnney
01-24-2009, 09:41 PM
now thats something you would see in a tabloid

PostmodernProphet
01-25-2009, 07:27 AM
don't discout it so quickly....Obama's going to need something for all those job corp folks to do once the litter on the streets get's picked up.......

Kathianne
01-25-2009, 07:30 AM
don't discout it so quickly....Obama's going to need something for all those job corp folks to do once the litter on the streets get's picked up.......

That's what I was thinking, exactly. That's 'putting people to work', sheesh. I'd never let a government employee into my home for such nonsense.

PostmodernProphet
01-25-2009, 07:40 AM
there was another guy who thought we needed to expand the people working for the government.....for a full round of rep points, who will be the first to identify this person without googling the text?......


We find our population suffering from the old inequalities, little changed by our past sporadic remedies. In spite of our effort and in spite of our talk, we have not weeded out the overprivileged and we have not effectively lifted up the underprivileged....We have...a clear mandate from the people, that Americans must forswear the conception of the acquisition of wealth which, through excessive profits, creates undue private power over private affairs and, to our misfortune, over public affairs as well. In building toward this end we do not destroy ambition, nor do we seek to divide our wealth into equal shares on stated occasions. We continue to recognize the greater ability of some to earn more than others. But we do assert that the ambition of the individual to obtain for him and his a proper security, a reasonable leisure, and a decent living throughout life is an ambition to be preferred to the appetite for great wealth and great power.










for those who can't resist peeking
http://www.wwcd.org/policy/US/newdeal.html#FTNTS

Kathianne
01-25-2009, 07:47 AM
I'm guessing FDR?



there was another guy who thought we needed to expand the people working for the government.....for a full round of rep points, who will be the first to identify this person without googling the text?......












for those who can't resist peeking
http://www.wwcd.org/policy/US/newdeal.html#FTNTS

Kathianne
01-25-2009, 07:49 AM
I'm guessing FDR?

Cool, I was right! I didn't see the linky at the bottom.

PostmodernProphet
01-25-2009, 12:57 PM
I can't give you your prize till I spread it around....

have you fulfilled your commitment to forswearing the acquisition of wealth as all good Americans should?......beware, it creates undue private power over private affairs!

Kathianne
01-25-2009, 02:03 PM
I can't give you your prize till I spread it around....

have you fulfilled your commitment to forswearing the acquisition of wealth as all good Americans should?......beware, it creates undue private power over private affairs!

Yeah, I have that problem going nearly all the time. I'm afraid I'm going with the acquisition of wealth, due to my salary and my debt. :laugh2: However, if my circumstances were to change, hell no!

Abbey Marie
01-25-2009, 03:42 PM
If someone came to my door to tell me how to use my own food, I would take great pleasure in throwing a pie in his face.

And as a bonus, I could always say throwing it saved it from ending up in the trash.

If this kind of intrusion into my life ever starts here, I may have to go Libertarian after all. (Did you hear that Emmett?!)