PDA

View Full Version : Nullification of the COTUS?



glockmail
02-23-2009, 08:47 AM
That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html


New Hampshire state House Representative Daniel Itse has stirred the political pot with his bill, House Concurrent Resolution 6: “A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles”, under which New Hampshire would secede from the United States if the federal government attempts additional usurpation of power under five specific circumstances, including “Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition…”
In an interview with Alex Jones of infowars.com, Rep. Itse made particular mention of a gun control bill HR 45: “Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009” as being an example of such usurpation, noting that “if the government chooses to aggress in nullifying the Constitution, it is impossible to secede from something that doesn’t exist.”
http://www.examiner.com/x-2698-Charlotte-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m2d16-Guns-and-the-Constitution-A-legislator-finally-gets-it

avatar4321
02-23-2009, 05:31 PM
Im going to keep an eye on this one.

5stringJeff
02-23-2009, 06:42 PM
Montana threatened to secede if Heller had gone the other way. If New Hampshire is serious about this, maybe it will get someone's attention.

Abbey Marie
02-23-2009, 11:45 PM
I get the feeling that things have changed permanently in the US. There is no turning back.

DannyR
02-23-2009, 11:52 PM
I get the feeling this will have as much impact as the Conche Republic.

http://www.conchrepublic.com/

That is to say, none at all. Just the news story of the day.

glockmail
02-24-2009, 09:48 AM
I get the feeling that things have changed permanently in the US. There is no turning back. Slavery was permanent once.

Abbey Marie
02-24-2009, 11:16 AM
Slavery was permanent once.

I think you missed my point.

glockmail
02-24-2009, 07:00 PM
I think you missed my point.Perhaps you missed mine. A policy that appeared permanent was finally overthrown by violent means. That may be what is needed now.