PDA

View Full Version : Obama Seeks $1 Trillion Tax Increase in Budget Plan



red states rule
02-27-2009, 09:38 AM
These tax increases will make things much worse

Higher taxes on investors and companies wil result in higher unemployment means more people on the welfare rolls. More people on welfare means more government spending. More government spending means higher deficits. Higher deficits leads inflation and less economic growth. Less economic growth means people and companies cutting back spending and investment

Obama is scaring the hell out of Wall St and investors, The Dow is tanking again this morning as they see how much damage Obama and the Dems will cause



Obama Seeks $1 Trillion Tax Increase in Budget Plan

Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama proposed almost $1 trillion in higher taxes over the next decade on the highest-earning Americans, Wall Street financiers, U.S.-based multinational corporations and oil companies to pay for permanent tax breaks for lower earners.

Obama’s 2010 budget proposal, released today, would reinstate the top two Clinton-era tax rates of 36 percent and 39.6 percent, up from the 33 percent and 35 percent the richest Americans now pay. That would affect about 2.6 million taxpayers. The budget also would raise taxes on capital gains and dividends to 20 percent for top earners, up from the 15 percent set by former President George W. Bush in 2003.

The tax increases, which Obama vowed to impose as a presidential candidate, would take effect in 2011 and be the first on high-income earners since 1993. They also would reverse a course set by Bush of lowering the tax burden on the nation’s wealthiest people.

‘Obama Robin Hood’

“It’s a clear repudiation of Bush’s policy,” said Peter Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland in College Park. “It’s more Obama Robin Hood.”

Obama’s budget would keep in place Bush’s tax cuts that benefit lower- and middle-income earners, and it preserves a sliver of policy that benefits the more affluent: A preferential tax rate on corporate dividends. Before Bush, dividends were taxed as ordinary income, at rates as high as 39.6 percent in the 1990s.

“It is a hugely positive step to keep that part of the ‘03 changes,” said Pamela Olson, who was the top tax official in Bush’s Treasury Department when the tax rate on dividends was reduced. “It’s good economic policy, good corporate governance policy and good tax policy.”

Obama also proposes to stop the scheduled repeal of the estate tax next year and to impose a 45 percent tax rate on a married couple’s estate valued at more than $7 million.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aFsqsDD7lF1Y&refer=home

PostmodernProphet
02-27-2009, 11:57 AM
a 3.6% increase on the top wage bracket is only a drop in the bucket measured against the spending the Dems have passed or proposed in the last 90 days....how does he propose to pay for the rest of it?.......

Mr. P
02-27-2009, 12:46 PM
a 3.6% increase on the top wage bracket is only a drop in the bucket measured against the spending the Dems have passed or proposed in the last 90 days....how does he propose to pay for the rest of it?.......

2010

Obama: " Friends as we said.... we would....we did increase taxes on those able to pay...and cut tax for 95% of everyone else.....unfortunately...and unforeseen...consumer prices increased...and you stopped spending...employers continue layoffs...... We now find ourselves in a deep economic recession....and our only choice is to REPEAL the tax cut for the 95%.....so, effective immediately taxes will be retroactive to the 2009 levels.....I'm sorry but things "CHANGE". "

PostmodernProphet
02-27-2009, 01:28 PM
2010

so the plan is to spend $0 in 2010?.....I hadn't realized that.....

Mr. P
02-27-2009, 01:31 PM
so the plan is to spend $0 in 2010?.....I hadn't realized that.....

No...it's just that's when he'll spring the news on 95% of the suckers. Gotta get all the spending in place first.

Joe Steel
02-27-2009, 05:37 PM
Higher taxes will give all these "wealth producers" an incentive to work harder and they'll get richer because of higher taxes.

Yurt
02-27-2009, 07:55 PM
Higher taxes will give all these "wealth producers" an incentive to work harder and they'll get richer because of higher taxes.

:poke:

red states rule
02-28-2009, 10:11 PM
Libs and Obama lovers constantly talk about the greed of Wall St. To me, the real greed is the desire of liberals to suck more money from the pockets of people of drive the economy

I asked a liberal Kool Aid drinker, and infamous poster; when is enough enough as far as how much in taxes the so called righ should pay. He replied "as much as we can squeeze out of them"

That tax policy is the official policy of the Obama, Ried, and Pelosi administration

5stringJeff
03-02-2009, 07:50 PM
Higher taxes will give all these "wealth producers" an incentive to work harder and they'll get richer because of higher taxes.

You have got to be the most ass-backwards thinker I've ever met. Higher taxes discourage work, because you keep less of what you earn.

PostmodernProphet
03-02-2009, 09:16 PM
recall the story about Bloomberg and his dispute with the governor of New York about raising city taxes......he argued, out of 8 million people in New York, 40,000 pay 60% of the New York city income taxes....if he raises the income tax will it cause 1000 people to move out of the city?.....4000?.....10,000?.....how big of a hit does he dare take?.....he can't risk losing a fourth of his tax base.....