Iran Has ANOTHER Nuclear Facility

[red states rule]

So Obama said 'we will turn the page' with Little Adolf in Iran. I bet Obama will give him another stern warning over this



U.S. to Accuse Iran of Building Secret Nuke Plant

Iran revealed the existence of a covert uranium enrichment facility to the U.N. nuclear watchdog this week after it discovered the project's secrecy had been breached by Western intelligence agencies, FOX News has learned.

The U.S., Britain and France will accuse Iran on Friday morning of building the facility underground in secret and charge that it has hidden the facility for years from international weapons inspectors, a senior White House official said.

At an announcement before the opening of the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh, President Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy will demand weapons inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency be granted immediate access to the facility.

An official told FOX News that Iran revealed the existence of the second plant


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555303,00.html

[theHawk]

So Obama said 'we will turn the page' with Little Adolf in Iran. I bet Obama will give him another stern warning over this



U.S. to Accuse Iran of Building Secret Nuke Plant

Iran revealed the existence of a covert uranium enrichment facility to the U.N. nuclear watchdog this week after it discovered the project's secrecy had been breached by Western intelligence agencies, FOX News has learned.

The U.S., Britain and France will accuse Iran on Friday morning of building the facility underground in secret and charge that it has hidden the facility for years from international weapons inspectors, a senior White House official said.

At an announcement before the opening of the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh, President Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy will demand weapons inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency be granted immediate access to the facility.

An official told FOX News that Iran revealed the existence of the second plant


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555303,00.html



Its far more likely Obama will defend Iran's nuclear ambitions by taking the advice of former Democratic putz Zbigniew Brzezinski, who says we should shoot down any Israeli airplanes flying over Iraq on their way to bomb Iran's nuke facilities.

The same Zbigniew Brzezinski that advised Carter in every blunder he commited in Middle Eastern policies.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/09/brezinski_calls_for_obama_to_s.asp



DB: How aggressive can Obama be in insisting to the Israelis that a military strike might be in America’s worst interest?

Brzezinski: We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?

DB: What if they fly over anyway?

Brzezinski: Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.

[red states rule]

Its far more likely Obama will defend Iran's nuclear ambitions by taking the advice of former Democratic putz Zbigniew Brzezinski, who says we should shoot down any Israeli airplanes flying over Iraq on their way to bomb Iran's nuke facilities.

The same Zbigniew Brzezinski that advised Carter in every blunder he commited in Middle Eastern policies.

And it is possible Obama will order AG Holder to investigate intel officials on what methods they used to obtain this information

While that is going on, Obama will offer to sit down with Little Adolf with, of course, no preconditions

[Kathianne]

Obama is not interested in something as mundane as 'Victory':

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PD6nMxYcmjE&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PD6nMxYcmjE&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Heck, Obama is scaring the French:

http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/learning-to-love-the-french-when-sarkozy-spoke-truth-to-obama/


... Nicolas Sarkozy. Here’s his wakeup call, in the UN’s translation from the French:


“We are here to guarantee peace. We are right to talk about the future. But the present comes before the future, and the present includes two major nuclear crises. The peoples of the entire world are listening to what we are saying, including our promises, commitments and speeches. But we live in the real world, not in a virtual one.

We say that we must reduce. President Obama himself has said that he dreams of a world without nuclear weapons. Before our very eyes, two countries are doing exactly the opposite at this very moment. Since 2005, Iran has violated five Security Council Resolutions. [Ed note: Sarkozy then listed international proposals for dialogue with Iran attempted in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009.] I support America’s extended hand. But what have these proposals for dialogue produced for the international community? Nothing but more enriched uranium and more centrifuges. And last but not least, it has resulted in a statement by Iranian leaders calling for wiping off the map a Member of the United Nations. What are we to do? What conclusion are we to draw? At a certain moment hard facts will force us to take decisions.

… Secondly, there is North Korea — and there it is even more striking. It has violated every Security Council decision since 1993. It pays absolutely no attention to what the international community says. Even more, it continues ballistic missile testing. How can we accept that? What conclusions should we draw? …”

You can read President Sarkozy’s entire statement here (in all its Defcon 1 relevance to the disclosures Friday of another Iranian uranium enrichment plant hidden on a military base near Qom) – click on this link to Security Council meetings for 2009, then click on the link for “Meeting Record” of Sept 24th and scroll to page 12.

[red states rule]

Obama is not interested in something as mundane as 'Victory':

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PD6nMxYcmjE&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PD6nMxYcmjE&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Heck, Obama is scaring the French:

http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/learning-to-love-the-french-when-sarkozy-spoke-truth-to-obama/


Like much of his base and rabid supporters - the ONLY victory that is important is a victory over Republicans

To most on the left - they are the real enemies

[emmett]

Nothing we shouldn't be able to fix with a little dialogue huh?

[red states rule]

Nothing we shouldn't be able to fix with a little dialogue huh?

Maybe another beer summit is in the works