PDA

View Full Version : Joe vs Jose



Bonnie
04-13-2010, 09:16 AM
You have two families: "Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal".
Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".


Ready? Now pay attention...


Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.

Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or
$31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has
$31,200.00.


Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.

Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has
$31,200.00.


Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.


Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.

Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose
Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.


Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.


Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.

Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities,
gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.


Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support ANY politician that supports illegal aliens...YOU are part of the problem!

MtnBiker
04-13-2010, 09:33 AM
What if Jose illegal was made legal?

crin63
04-13-2010, 09:41 AM
What if Jose illegal was made legal?

He would become a protected class of person in order to create another voting block for government giveaways.

MtnBiker
04-13-2010, 09:50 AM
He would become a protected class of person in order to create another voting block for government giveaways.

Well that is a possibility.

Is conservatism such a weak idea that immigrants would not embrace the values and beliefs of conservatism? Or are we to assume immigrants will only embrace and be welcomed by big government types?

Bonnie
04-13-2010, 02:32 PM
What if Jose illegal was made legal?

At the very least he would have to pay the same taxes as Joe, HOWEVER to simply legalize him via amnesty would be rewarding illegal behavior.

Bonnie
04-13-2010, 02:36 PM
Well that is a possibility.

Is conservatism such a weak idea that immigrants would not embrace the values and beliefs of conservatism? Or are we to assume immigrants will only embrace and be welcomed by big government types?


Hmm you'd have to ask big government types why they are so sure immigrants would be easy prey? Could be illegals track record shows them such.

I personally would love to believe if illegals came here legally playing by the rules they would have an incentive to embrace conservatism.

PostmodernProphet
04-13-2010, 04:39 PM
At the very least he would have to pay the same taxes as Joe, HOWEVER to simply legalize him via amnesty would be rewarding illegal behavior.

you mean as opposed to what's described in the OP?.....no, we wouldn't want to reward him, would we.....

SassyLady
04-14-2010, 01:17 AM
What if Jose illegal was made legal?

Then Jose will be pissed off at Marko (new illegal) because he is now having to pay for everything and Marko is reaping the benefits of being an illegal working in America.

This is why the people who worked hard to get here legally are more vehement towards amnesty than American born citizens.

Amnesty does not solve the illegal immigration problem....in fact, it will cause a broader unemploymet base. Employers will lay off Joe, put Jose in Joe's job, and then hire another illegal to put in Jose's job.

sgtdmski
04-14-2010, 03:14 AM
What if Jose illegal was made legal?

Then he would be screwed just like Joe Legal. Perhaps we should make them legal, only after charging them outrageous sums of money for back taxes for the years they spent in the country illegally and of course a small prison sentence for being a criminal in the first place!

dmk

sgtdmski
04-14-2010, 03:27 AM
Well that is a possibility.

Is conservatism such a weak idea that immigrants would not embrace the values and beliefs of conservatism? Or are we to assume immigrants will only embrace and be welcomed by big government types?

True immigrants have no problem embracing conservatism, they understand it intimately. They struggled, followed the law and worked hard to come to this country. However, illegal immigrants have no need for conservatism. Why would the embrace an ideal that values hard work and individualism. Thanks to liberals in this country they have been given social services, food stamps, rent subsidies and medical care, why would they ever vote against someone who is giving them everything for nothing????

That is the problem with liberalism, while its many elite proponents bask in its humanity, it keeps a second class of citizens forever stuck and dependent upon the government.

Isn't it amazing, Southern Democrats who kept minorities as slave on plantations in the 18th and 19th centuries, are today Northern and Western Democrats who forever keep them dependent on the government not truly slaves, but not much better,

dmk