PDA

View Full Version : Holder Admits to Not Reading Arizona's Immigration Law Despite Criticizing It



red states rule
05-13-2010, 08:04 PM
How typical of the left. Libs have worked overtime smearing the folks of Arizona - yet they have NOT even taken time to read the ten page bill





Despite repeatedly voicing concerns about Arizona's new immigration enforcement law in recent weeks and threatening to challenge it, Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday he has not yet read the law -- which is only 10 pages long.

"I have not had a chance to -- I've glanced at it," Holder said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing when asked had he read the state law cracking down on illegal immigrants.

Holder told reporters last month that he fears the new law is subject to abuse and that the Justice Department and the Homeland Security Department are in the midst of conducting a review.

The Arizona law requires local and state law enforcement to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the country illegally, and makes it a state crime to be in the United States illegally.

The law has sparked protests across the country, including a City Council-approved boycott of Arizona businesses by Los Angeles.But proponents deny that the law encourages racial profilng, with some saying the local controversy is a symptom of a broken federal immigration system.

Holder said last month that a number of options are under consideration, including the possibility of a court challenge.

On Thursday, Holder said he plans to read the law before reaching a decision on whether he thinks it's constitutional.

When asked by Rep.Ted Poe, R-Texas, how he could have constitutional concerns about a law he has not read, Holder said: "Well, what I've said is that I've not made up my mind. I've only made the comments that I've made on the basis of things that I've been able to glean by reading newspaper accounts, obviously, television, talking to people who are on the review panel...looking at the law."

On Sunday, Holder said he does not think Arizona's law is racially motivated but voiced concern that its enforcement could lead to racial profiling.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/13/holder-admits-reading-arizonas-immigration-law-despite-slamming/

PostmodernProphet
05-13-2010, 09:22 PM
I've only made the comments that I've made on the basis of things that I've been able to glean by reading newspaper accounts, obviously, television, talking to people who are on the review panel...looking at the law."


once upon a time newspapers and television reported what government officials thought about the law.....now apparently, government officials report on what newspapers and television think about the law...

82Marine89
05-14-2010, 12:02 AM
once upon a time newspapers and television reported what government officials thought about the law.....now apparently, government officials report on what newspapers and television think about the law...

...and....you...blindly....follow....them....

SassyLady
05-14-2010, 12:16 AM
How typical of the left. Libs have worked overtime smearing the folks of Arizona - yet they have NOT even taken time to read the ten page bill

Remember when the Palin interview with Katie Couric caused such an uproar because Palin didn't quote the right "reading" material so people could understand where she derived her politics?

Maybe Holder should call up Katie and ask her what would be the appropriate reading material to base his political opinions on.

PostmodernProphet
05-14-2010, 06:49 AM
...and....you...blindly....follow....them....

I do?......any particular reason for the personal attack?.....or are you just feeling fucked up and feisty.......

82Marine89
05-14-2010, 07:22 AM
I do?......any particular reason for the personal attack?.....or are you just feeling fucked up and feisty.......

That's a personal attack? Calling someone a racist is a personal attack. Referring to you as a lemming is an observation.

PostmodernProphet
05-14-2010, 10:38 AM
That's a personal attack? Calling someone a racist is a personal attack. Referring to you as a lemming is an observation.

lol.....and referring to you as someone who obviously has never read my posts would be an observation as well.....

hjmick
05-14-2010, 11:08 AM
Does this surprise anyone? Does anyone think Obama has read the Arizona law? he's been just as critical as Holder, yet I doubt he's done his reading...

Monkeybone
05-14-2010, 11:43 AM
why do we have to read anything? The news tells us what is going on with 100% accuracy.


or should Arizone not have released and pulled a Pelosi with "you'll find out whats in it when it passes"

red states rule
05-14-2010, 06:56 PM
Does this surprise anyone? Does anyone think Obama has read the Arizona law? he's been just as critical as Holder, yet I doubt he's done his reading...

Not surprised at all. Holder has not read the US Constitution

Neither has Obama

DragonStryk72
05-14-2010, 07:20 PM
why do we have to read anything? The news tells us what is going on with 100% accuracy.


or should Arizone not have released and pulled a Pelosi with "you'll find out whats in it when it passes"

News can of course be biased, for or against, and it is the responsibility of those in office to read those laws, especially when they decide to go on national tv about them, and give opinion on them.

red states rule
05-14-2010, 07:23 PM
News can of course be biased, for or against, and it is the responsibility of those in office to read those laws, especially when they decide to go on national tv about them, and give opinion on them.

Dems (and RINO's) support booting illegals and the enforcement of immigrations laws? Are you nuts?

Dems will not give up the votes from the illegals and RINO's think by supporting the rights of illegals they will be loved by the left and liberal media

actsnoblemartin
05-14-2010, 08:15 PM
oh snap! :coffee:


lol.....and referring to you as someone who obviously has never read my posts would be an observation as well.....

Mr. P
05-14-2010, 10:35 PM
When asked by Rep.Ted Poe, R-Texas, how he could have constitutional concerns about a law he has not read, Holder said: "Well, what I've said is that I've not made up my mind. I've only made the comments that I've made on the basis of things that I've been able to glean by reading newspaper accounts, obviously, television, talking to people who are on the review panel...looking at the law."

If there was ever a clearer answer to the question of who's running the country. This says it all, the media is. The left wing media.

If this is how the administration is going to govern it would be great to have the media full of Joe "just the facts ma'am" Friday, instead of liberal opinion.

82Marine89
05-14-2010, 10:52 PM
How typical of the left. Libs have worked overtime smearing the folks of Arizona - yet they have NOT even taken time to read the ten page bill

He doesn't need to read the Bill. He can read the Federal Law he is supposed to uphold. The Arizona law is almost a direct quote of the Federal Immigration law. The law that is not being enforced.