PDA

View Full Version : global warming strikes again



namvet
01-20-2011, 11:10 AM
http://oi55.tinypic.com/jsodpc.jpg


http://oi53.tinypic.com/29wptop.jpg

http://oi55.tinypic.com/2463od0.jpg

my man Bryan to the rescue - 10-12"

CSM
01-20-2011, 11:14 AM
Yep, we have a lot of those "Al Gore Carbon Credits" laying around too.

namvet
01-20-2011, 11:17 AM
this started yesterday around 2 pm and just stopped this morning. and more on the way sunday

CSM
01-20-2011, 11:18 AM
They are predicting snow here in NH for tonite and tomorrow. Same storm you folks just got I guess.

namvet
01-20-2011, 11:23 AM
They are predicting snow here in NH for tonite and tomorrow. Same storm you folks just got I guess.

well hope it miss's you. the east coast has had enough !!!

CSM
01-20-2011, 11:30 AM
I dunno if the East Coast has had enough but this old CSM has had more than enough! makes me cseriously contemplate moving south.

namvet
01-20-2011, 11:42 AM
I dunno if the East Coast has had enough but this old CSM has had more than enough! makes me cseriously contemplate moving south.

make sure its waaay south

LA

http://www.corpuschristidaily.com/ccpic/images/photos/PalmTrees%20snow.jpg

CSM
01-20-2011, 11:45 AM
Dang! Global warming everywhere.

logroller
01-20-2011, 12:36 PM
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthWhite%2520EarthCanadianGlaciersMeltingFa st0001.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthScience.html&usg=__swTjohQAjlCwi6vz3b_z6BdoxYg=&h=312&w=450&sz=47&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=ucoo_YqqrCm2tM:&tbnh=142&tbnw=199&ei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dglobal%2Bwarming%2Beffects%2Bon%2Bgla ciers%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox%26biw%3D1497%26bih%3D737%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=338&vpy=385&dur=2312&hovh=187&hovw=270&tx=104&ty=132&oei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=29&ved=1t:429,r:15,s:0

As much as I hate to jump into this; I'm compelled to do so. Global warming doesn't mean the snowfall stops. Some areas may indeed get more, others less; but the accumulated snow areas (poles, glaciers etc) has been lessened, due to a global warming trend. Rather or not human activity has influenced this remains contested by some; but of higher relevance is that our consumption of resources is unsustainable, or greater than what the global systems can renew, and if the warming trend(rather or not we caused it) will make resource renewal even slower. Carbon credits will do only one thing, offset our consumption of resources to more sustainable renewal rates- this in turn will retard industrial growth, then commercial growth, job reduction in traditional sectors etc. I suppose the issue, at its core, is rather we should care at all. I mean societies have collapsed throughout history, while others flourished; there are many commonalities between both, but the overwhelming difference between them was their response to their environment, be they natural or a product of man.

My point is, if one wants production and another wants investment; doesn't the greater confidence prevail? Which are we more confident in, our ability to produce or our ability to invest?

CSM
01-20-2011, 12:44 PM
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthWhite%2520EarthCanadianGlaciersMeltingFa st0001.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthScience.html&usg=__swTjohQAjlCwi6vz3b_z6BdoxYg=&h=312&w=450&sz=47&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=ucoo_YqqrCm2tM:&tbnh=142&tbnw=199&ei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dglobal%2Bwarming%2Beffects%2Bon%2Bgla ciers%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox%26biw%3D1497%26bih%3D737%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=338&vpy=385&dur=2312&hovh=187&hovw=270&tx=104&ty=132&oei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=29&ved=1t:429,r:15,s:0

As much as I hate to jump into this; I'm compelled to do so. Global warming doesn't mean the snowfall stops. Some areas may indeed get more, others less; but the accumulated snow areas (poles, glaciers etc) has been lessened, due to a global warming trend. Rather or not human activity has influenced this remains contested by some; but of higher relevance is that our consumption of resources is unsustainable, or greater than what the global systems can renew, and if the warming trend(rather or not we caused it) will make resource renewal even slower. Carbon credits will do only one thing, offset our consumption of resources to more sustainable renewal rates- this in turn will retard industrial growth, then commercial growth, job reduction in traditional sectors etc. I suppose the issue, at its core, is rather we should care at all. I mean societies have collapsed throughout history, while others flourished; there are many commonalities between both, but the overwhelming difference between them was their response to their environment, be they natural or a product of man.

My point is, if one wants production and another wants investment; doesn't the greater confidence prevail? Which are we more confident in, our ability to produce or our ability to invest?

No sense of humor eh? Too bad.

KarlMarx
01-20-2011, 01:36 PM
We got 4-6 inches of global warming on Tuesday and are getting 4 more inches of global warming tomorrow

Syracuse has a record amount of global warming this year, as are other parts of the country.

The price of oranges, tomatoes, and other produce is sky high thanks to sudden bouts of global warming that killed off a large number of crops.

We are also helping the environment by diverting 40% of the nation's corn crop into making ethanol for cars. This is supposed to be saving us money.. the last time I filled up, I paid $3.29 a gallon (I live in NY).

I'd like to suggest that Al Gore join a trappist monestary

namvet
01-20-2011, 01:48 PM
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthWhite%2520EarthCanadianGlaciersMeltingFa st0001.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.whiteearth.org/WhiteEarthScience.html&usg=__swTjohQAjlCwi6vz3b_z6BdoxYg=&h=312&w=450&sz=47&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=ucoo_YqqrCm2tM:&tbnh=142&tbnw=199&ei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dglobal%2Bwarming%2Beffects%2Bon%2Bgla ciers%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox%26biw%3D1497%26bih%3D737%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=338&vpy=385&dur=2312&hovh=187&hovw=270&tx=104&ty=132&oei=CGk4TavqHILCsAPywuGOAw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=29&ved=1t:429,r:15,s:0

As much as I hate to jump into this; I'm compelled to do so. Global warming doesn't mean the snowfall stops. Some areas may indeed get more, others less; but the accumulated snow areas (poles, glaciers etc) has been lessened, due to a global warming trend. Rather or not human activity has influenced this remains contested by some; but of higher relevance is that our consumption of resources is unsustainable, or greater than what the global systems can renew, and if the warming trend(rather or not we caused it) will make resource renewal even slower. Carbon credits will do only one thing, offset our consumption of resources to more sustainable renewal rates- this in turn will retard industrial growth, then commercial growth, job reduction in traditional sectors etc. I suppose the issue, at its core, is rather we should care at all. I mean societies have collapsed throughout history, while others flourished; there are many commonalities between both, but the overwhelming difference between them was their response to their environment, be they natural or a product of man.

My point is, if one wants production and another wants investment; doesn't the greater confidence prevail? Which are we more confident in, our ability to produce or our ability to invest?

Scientist Predicts Ice Age Within 10 Years. others predict in 50 years or less


As evidence builds of the earth entering a dramatic cooling trend, another scientist has gone public with his conviction that we are about to enter a new ice age, rendering warnings about global warming fraudulent and irrelevant.



source (http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientist-predicts-ice-age-within-10-years.html)

so which is it plenty of ice cubes for martini's or a burned hot dog on a bun???

Thunderknuckles
01-20-2011, 02:59 PM
This is why they changed terms from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change".
That way can claim the sky is falling no matter which way the temperature goes.