PDA

View Full Version : Voting with Their Feet



red states rule
03-29-2011, 03:10 AM
More proof when you raise taxes on the producers you end driving them out of the state




The latest published data from the 2010 census show how people are moving from place to place within the United States. In general, people are voting with their feet against places where the liberal, welfare-state policies favored by the intelligentsia are most deeply entrenched.

When you break it down by race and ethnicity, it is all too painfully clear what is happening. Both whites and blacks are leaving California, the poster state for the liberal, welfare-state and nanny-state philosophy.

Whites are also fleeing the big northeastern liberal, welfare states like Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, as well as the same kinds of states in the midwest, such as Michigan, Ohio and Illinois.

Although California has long been a prime destination of Asian immigrants and the homes of their descendants, the 2010 census shows a striking increase in the Asian American population of Nevada, more so than any other state. Nevada is adjacent to California but has no income tax nor the hostile climate for business that California maintains.

The movement of the black population-- especially educated young blacks-- is the most striking of all.

In the past, the massive movements of millions of blacks out of the South in the early 20th century was one of the epic migrations of a people-- comparable in size with the millions of the Irish who fled the famine in Ireland in the 1840s or the millions of Jews who fled persecution in Eastern Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

In more recent decades, blacks have been moving back to the South, however. While the overall black population of the northeastern and midwestern states has not declined in the past ten years, except in Michigan and Illinois, the net increase of the black population nationwide has increasingly been in the South. About half of the national growth of the black population took place in the South in the 1970s, two-thirds in the 1990s and three-quarters in the past 10 years.

While the mass migrations of blacks out of the South in the early 20th century was to places where there were already established black communities, such as New York, Chicago and Philadelphia, much of the current movement of blacks is away from existing concentrations of black populations.

http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2011/03/29/voting_with_their_feet

Little-Acorn
03-29-2011, 11:13 AM
Democracy in action, American style.

The Framers intended from the first, that while the Fed Govt was to be small and limited, the states were free to do practically anything they wanted... and take the consequences. If a state put programs into place that its people didn't want, it was (a) easier to change the state govt than the Fed govt, and (b) easier to move out of one state into another, than out of the country.

People are now doing both: Changing the state govts (sometimes to the screams of panicky liberals in states like Wisconsin and Indiana), and pulling up stakes and leaving uber-liberal places like California, Massachusetts etc.

I see nothing wrong with any of this. It's called "freedom". And it's how the system is supposed to operate.

Of course, if the govts of CA, MA and the other socialist enclaves don't like what's happening to their population statistics (for liberals, read "tax base"), they are just as free to change THEIR ways, and try to attract their populations back. But they'd better start soon. People don't really like to move out of state... but once they've done it, they certainly don't like to do it twice.