Hoffa Says of Tea Party "Let's Take these SOBs Out!"

[red states rule]

Nothing like union thugs telling us what they really think of those who have a different opinion on the role and size of governemnt.

Anyone want to bet that Obama wil NOT take this on and tell Hoffa he was out of line?







Just reported on Fox News...at a Detroit rally for Obama to preview his joke of a jobs bill, Jimmy Hoffa Jr. warming up the crowd said of the GOP and the Tea Party "Let's take these sons of b-tches out!" This is a clear incitement to violence which Obama must condemn at once. If he does not, then he is a rank hypocrite accusing conservatives of incivility and incitment as part of his attempt to politicize the Gabby Giffords shooting. This is a MUCH MORE CLEAR CALL FOR VIOLENCE than anything they can pin on anyone in the Tea Party, including Sarah Palin who they laughably accused of incitement merely for using the term "targetting of districts," a political operatives term of art used for decades in talking about Congressional campaigns.

If anyone in the Tea Party is harmed, the responsibility lies DIRECTLY on the hands of this scumbag Hoffa. We know Obama won't utter a peep about this latest outrageous remark against patriotic, hard working Americans by one of his surrogates, but we need to spread the word of the continuing attempts by Democrats to attack and silence dissent against this Stalinist administration.
There's one thing we can do to respond to this immediately, and that's to stop using UPS. UPS is a teamster union which Hoffa heads. Switch to Fed Ex which is non-union.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2773894/posts

[KartRacerBoy]

Pretty much like Mitch McConnell saying the Republicans #1 goal is get Obama out of office in 2012 and make him a one term president. Oh the outrage.

[red states rule]

Pretty much like Mitch McConnell saying the Republicans #1 goal is get Obama out of office in 2012 and make him a one term president. Oh the outrage.

and what the hell does that have to do with a union thug wanting to take people out and kill them? Please don't pretend not to get the meaning of what this union thug ment Kart - even though you will

The only thing libs like you are good act is making excuses for the "civility" that is constantly coming form your fellow libs

[red states rule]

here is the union thugs civility in his own words. It is around the 2 min mark


<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rjSZSEOPCC4" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[red states rule]

Seems to me the left is scared that the Tea Party is a threat to their power and programs

and it is not shocking that union thugs are willing to KILL to get what they want

So much for that call for civility form the left, and the liberal media.

[ConHog]

RSR I like you brah, but come on. He wasn't calling for the killing of anyone.


Dial the rhetoric back a notch eh?

[KartRacerBoy]

It's pretty much like the "2nd Amendment solution" uttered by some crazy Arizona gov, senator, or representative months ago. Exceptionally stupid political rhetoric that I wish we'd get past but we apparently can't. Political dialoge really hasn't advanced in the past 200+ yrs. Federalists called for tar and feathering folks who openly opposed the fed constitution 200+ yrs ago.

[hjmick]

Pretty much like Mitch McConnell saying the Republicans #1 goal is get Obama out of office in 2012 and make him a one term president. Oh the outrage.


No, it's nothing like that.

[ConHog]

No, it's nothing like that.

You lookin to be labeled as a racist?

[hjmick]

You lookin to be labeled as a racist?


Makes me no nevermind. Call me whatever, it doesn't make it so. I know who I am and I know what's in my heart. To hell with anything else.

[ConHog]

Makes me no nevermind. Call me whatever, it doesn't make it so. I know who I am and I know what's in my heart. To hell with anything else.

I was bein sarcastic brah

[hjmick]

Yeah, I know. My response was more of a "Blow me" for anyone who might play the racism card than it was an actual response to your post...

[ConHog]

Yeah, I know. My response was more of a "Blow me" for anyone who might play the racism card than it was an actual response to your post...

No worries.

[red states rule]

RSR I like you brah, but come on. He wasn't calling for the killing of anyone.


Dial the rhetoric back a notch eh?

Con lets take a look at what he said. He said the unions are at war with the Tea Party. The unions have assualted people and destroyed private property to send their message and show their muscles in recent months

To me he was not talking about having a discussion about the differences in policy, but rather solving a "problem" the usual way the union thugs do

[red states rule]

It's pretty much like the "2nd Amendment solution" uttered by some crazy Arizona gov, senator, or representative months ago. Exceptionally stupid political rhetoric that I wish we'd get past but we apparently can't. Political dialoge really hasn't advanced in the past 200+ yrs. Federalists called for tar and feathering folks who openly opposed the fed constitution 200+ yrs ago.

Not surprising the Dems, Obama, and the liberal media are giving Hoffa's comment a collective yawn.

But they stil have their double standards considering they tried to blame Sarah Palin and the Tea Party for the AZ shootings and demanded the right tone down the political rhetoric

Like their call for civility, toning down the political rhetoric is only a one way street with them

[red states rule]

Hoffa stands by his comments and the liberal media are in spin mode





Teamsters union president James Hoffa would say it all again if he could, he told TPM Monday.

Hoffa riled up Fox News and the right wing (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/09/05/hoffa-at-obama-rally-we-need-to-take-these-tea-party-sons-of-bitches-out/) Monday with a Labor Day speech in Detroit in which he called Republican members of Congress "sons of bitches (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/hoffa-lets-take-these-sons-of-bitches-out.php)" and said union workers are ready to "go to war" with the tea party next year and "take out" Republicans at the ballot box.

Hoffa said he'd say the exact same words all over again.

"I would because I believe it," he said. "They've declared war on us. We didn't declare war on them, they declared war on us. We're fighting back. The question is, who started the war?"

The speech came shortly before President Obama took the stage in Detroit -- and Hoffa's remarks certainly overshadowed Obama's on Fox. But the Teamsters chief said he was just matching fired-up conservative rhetoric when it comes to organized labor and Obama with some fired-up rhetoric of his own.

Presidential hopeful Herman Cain decried the speech as "name-calling" in an interview on Fox News shortly after Hoffa's remarks -- which were repeatedly looped on the network -- but the union leader dismissed criticisms like that one as total hypocrisy.

"How is that different than Mitch McConnell saying he wants to take out Barack Obama?" Hoffa said.

Progressive Fox News watchdog Media Matters For America charged that the clip (http://mediamatters.org/blog/201109050003) had been deceptively edited in Fox's re-airing of it.


http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/teamsters-president-no-regrets-after-firey-speech-draws-right-wing-criticism.php?ref=fpblg

[KarlMarx]

I'm surprised no one mentioned just how upset the Left was last January after Representative Gifford was shot. The Left accused the Right of inciting violence when they used the term "in our crosshairs" in political ads, even saying that the Right meant it literally. Here is a case of a double standard in the media. No condemnation of the term "take the SOBs out" is being heard.

[red states rule]

I'm surprised no one mentioned just how upset the Left was last January after Representative Gifford was shot. The Left accused the Right of inciting violence when they used the term "in our crosshairs" in political ads, even saying that the Right meant it literally. Here is a case of a double standard in the media. No condemnation of the term "take the SOBs out" is being heard.

You mean this ad?

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/235504/SARAH-PALIN-TARGET-LIST.jpg


Of course Dems had their own "target" ad


http://www.wnd.com/images/MADSADBIRTHERSreduced.jpg

[red states rule]

The liberal media either ignores Hoffa's comment (the NY Times) or they are loving it

Libs and Obama should be embarrassed by this rant by Hoffa. But to be embarrassed by it they would have to have a conscience

<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/70fDzfu3xxA" frameBorder=0 width=560 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[red states rule]

The hypocrisy of the left clearly defined

<IFRAME title="MRC TV video player" height=360 src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/105368" frameBorder=0 width=640 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[J.T]

:rolleyes:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU9GXil9Vm8

"To the teams that desire making it this far next year: Gear up! In the battle, set your sights on next season's targets! From the shot across the bow -- the first second's tip-off -- your leaders will be in the enemy's crosshairs, so you must execute strong defensive tactics," Palin wrote. "Get in their faces and argue with them. (Sound familiar?!) Every possession is a battle; you'll only win the war if you've picked your battles wisely. No matter how tough it gets, never retreat, instead RELOAD!"

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001323-503544.html

[Thunderknuckles]

I heard about this on talk radio on way home from work yesterday. From what I understand, the full context of the speech was in regards to voting the sons of bitches out, not by some act of violence. I haven't seen the full speech myself yet so I can't verify this but though I'd toss it out there.

[Gaffer]

I heard about this on talk radio on way home from work yesterday. From what I understand, the full context of the speech was in regards to voting the sons of bitches out, not by some act of violence. I haven't seen the full speech myself yet so I can't verify this but though I'd toss it out there. When you hear the full context you know it's not about voting.

[J.T]

When you hear the full context you know it's not about voting.

Is that why you tell people to start at 2:00? Because at 1:58 he says 'Everyone here's got to vote' :rolleyes:

Why do you lie?

[Nukeman]

:rolleyes:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU9GXil9Vm8

"To the teams that desire making it this far next year: Gear up! In the battle, set your sights on next season's targets! From the shot across the bow -- the first second's tip-off -- your leaders will be in the enemy's crosshairs, so you must execute strong defensive tactics," Palin wrote. "Get in their faces and argue with them. (Sound familiar?!) Every possession is a battle; you'll only win the war if you've picked your battles wisely. No matter how tough it gets, never retreat, instead RELOAD!"


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001323-503544.htmlIm not sure what your attemting to say here. Are you saying the Right does this type of rhetoric as well?? If so NO ONE here has siad otherwise, what has been said is the HYPOCRISY of the media in ignoring Hoffa's speach and the WH not condemning it, but doing so in the case of Conservatives..

Tell me JT why the double standard?? Why can one side say this yet the other has to "watch what they say"??????

[fj1200]

Tell me JT why the double standard??

He can't be honest with himself and is unable to reconcile his inner conflict.

[Gaffer]

Is that why you tell people to start at 2:00? Because at 1:58 he says 'Everyone here's got to vote' :rolleyes:

Why do you lie?

Did you get up on the liberal side of the bed this morning?

[J.T]

Did you get up on the liberal side of the bed this morning?

As I've said a million times: fuck John Locke. That idiot was debunked a long time ago.

[beanerboy]

taking them out of office is no worse than putting a bullseye over their district on a map.

[avatar4321]

Pretty much like Mitch McConnell saying the Republicans #1 goal is get Obama out of office in 2012 and make him a one term president. Oh the outrage.

Since when is wanting to vote someone out of office at all compatible with advocating violence?

[red states rule]

When you hear the full context you know it's not about voting.

Here is another example of union thugs and how they deal with people that disagree with them. This time it is a disabled balck guy at a Obamcare rally who opposed Obamacare

<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Wr_4ZWEFOjQ" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[red states rule]

Since when is wanting to vote someone out of office at all compatible with advocating violence?

It's not. It was one one of the excuses offered by the liberal talking heads

[red states rule]

taking them out of office is no worse than putting a bullseye over their district on a map.


http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/payn110908_cmyk20110907090712.jpg

[red states rule]

The WH is offering the excuse Obama did not hear Hoffa's remarks

The same way we were told Obama did not hear the comments of Rev Wright for 20 years

<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HqVurbsgwTY" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>