PDA

View Full Version : Were Twin Towers felled by chemical blasts?



-Cp
09-22-2011, 01:23 AM
Smoke billows up after the first of the two towers of the World Trade Center collapses in 2001 in New York City. A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.
A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.

Read the rest at:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html (http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html)

LuvRPgrl
09-23-2011, 01:36 PM
Smoke billows up after the first of the two towers of the World Trade Center collapses in 2001 in New York City. A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.
A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.

Read the rest at:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html (http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html)

I dont even bother with details on the attack, because the sheer number of people involved it is IMPOSSIBLE for the conspiracy secret to remain a secret. Period, end of issue.

revelarts
10-28-2011, 03:08 PM
food for thought...

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M4vI1DVjQ0M?version=3&feature=player_detailpage"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M4vI1DVjQ0M?version=3&feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>

jimnyc
10-28-2011, 03:26 PM
Great, another idiot speaking for Richard Gage, with all kinds of claims about lack of evidence, then tosses in his own IDEA of evidence, without giving any evidence to support his ludicrous claims.

But good to see you can do more condemning of our government and first responders and others, Rev, and nothing about the execution of over 3,000 citizens. Sad, sad for someone who apparently sits around all day watching conspiracy videos and falling for the majority of them.

ConHog
10-28-2011, 03:32 PM
Smoke billows up after the first of the two towers of the World Trade Center collapses in 2001 in New York City. A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.
A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.

Read the rest at:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html (http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html)

Yes in fact a chemical did cause the collapse of the twin towers. That chemical is commonly referred to as jet fuel.

DUH!

jimnyc
10-28-2011, 03:33 PM
Yes in fact a chemical did cause the collapse of the twin towers. That chemical is commonly referred to as jet fuel.

DUH!

LOL :lol:

ConHog
10-28-2011, 03:39 PM
LOL :lol:

Seemed rather obvious to me when a plane crashed into the building that the jet fuel MIGHT be the cause of the fire.

Little-Acorn
10-28-2011, 03:47 PM
(shakes head)

How stupid do you have to be, to believe this conspiracy crap?

ConHog
10-28-2011, 03:50 PM
(shakes head)

How stupid do you have to be, to believe this conspiracy crap?



Unfortunately , the average American IS that stupid. Look who got elected as POTUS for proof of that statement.

Abbey
10-28-2011, 04:54 PM
Without terrorists flying planes into these buildings, there is no chance for meltdown that day, chemical or otherwise. So, other than using provable conclusions from data to build more terrorist-proof buildings in the future, a big fat "who cares" comes from me on the chemical issue.

Little-Acorn
10-28-2011, 05:08 PM
Unfortunately , the average American IS that stupid. Look who got elected as POTUS for proof of that statement.

I think we will find that only a few believe this sort of tripe... just a few of the more obsessive blinders-on kooks.

A non-issue.

jimnyc
10-28-2011, 05:16 PM
I think we will find that only a few believe this sort of tripe... just a few of the more obsessive blinders-on kooks.

A non-issue.

But if you don't believe them, and agree with any explanation from the government or tons of agencies involved in the cleanup/reports - you will be told that you are a good drone for the government. LOL

Seriously though - after 10 years - not ONE piece of solid evidence to backup an inside job, or any "job" other than what many, many reports tell us. I'm sure the government and others aren't perfect, and with a strike this massive they probably got a few things wrong, but it HARDLY means a coverup. One would think that such a massive undertaking would have shown at least one person with information or one piece of verifiable evidence to support the other claims. I guess it's easier to cry "THERMITE"!!!! which of course none was proven to be found, which of course also wouldn't explain the airliners and all of its passengers. Oh wait, there weren't any, it was missiles made to look like planes and the passengers were killed elsewhere!

It's always good old fashioned fun to read this section of the site! :coffee: