PDA

View Full Version : Voter Disapproval of Obama Hardens



red states rule
10-16-2011, 04:00 AM
The lower his poll numbers go, the further left Obama moves. Should Obama continue to suck up to far left kooks, (as the economy continues to sour) election night 2012 will look like election night 1980, or 1984

Yet the further left Obama goes, the lower his poll numbers sink. It's like Obama's economic policies. If a couple trillion did not solve the prblem, maybe an few hundred billion more will do the job





Like an early-autumn frost, a blast of pessimism about the country’s direction has snapped a slow but steady warming trend toward President Obama in the latest Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor survey.

Just 44 percent of those surveyed said they approved of Obama’s performance as president—his lowest rating in the 10 Heartland Monitor polls conducted since April 2009. Likewise, the share of adults disapproving of his performance also reached a high at 50 percent. Those results reversed modest but consistent gains for Obama since his previous low point in the survey in August 2010. In the most recent survey, conducted last May in the aftermath of the Osama bin Laden raid, Obama’s approval rating had edged up to 51 percent, with only 41 percent disapproving.

Equally ominous for the president: 70 percent of those polled in the new survey said that the country was on the wrong track. That’s a sharp increase just since the most recent Heartland Monitor in May—and by far the highest level of dissatisfaction over the country’s direction recorded in any of the 10 polls. (The previous high was 62 percent in August 2010, just before the GOP landslide in the midterm elections that year.) Only one-fifth believed the country was moving in the right direction.

Most political scientists and pollsters agree that, especially in presidential races involving an incumbent, those bottom-line measures—the approval rating and the right-track/wrong-track assessment—are the most powerful predictors of the vote. Obama still has time to regain lost ground, but on both fronts, his position today more resembles the profile of incumbents who were defeated than those who won reelection.

Increasing anxiety about the future appears to be hurting Obama more than growing pain in the present. The share of adults who said they have trouble making ends meet—22 percent—was unchanged from previous polls in 2009 and 2010. But in the new poll, fully 46 percent said they expected the economy to deteriorate over the next year, a big jump from the 32 percent who took that gloomy view last May. Fifty percent still expected the economy to improve, but that was a notable drop from the 61 percent last May who saw sun peeking through the clouds.


http://nationaljournal.com/magazine/obama-s-performance-rating-slips-again-20111014

Gunny
10-16-2011, 06:26 AM
The lower his poll numbers go, the further left Obama moves. Should Obama continue to suck up to far left kooks, (as the economy continues to sour) election night 2012 will look like election night 1980, or 1984

Yet the further left Obama goes, the lower his poll numbers sink. It's like Obama's economic policies. If a couple trillion did not solve the prblem, maybe an few hundred billion more will do the job

Definitely reminds me of the late 70's. Carter couldn't even get support from his own party in Congress. Purely from a "guess-timate" position, the Dems should cut their losses and run Hillary. She'd be tough to beat.

The difference I see from now vs then is the GOP doesn't really have anyone that stands out like they had in 80. Not because that stand out person doesn't exist, but because the media won't allow that person to exist. Everyone's worried about right this, left that but no one wants to address the fact that BOTH candidates last election were chosen by the media.

red states rule
10-17-2011, 02:49 AM
Definitely reminds me of the late 70's. Carter couldn't even get support from his own party in Congress. Purely from a "guess-timate" position, the Dems should cut their losses and run Hillary. She'd be tough to beat.

The difference I see from now vs then is the GOP doesn't really have anyone that stands out like they had in 80. Not because that stand out person doesn't exist, but because the media won't allow that person to exist. Everyone's worried about right this, left that but no one wants to address the fact that BOTH candidates last election were chosen by the media.

If the right puts up a good candidate, he/she can go around the liberal media like Reagan did. Sure the liberal media will try to carry Obama across the finish line like they did Carter, but the folks vote with their pocket books Gunny

Unemployemnt will stil be high on Election Day and the economy will decide if Obama wins or loses