Coulter wants attacks on Obama children

[gabosaurus]

Ann Coulter must be suffering from a lack of attention. She recently stated that conservative Republicans should start attacking Obama's two daughters.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/22/coulter-maybe-time-to-go-after-the-obama-children/

Coulter also stated that Dems have always observed a double standard with this issue and have never been rebuffed. A convenient memory loss, to be sure.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=120280&page=1

[Gator Monroe]

I'm thinkin attacking the Wookie would be more palatable ...:slap:

[Thunderknuckles]

A little look at reality Gabby:

The press looked for any excuse to put Bush's daughter's in the papers. With Jenna they got their wish.
Before Bush it was McCain's daughter Meghan and Palin's daughter Bristol.
Before that it was Chelsea Clinton.
Before that it was Reagan's children and their political divide with their father.
Before that the media had some fucking respect.

Bottom line: Both conservative and liberal media are real douche bags when it comes to the children of Presidents or Presidential Candidates.
Coulter, the bitch that she is, asks why not go after Obama's children?
I think we all know the answer to that one.

[DragonStryk72]

Ann Coulter must be suffering from a lack of attention. She recently stated that conservative Republicans should start attacking Obama's two daughters.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/22/coulter-maybe-time-to-go-after-the-obama-children/

Coulter also stated that Dems have always observed a double standard with this issue and have never been rebuffed. A convenient memory loss, to be sure.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=120280&page=1

"So maybe it’s time to start imitating liberals in another way and go after the Obama children."

Okay, so clearly you must have not read the full sentence, gabs, because otherwise it looks as though you purposefully misquoted her to paint in a worse light.

So why do you feel that's it okay for Liberal to attack children, but not Conservatives?

[fj1200]

So why do you feel that's it okay for Liberal to attack children, but not Conservatives?

Kudos for actually reading the article and asking the correct question.

[jimnyc]

Kudos for actually reading the article and asking the correct question.

Gabs probably read the first sentence of each article, jumped to liberal conclusions, and posted them here.

[Gator Monroe]

Gabs probably read the first sentence of each article, jumped to liberal conclusions, and posted them here. Hey , I resemble that remark !:lol:

[Mr. P]

Another failed drive by, Gab. Geeezzz

[Little-Acorn]

When I saw the title of this thread, I knew that:

1.) It had to be a lie, and sure enough it was; and
2.) It had to be from little gabby, and sure enough it was; and
3.) She would once again run and hide after posting it, and sure enough she has.

This is getting way too easy. (yawn)

[LuvRPgrl]

Ann Coulter must be suffering from a lack of attention. She recently stated that conservative Republicans should start attacking Obama's two daughters.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/22/coulter-maybe-time-to-go-after-the-obama-children/

Coulter also stated that Dems have always observed a double standard with this issue and have never been rebuffed. A convenient memory loss, to be sure.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=120280&page=1

I think its obvious she was being sarcastic, the single most prominent adjective used to describe ann cou

she did say "MAYBE" which in fact means it isnt currently, and its only a thought about the future, at worst, and definately not a command.

[hjmick]

Gabs probably read the first sentence of each article, jumped to liberal conclusions, and posted them here.

Probably?

[SassyLady]

Ann Coulter must be suffering from a lack of attention. She recently stated that conservative Republicans should start attacking Obama's two daughters.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/22/coulter-maybe-time-to-go-after-the-obama-children/

Coulter also stated that Dems have always observed a double standard with this issue and have never been rebuffed. A convenient memory loss, to be sure.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=120280&page=1

What's the matter Gabs ... don't like turn about, fair play?

[gabosaurus]

Bottom line: Both conservative and liberal media are real douche bags when it comes to the children of Presidents or Presidential Candidates.
Coulter, the bitch that she is, asks why not go after Obama's children?
I think we all know the answer to that one.

I totally agree with this. Thanks for breaking it down.

[tailfins]

Two wrongs don't make a right. While I don't single racism out for attack, behavior done under racism can become condoned behavior towards everybody. Had Bull Connor not been stopped, the precedent had been set that it's OK to use fire hoses on the public. It would have only been a matter of time before he used fire hoses on white people as well. The left has breached the line of decency about attacking children. That's not a reason for anyone else to spread the poison.

[jimnyc]

I totally agree with this. Thanks for breaking it down.

Let me ask you a serious question, Gabs...

You see how multiple conservatives look at things from both sides, and will admonish both for doing dirty tricks, and state it's wrong to do to ANY presidents kid. Do the liberals you come across in this forum, or other forums, look at things the same? I belong to quite a few forums, and it seems the liberals quite rarely want to admonish those within their party. Or is this the only forum on the 'net where cons are reasonable?

[Dilloduck]

I think its obvious she was being sarcastic, the single most prominent adjective used to describe ann cou

she did say "MAYBE" which in fact means it isnt currently, and its only a thought about the future, at worst, and definately not a command.


The dangers of sarcasm--some intellectually dishonest person who is desperate for validation will pretend it was not sarcasm and argue the strawman.

[LuvRPgrl]

The dangers of sarcasm--some intellectually dishonest person who is desperate for validation will pretend it was not sarcasm and argue the strawman.

Thats especially true when the sarcasm isnt quite so obvious, and often, the persons tone ofvoice and body language dont translate into words. Then, those whose only agenda is to hurt the person, and not attack the issue, post the statement ;making sure to make it sound like it wasnt sarcasm

On the other hand, when something is this sarcastic, if a person takes it serious, then they are waving a red flag identiying themnselves as boorish, ignorant, stupid, mean, unsophisticated and/or immature.