PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul has missed 92 percent of House votes.



gabosaurus
04-05-2012, 03:11 PM
Nothing like not doing the job that you were elected to do.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/220121-ron-paul-has-missed-92-percent-of-votes-in-2012

jimnyc
04-05-2012, 03:20 PM
He's not running for re-election, so he has very little to lose by ignoring the votes and using his time for the presidential election. He states, according to that article, that if elected CIC he would only take a salary of about $39k, or the median salary in the US.

He's making $174,000 now. He should be cutting that if he's only doing 10% of what he was elected to do as a congressmen, and the same goes for other candidates seeking other offices.

Little-Acorn
04-05-2012, 04:04 PM
Who does he think he is? David Bonior?

Trigg
04-05-2012, 04:25 PM
I don't like Paul, but I'm honor bound to point out a flaw in gabby's thread.

Bambam voted "present" 129 times while in the Illinois Senate. Hardly an outstanding record.

Bambam has done one thing in his 3 years as president and that is about to be thrown out as unconsitutional.

I have to wonder what he is going to run on, because it certainly isn't going to be his record.

Trigg
04-05-2012, 04:37 PM
Nothing like not doing the job that you were elected to do.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/220121-ron-paul-has-missed-92-percent-of-votes-in-2012

from the link YOU posted



It is not uncommon for Republican and Democratic members running for the White House to miss congressional votes. For example, then-Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) were rarely seen on Capitol Hill during their 2008 presidential primary clash.

Mr. P
04-05-2012, 05:30 PM
I wish ALL of em would miss 92% of the votes. I think we'd have less of a mess than we have now and for sure less government intrusion.

logroller
04-06-2012, 07:58 AM
If Ron Paul missed 92% of the electoral vote it'd be an improvement.:cool: