Court tells obama sit down and shut up!!!!!

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/arizona/today/news/politics/article.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=DA41EGE82

Appeals court panel rules Obama recess appointments to labor board are unconstitutional

01-25-2013 01:16 PM MST |By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press
Enlarge This Image (http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpg#enlarge|363|242)

http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpgRichard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that he will re-nominate Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a role that he has held for the last year under a recess appointment, and nominate Mary Joe White to lead the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)



WASHINGTON (Associated Press) --In a setback for President Barack Obama, a federal appeals court ruled Friday that he violated the Constitution in making recess appointments last year, a decision that could severely curtail the president's ability to bypass the Senate to fill administration vacancies.
The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board because the Senate was officially in session _ and not in recess _ at the time. If the decision stands, it could invalidate hundreds of board decisions made over the past year.
The court also ruled that the president could only make recess appointments if the openings arise when the Senate is in an official recess, which it defined as the once-a-year break between sessions of Congress.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^^^ Take that obama, you arrogant little b@stard.
A size 16 boot firmly placed in your nether regions! - :laugh2:---Tyr

Simply brilliant decision, that lets boy wonder know he is not god..

[ConHog]

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/arizona/today/news/politics/article.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=DA41EGE82

Appeals court panel rules Obama recess appointments to labor board are unconstitutional

01-25-2013 01:16 PM MST |By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press
Enlarge This Image (http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpg#enlarge|363|242)

http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpgRichard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that he will re-nominate Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a role that he has held for the last year under a recess appointment, and nominate Mary Joe White to lead the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)



WASHINGTON (Associated Press) --In a setback for President Barack Obama, a federal appeals court ruled Friday that he violated the Constitution in making recess appointments last year, a decision that could severely curtail the president's ability to bypass the Senate to fill administration vacancies.
The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board because the Senate was officially in session _ and not in recess _ at the time. If the decision stands, it could invalidate hundreds of board decisions made over the past year.
The court also ruled that the president could only make recess appointments if the openings arise when the Senate is in an official recess, which it defined as the once-a-year break between sessions of Congress.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^^^ Take that obama, you arrogant little b@stard.
A size 16 boot firmly placed in your nether regions! - :laugh2:---Tyrg

merge please


http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?38919-Obama-recess-appointments-unconstitutional-court

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Today, 07:32 PM<input type="checkbox" class="postimod" id="post_imod_checkbox_611366" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: absolute; right: 10px; top: 5px;">
ConHog (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2163-ConHog)
I'm in YOUR head

<label>This message is hidden because ConHog is on your ignore list (http://www.debatepolicy.com/profile.php?do=ignorelist).</label>View Post (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?38926-Court-tells-obama-sit-down-and-shut-up!!!!!&p=611366#post611366)

Remove user from ignore list (http://www.debatepolicy.com/profile.php?userlist=ignore&do=removelist&u=2163)


:laugh2:....-Tyr

[ConHog]

Today, 07:32 PM<input class="postimod" id="post_imod_checkbox_611366" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: absolute; right: 10px; top: 5px;" type="checkbox">
ConHog (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2163-ConHog)
I'm in YOUR head

<label>This message is hidden because ConHog is on your ignore list (http://www.debatepolicy.com/profile.php?do=ignorelist).</label>

View Post (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?38926-Court-tells-obama-sit-down-and-shut-up!!!!!&p=611366#post611366)
Remove user from ignore list (http://www.debatepolicy.com/profile.php?userlist=ignore&do=removelist&u=2163)


:laugh2:....-Tyr




^ thread ban please.

[red states rule]

^ thread ban please.

When you are a mod you can make those calls. Until then stop trying to boss people around

[ConHog]

When you are a mod you can make those calls. Until then stop trying to boss people around

you don't have to be a mod to request that a thread be moved RSR. I suspect you knew that though.

Oh, and requesting a thread merge isn't bossing anyone around, I suspect you knew that to.

[red states rule]

you don't have to be a mod to request that a thread be moved RSR. I suspect you knew that though.

Oh, and requesting a thread merge isn't bossing anyone around, I suspect you knew that to.

Eh, I was responding to your call for a thread ban genius :laugh2:

[ConHog]

Eh, I was responding to your call for a thread ban genius :laugh2:


that was still a request genius.


Would you like a reminder of one of the many times you have told me to leave the board?

Hypocrite.

[aboutime]

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/arizona/today/news/politics/article.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=DA41EGE82

Appeals court panel rules Obama recess appointments to labor board are unconstitutional

01-25-2013 01:16 PM MST |By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press
Enlarge This Image (http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpg#enlarge|363|242)

http://images.cox.com/media/apimages/ap-image-f80795cb-fed1-49c0-a375-67bafe43b929.jpgRichard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that he will re-nominate Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a role that he has held for the last year under a recess appointment, and nominate Mary Joe White to lead the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)



WASHINGTON (Associated Press) --In a setback for President Barack Obama, a federal appeals court ruled Friday that he violated the Constitution in making recess appointments last year, a decision that could severely curtail the president's ability to bypass the Senate to fill administration vacancies.
The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board because the Senate was officially in session _ and not in recess _ at the time. If the decision stands, it could invalidate hundreds of board decisions made over the past year.
The court also ruled that the president could only make recess appointments if the openings arise when the Senate is in an official recess, which it defined as the once-a-year break between sessions of Congress.





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^^^ Take that obama, you arrogant little b@stard.
A size 16 boot firmly placed in your nether regions! - :laugh2:---Tyr

Simply brilliant decision, that lets boy wonder know he is not god..


Tyr. Court decisions, or Judges mean nothing to Obama. He's got the A.G. Holder running the Justice Department. So...nothing stands in his way. He can have the judges fired, or the decisions reversed by other, more Liberal courts.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

THIS THREAD IS INTENDED TO BE ABOUT OBAMA'S COMING REACTION TO HAVING HIS WORTHLESS FACE SLAPPED BY THE COURTS.
Have no knowledge of what any other thread is about.-Tyr

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Tyr. Court decisions, or Judges mean nothing to Obama. He's got the A.G. Holder running the Justice Department. So...nothing stands in his way. He can have the judges fired, or the decisions reversed by other, more Liberal courts.

We shall see my friend. What do you think the punk will do?? Cry on Michelle's shoulders or beg Soros to tell him how to react??:laugh2:

[aboutime]

We shall see my friend. What do you think the punk will do?? Cry on Michelle's shoulders or beg Soros to tell him how to react??:laugh2:


Since he's such a great PRETENDER. I suspect he will just PRETEND there was no court decision, and continue as before.
After an unreasonable time. I also suspect. He will attempt to use another Executive Order to override everything else...like the Constitution. And we all know. The Constitution no longer stands in Obama's way when it comes to BREAKING THE RULES, and LAWS.

[ConHog]

Tyr. Court decisions, or Judges mean nothing to Obama. He's got the A.G. Holder running the Justice Department. So...nothing stands in his way. He can have the judges fired, or the decisions reversed by other, more Liberal courts.

Federal judges can't be fired you idiot.

[jimnyc]

Moved to cage - duplicate thread which hit the shitter within a few short posts

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Moved to cage - duplicate thread which hit the shitter within a few short posts

NOT FROM THE AUTHOR'S OP or from my replies it didnt..-Tyr

[aboutime]

Moved to cage - duplicate thread which hit the shitter within a few short posts


jimnyc. Why?

[jimnyc]

NOT FROM THE AUTHOR'S OP or from my replies it didnt..-Tyr

I think your opening post was the ONLY post in this thread to be on topic. 99% of it is fighting and deserving of the cage. Had this not been a duplicate thread, I would have moved the posts and left your thread intact.

[jimnyc]

jimnyc. Why?

As above ^^