PDA

View Full Version : Dems Haven’t Passed a Budget in Four Years Because of Filibustering R's



red states rule
03-07-2013, 04:20 AM
This guy has a great political future in the Dem party.

He has no idea regarding the rues of the Senate. He can lie with a straight face. And he can pass the buck better then Obama

So what if the rules of Senate state that budget proposals need only a simple majority to pass and thus cannot be filibustered?

No lib would ever allow the truth and facts to get in the way of their talking points

The sad part is about half the voters will swallow this crap hook, line, and sinker - and the liberal media will not call him on his lie



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GvfHLfZsPFs


and we have this clown saying the say think on Meet the Depressed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHYQZd6p3bM&feature=player_embedded

aboutime
03-08-2013, 10:27 PM
Meet the depressed....4656 or Blame the Filibuster that has nothing to do with 60 votes.

4657

jimnyc
03-09-2013, 11:24 AM
Just more excuses and denial. They can't pass a budget because their proposals SUCK and they can't even get their own party fully on board, let alone Republicans. And why worry about a budget when you have a president willing to bypass them and do what he pleases with money anyway?

They should do like they do with the Pope, a conclave of sorts. Stick all these idiots in a room, with no roof of course, and they aren't allowed to leave until they pass a budget. Either that, or fire all of them, and put people in there that are willing to do their jobs.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
03-09-2013, 11:27 AM
That is because an actual budget would place a limit on their spending. Obama and Reid want it where they can spend what ever amount they please then later claim it is a debt ,pay up suckers!
No Republican president that ever lived could get away with that but obama does because the media lies for him.
Avery willing and eager accomplice he has firmly in his control!!

Does not matter that he is not a God because the media treats him as if he is!!
Compare that treatment to how Bush was treated to get levelof out right hypocrisy and corruption in the mainstream media today. Were there any justice in the world today most of the media in this country would be in prison or executed imho.--Tyr

gabosaurus
03-09-2013, 12:54 PM
Congress (BOTH parties) is lame and inept and needs to be replaced en masse.

Robert A Whit
03-09-2013, 03:31 PM
Congress (BOTH parties) is lame and inept and needs to be replaced en masse.

Well, they never missed a single budget during Bush.

We told and told you, Obama does not know how to lead.

This budget impasse is done by Reid and no other Senator.

red states rule
03-17-2013, 05:20 AM
Congress (BOTH parties) is lame and inept and needs to be replaced en masse.

Could you please tell us the names of the incumbent Dems you voted against in the last election?

aboutime
03-18-2013, 05:15 PM
The reason the Dems, and Obama haven't passed a Federal Budget in Four years is...

All they have are...4701 and they always use the 4702 game.

gabosaurus
03-18-2013, 06:21 PM
Well, they never missed a single budget during Bush.

We told and told you, Obama does not know how to lead.

This budget impasse is done by Reid and no other Senator.

So Boehnhead has nothing to do with the budget not getting passed?

aboutime
03-18-2013, 06:24 PM
So Boehnhead has nothing to do with the budget not getting passed?


I hate to feed the Trolls but, gabby. You sound like Obama. Always forgetting, or intentionally never mentioning HARRY(Roadblock)Reid.

He runs the Senate, and has NOT permitted ANYONE to vote for, or on a budget for four years. So, you blame Boehner because YOU ARE STUPID.

Robert A Whit
03-18-2013, 06:54 PM
So Boehnhead has nothing to do with the budget not getting passed?

Congress has produced one every year.

We are still waiting on Democrats and particularly the Senate operated by Democrats for their first ever during Obama. Obama ought to kick his Democrats in their keysters.

red states rule
03-19-2013, 03:42 AM
Could you please tell us the names of the incumbent Dems you voted against in the last election?

Looks like Gabby voted her usual straight Dem ticket as she normally does

red states rule
03-19-2013, 03:43 AM
So Boehnhead has nothing to do with the budget not getting passed?

The House did it s job and passed a budget every year. It is your side, the side of "compromise" that simply refused to do their job and pas a budget. Many Dems did not want their fingerprints on a trillion dollar deficit year after year

red states rule
03-19-2013, 03:59 AM
That is because an actual budget would place a limit on their spending. Obama and Reid want it where they can spend what ever amount they please then later claim it is a debt ,pay up suckers!
No Republican president that ever lived could get away with that but obama does because the media lies for him.
Avery willing and eager accomplice he has firmly in his control!!

Does not matter that he is not a God because the media treats him as if he is!!
Compare that treatment to how Bush was treated to get levelof out right hypocrisy and corruption in the mainstream media today. Were there any justice in the world today most of the media in this country would be in prison or executed imho.--Tyr

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gv031813dAPR20130318044512.jpg

aboutime
03-19-2013, 03:30 PM
The House did it s job and passed a budget every year. It is your side, the side of "compromise" that simply refused to do their job and pas a budget. Many Dems did not want their fingerprints on a trillion dollar deficit year after year


red states rule. No disrespect intended here, but....You just managed to confuse gabby much more than she was before she asked her stupid question.
We must be careful, and kind when talking (typing) too fast for gabby. Confusion, combined with stupidity always ends up being DUMB.

Robert A Whit
03-19-2013, 03:59 PM
http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by red states rule http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=625071#post625071)

The House did it s job and passed a budget every year. It is your side, the side of "compromise" that simply refused to do their job and pas a budget. Many Dems did not want their fingerprints on a trillion dollar deficit year after year



red states rule. No disrespect intended here, but....You just managed to confuse gabby much more than she was before she asked her stupid question.
We must be careful, and kind when talking (typing) too fast for gabby. Confusion, combined with stupidity always ends up being DUMB.

Red states rule did not mention Gabby.

Why did you?

red states rule
03-20-2013, 03:24 AM
red states rule. No disrespect intended here, but....You just managed to confuse gabby much more than she was before she asked her stupid question.
We must be careful, and kind when talking (typing) too fast for gabby. Confusion, combined with stupidity always ends up being DUMB.

Gabby has become confused all on her own. She is a liberal elitist who goes through life looking down on anyone who has a different opinion on the role and size of government. I wonder if she tells the troubled kids she works with that the "rich" have kept them down and stolen the money they are entitled to. Or that government is the answer to all their problems and that is Bush's fault they have the problems they have. I would not be surprised if that is the case

red states rule
03-20-2013, 03:25 AM
Red states rule did not mention Gabby.

Why did you?

I was responding to Gabby's insane comment with facts, logic, and reason and AT picked up on that cheap debate tactic that drive libs over the edge