PDA

View Full Version : We Have The Power



TheSage
05-31-2007, 09:04 AM
I wonder how our fascist government will react when we assert these rights.

Our leaders are destroying our nation with trade policy designed not to help americans, but only to cut labor costs and boost corporate profits, and please foreign dictators.

They are destroying our borders for this same goal.

Bush has given himself power to assume control of the government in "emergency situations". Can you say "transparent power grab"?

We Have The Power to say no, though our leaders will deny it. They are completely corrupt.


Don't forget, we have the power and right to change things.


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness"

theHawk
05-31-2007, 09:14 AM
That kind of talk falls on deaf ears here.

TheSage
05-31-2007, 09:17 AM
yes. These neocons are fascist sellouts, brainwashed noahide zombies, if you will, who somehow in their subpar intellects believe they're good americans. It'd be funny if it weren't so tragic.

avatar4321
05-31-2007, 02:29 PM
No! I have the power!

Baron Von Esslingen
05-31-2007, 10:53 PM
yes. These neocons are fascist sellouts, brainwashed noahide zombies, if you will, who somehow in their subpar intellects believe they're good americans. It'd be funny if it weren't so tragic.

And the fucking Chinese are laughing all the way to the bank...

nevadamedic
06-01-2007, 01:07 AM
I wonder how our fascist government will react when we assert these rights.

Our leaders are destroying our nation with trade policy designed not to help americans, but only to cut labor costs and boost corporate profits, and please foreign dictators.

They are destroying our borders for this same goal.

Bush has given himself power to assume control of the government in "emergency situations". Can you say "transparent power grab"?

We Have The Power to say no, though our leaders will deny it. They are completely corrupt.


Don't forget, we have the power and right to change things.

:eek:

chum43
06-01-2007, 01:55 AM
yes. These neocons are fascist sellouts, brainwashed noahide zombies, if you will, who somehow in their subpar intellects believe they're good americans. It'd be funny if it weren't so tragic.

it's amazing how well neocons have been made to believe that if you are against big government controlling everything and acting against the will and the good of people then you are an anti-american liberal... there is no logic or reasoning with people who think everything is A-ok because the news tells them so, and our leaders say it's for our own good... meanwhile we're all getting fucked so some elites can make more money and buy off the government in the process.

a lot of it is because of all the stupid people out there opposing neocons, having a hard on for thinking and saying that bush is singlehandedly trying to take over the world and ruin America, he's no worse than any other president we've had for the last few decades... he's just a pawn in a much bigger game, this partisan bullshit is making it hard for anyone to be taken seriously who thinks things need to drastically change.

Psychoblues
06-01-2007, 03:27 AM
Jesus, I wondered when someone would speak that out loud!!!!!!!!!!!!



I wonder how our fascist government will react when we assert these rights.

Our leaders are destroying our nation with trade policy designed not to help americans, but only to cut labor costs and boost corporate profits, and please foreign dictators.

They are destroying our borders for this same goal.

Bush has given himself power to assume control of the government in "emergency situations". Can you say "transparent power grab"?

We Have The Power to say no, though our leaders will deny it. They are completely corrupt.


Don't forget, we have the power and right to change things.

I am committed to change things. Where do we start? Is the Conspiracy Forum a proper place to start this revolution?

TheSage
06-01-2007, 07:53 AM
I guess this is the best place on this site, since most here dismiss obvious proof of a coming fascist international order as CONSPIRACY THEORY, even though it's all documented within public view. They just can't believe people like Pat Robertson would lead them astray. or they misinterpret the bible to mean that "it's ok to be complicit in satan's hierarchy because it was foretold".

DragonStryk72
06-01-2007, 11:36 AM
Sage, you are right, and a few years ago I would have told you that you were wrong, but as I have started to see the way that things are being run, I just can't fathom how it got this bad. I kow logically that this is a problem that has been going for a good while, probably since McCarthyism got going, at least, if not longer. It seems, though, as if it just suddenly appeared, because before I did not see it.

We do need to get back to simple government, a government that everyone can really understand. The scariest words in our language these days can be summed up as, "I'm from the federal government, and I'm here to help."

there is another line of the declaration that is also useful in this: "Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security"

My thought is that the first order of business is a question, "What do we want?"

TheSage
06-01-2007, 11:52 AM
Sage, you are right, and a few years ago I would have told you that you were wrong, but as I have started to see the way that things are being run, I just can't fathom how it got this bad. I kow logically that this is a problem that has been going for a good while, probably since McCarthyism got going, at least, if not longer. It seems, though, as if it just suddenly appeared, because before I did not see it.

We do need to get back to simple government, a government that everyone can really understand. The scariest words in our language these days can be summed up as, "I'm from the federal government, and I'm here to help."

there is another line of the declaration that is also useful in this: "Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security"

My thought is that the first order of business is a question, "What do we want?"


Disband the PRIVATE CORPORATION that controls our money supply, The Federal Reserve. Reindex the dollar to some kind of tangible good, perhaps a grouping of commodities, soybeans, gold, silver, oil. Limit trade to partners with the same view of individual rights and freedom, so the barbarity of servitude and slavery is not rewarded with the dollars of the free. Mandatory gun ownership for all adults over 21. Just a couple ideas. what have you got?

Monkeybone
06-01-2007, 12:39 PM
why the gun owership? to defend/rise against when a call to arms is ushered?

TheSage
06-01-2007, 12:53 PM
why the gun owership? to defend/rise against when a call to arms is ushered?

Yep. And because it will make violent crime virtually non-existant, and because guns are cool.

Monkeybone
06-01-2007, 02:19 PM
agreed. but if they do that, then you should have to qualify every month or so. would they do regular screenings on ppl to make sure that they ain't nutzoid?

TheSage
06-01-2007, 02:44 PM
agreed. but if they do that, then you should have to qualify every month or so. would they do regular screenings on ppl to make sure that they ain't nutzoid?

Only upon evidence of schizoid behavior. A vehicle is just as lethal as a gun, and we let any idiot get a drivers license.

OCA
06-01-2007, 02:53 PM
Fascist.......upon use of that word, with no evidence to back up using that word, the author immediately relegates himself to obscurity, it has always been this way with this author.

I am currently exploring business opportunities and investment in China, its a money pot for capitalists like me.

TheSage
06-01-2007, 03:00 PM
Fascist.......upon use of that word, with no evidence to back up using that word, the author immediately relegates himself to obscurity, it has always been this way with this author.

I am currently exploring business opportunities and investment in China, its a money pot for capitalists like me.



Fascism is the unification of government and corporate interests. When the laws of the government are continually subverted and created through the influence of corporate cash, a state of de facto fascism is the result. Yes, China is a good example of a fascist state.

OCA
06-01-2007, 03:27 PM
Fascism is the unification of government and corporate interests. When the laws of the government are continually subverted and created through the influence of corporate cash, a state of de facto fascism is the result. Yes, China is a good example of a fascist state.

And what you describe is not happening in America.

Oh almost forgot, tonight i'll bring up quotes from you endorsing outsourcing and scolding me when I was pissed at Bush and saying I was jumping ship to the Constitution Party........we will discuss at that time your hypocricy(sp?).

5stringJeff
06-01-2007, 04:24 PM
Disband the PRIVATE CORPORATION that controls our money supply, The Federal Reserve. Reindex the dollar to some kind of tangible good, perhaps a grouping of commodities, soybeans, gold, silver, oil.

Now THAT, I can agree with, although I'd peg the dollar to silver.

Psychoblues
06-03-2007, 02:45 AM
Excellent description and example of fascism, Sage.



Fascism is the unification of government and corporate interests. When the laws of the government are continually subverted and created through the influence of corporate cash, a state of de facto fascism is the result. Yes, China is a good example of a fascist state.

I repeated it here because many of our friends need to read and understand it. But, the post is actually directed towards the poster that promised hypocrisy and the ability to deliver.

Did you get that, oca?

TheSage
06-04-2007, 06:12 AM
And what you describe is not happening in America.

Oh almost forgot, tonight i'll bring up quotes from you endorsing outsourcing and scolding me when I was pissed at Bush and saying I was jumping ship to the Constitution Party........we will discuss at that time your hypocricy(sp?).



Don't bother. I freely admit I used t be a naive 'the market is always moral' fascist idiot like you. The difference is, I've wisened up. you give it a try. When I'm wrong, I admit it. Sounds like you had the right instinct back then. Did you change positions to be popular?

Hobbit
06-04-2007, 12:07 PM
I definitely have faith in the free market, but when unions, corporate lobbyists, and socialists (like The Hildabeast) put so much governmental fiat directly into the middle of the market, how free is it? You can't buy raw milk due to a government fiat mandating pasteurization for all dairy products. If I know it's not pasteurized, shouldn't I be allowed to decide for myself if I'm willing to risk drinking it? It's also illegal to import European cheese for the same reason, but I rarely see Euros walking around with mass infections from cheese cultures. If I think it's worthwhile to work for only $2/hour, why should I be forbidden by the federal government? What if I don't care how well my car crumples in an accident? Then there's talks of this fairness doctrine which will all but remove my ability to choose what media I consume. The free market is a wonderful thing...if it's free.

As for rebellion against the government, I don't think we're there yet, but I've begun to think it's inevitably moving that way. I think that within my lifetime (I'm 24), we, the people, will have to either fight or accept our chains. While nobody can, with all honesty, say what they'd do in that situation, I'm leaning towards fight. Chains suck.

Psychoblues
06-05-2007, 03:35 AM
Your faith is quite evident, hibbit.



I definitely have faith in the free market, but when unions, corporate lobbyists, and socialists (like The Hildabeast) put so much governmental fiat directly into the middle of the market, how free is it? You can't buy raw milk due to a government fiat mandating pasteurization for all dairy products. If I know it's not pasteurized, shouldn't I be allowed to decide for myself if I'm willing to risk drinking it? It's also illegal to import European cheese for the same reason, but I rarely see Euros walking around with mass infections from cheese cultures. If I think it's worthwhile to work for only $2/hour, why should I be forbidden by the federal government? What if I don't care how well my car crumples in an accident? Then there's talks of this fairness doctrine which will all but remove my ability to choose what media I consume. The free market is a wonderful thing...if it's free.

As for rebellion against the government, I don't think we're there yet, but I've begun to think it's inevitably moving that way. I think that within my lifetime (I'm 24), we, the people, will have to either fight or accept our chains. While nobody can, with all honesty, say what they'd do in that situation, I'm leaning towards fight. Chains suck.

As is your ignorance.

Hobbit
06-05-2007, 09:10 AM
Your faith is quite evident, hibbit.




As is your ignorance.

Care to back that up with anything, or is your opinion divine inspiration?

OCA
06-05-2007, 01:44 PM
Don't bother. I freely admit I used t be a naive 'the market is always moral' fascist idiot like you. The difference is, I've wisened up. you give it a try. When I'm wrong, I admit it. Sounds like you had the right instinct back then. Did you change positions to be popular?


No because capitalism, unfettered capitalism, trumps all else. I believe in minimal, and I mean minimal government interference in the affairs of private business.

Private business, today's private business is moral, very moral despite what anti-achievers like you say, they know that bad publicity, the kind that abuse of workers wouyld bring would drive down business and profits so companies and corporations bend over backwards to accomodate workers in the form of benefits, profit sharing, retirement plans etc. etc.

In the case of China it is up to the Chinese people to change their labor laws from within and sure as there is a God those things will change from within, as the populace becomes more wealthy and desires the finer things in life such as personal freedoms the government will soon have to choose between the things that a monied poulace brings through capitalism or they will have to crackdown and go back to being broke......gee wonder which one they will choose? Americans should not be hindered in anyway, shape or form from capitalizing on China's emerging capitalism because some stupid fucking bleeding heart is sad because some 16 yr old from Shangzu is working in a factory in Bejing now. Tough shit, its a shitty world sometimes, can't save them all.

OCA
06-05-2007, 01:46 PM
Excellent description and example of fascism, Sage.




I repeated it here because many of our friends need to read and understand it. But, the post is actually directed towards the poster that promised hypocrisy and the ability to deliver.

Did you get that, oca?

Read post #21 douchebag, RWA freely admitted that I had him dead to rights.

BTW nice work on the Cosa Nostra thread, thought you were gonna hand my ass to me? Anyway a bet is a bet......pay up and get the fuck off my board!

OCA
06-05-2007, 01:50 PM
Care to back that up with anything, or is your opinion divine inspiration?

Hobbit deep down Psycho is like all liberals, he believes that government knows better than the individual, that we are too stupid to make our own decisions. Psycho believes in personal freedom about as much as Joe Gibbs believes in an all out passing game.

Psychoblues
06-07-2007, 05:00 AM
I saw no such free admission.


Read post #21 douchebag, RWA freely admitted that I had him dead to rights.

BTW nice work on the Cosa Nostra thread, thought you were gonna hand my ass to me? Anyway a bet is a bet......pay up and get the fuck off my board!

Maybe that's your problem, you're always looking for a free admission. As far as owing you anything I am giving you all I care to. Is this "your board"? You tried to make it "your board" and you got your ass handed to you in an instant.

Keep dreamin' oca, and braggin' about that scooter you call a "bike". If you're just scared then say you're scared and we can get on with adult conversations.

Do you maintain your homoerotic assertations, double dimple chin?

TheSage
06-07-2007, 05:34 AM
Read post #21 douchebag, RWA freely admitted that I had him dead to rights.

BTW nice work on the Cosa Nostra thread, thought you were gonna hand my ass to me? Anyway a bet is a bet......pay up and get the fuck off my board!

I said were right about some minor issue about what you referring to in a post to darin. On no substantive issue are you right.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 05:36 AM
Hobbit deep down Psycho is like all liberals, he believes that government knows better than the individual, that we are too stupid to make our own decisions. Psycho believes in personal freedom about as much as Joe Gibbs believes in an all out passing game.

And you believe corporations know better than the individual, that's no better.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 05:40 AM
No because capitalism, unfettered capitalism, trumps all else. I believe in minimal, and I mean minimal government interference in the affairs of private business.

Private business, today's private business is moral, very moral despite what anti-achievers like you say, they know that bad publicity, the kind that abuse of workers wouyld bring would drive down business and profits so companies and corporations bend over backwards to accomodate workers in the form of benefits, profit sharing, retirement plans etc. etc.

In the case of China it is up to the Chinese people to change their labor laws from within and sure as there is a God those things will change from within, as the populace becomes more wealthy and desires the finer things in life such as personal freedoms the government will soon have to choose between the things that a monied poulace brings through capitalism or they will have to crackdown and go back to being broke......gee wonder which one they will choose? Americans should not be hindered in anyway, shape or form from capitalizing on China's emerging capitalism because some stupid fucking bleeding heart is sad because some 16 yr old from Shangzu is working in a factory in Bejing now. Tough shit, its a shitty world sometimes, can't save them all.


The totalitarian leadership of china does not aim to give their people upward mobility. They like the have and have not system. They have no mechanism in place for people to change law. It's called a dictatorship, dumbass.

But in the case of the US, it is up to us to make sure our worker class is not completely destroyed by competition from a slave labor economy and that our nation in general is not destroyed by that same slave labor nation builiding an army against us. Life is shitty sometimes, but as humans we help each other, instead of plunging with gusto into the satanic cycle of abuse you love so well. Your embrace of evil is not a beacon of wisdom, or an attitude to be emulated, it's just a footnote documenting the erosion of your moral character.

Oh hey, OCA, did unions EVER play a role in creating the great middle class in america?

TheSage
06-07-2007, 05:50 AM
DO the rest of you "conservatives" buy into OCA's vision of an "anything for a buck" world? Take this movement and shove it if this is what it was all for. Reagan is crying.

Psychoblues
06-07-2007, 06:34 AM
God Bless You, Sage.



The totalitarian leadership of china does not aim to give their people upward mobility. They like the have and have not system. They have no mechanism in place for people to change law. It's called a dictatorship, dumbass.

But in the case of the US, it is up to us to make sure our worker class is not completely destroyed by competition from a slave labor economy and that our nation in general is not destroyed by that same slave labor nation builiding an army against us. Life is shitty sometimes, but as humans we help each other, instead of plunging with gusto into the satanic cycle of abuse you love so well. Your embrace of evil is not a beacon of wisdom, or an attitude to be emulated, it's just a footnote documenting the erosion of your moral character.

Oh hey, OCA, did unions EVER play a role in creating the great middle class in america?

Without Unions of American workers, there would have never been this benefit of the internet to speak to one another. That is lost on many of our population.

Although I would like to ultimately thank GOD for the ability of my parents to provide me with an average upbringing I have to also thank the trade and professional Unions that allowed and provided them with the voice and wherewithal to expect and demand a fair shake in the marketplace of American labour. If fairness was ever a consideration of the capitalists the Unions would have never been necessary. They, the unions, are now more necessary than ever.

We will be in the streets soon enough to demand simply a fair shake in this economic equation.

OCA
06-07-2007, 09:10 AM
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0529/p01s02-usec.html?page=2

OCA
06-07-2007, 09:11 AM
Oh hey, OCA, did unions EVER play a role in creating the great middle class in america?

Very little.

Psychoblues
06-07-2007, 09:13 AM
I'll tell you about "very little", oca.



Very little.

YOU are "very little".

OCA
06-07-2007, 09:16 AM
I'll tell you about "very little", oca.




YOU are "very little".

Oh thats so cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about you stop running, address the union problem in Detroit and address post#101 in the "support the troops thread"?

But then again its always been your M.O. for better than 3 years now to run when cornered, ain't it Psycho?

Psychoblues
06-07-2007, 09:25 AM
You are such a freaking coward, oca.



Oh thats so cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about you stop running, address the union problem in Detroit and address post#101 in the "support the troops thread"?

But then again its always been your M.O. for better than 3 years now to run when cornered, ain't it Psycho?

Not to mention that you are also a liar. I've addressed these issues. Tough shit if you have purposely ignored my comments.

I don't think you are "cute" at all and I have never said so. Why do you insist on your meaningless flirtations?

OCA
06-07-2007, 09:29 AM
You are such a freaking coward, oca.




Not to mention that you are also a liar. I've addressed these issues. Tough shit if you have purposely ignored my comments.

I don't think you are "cute" at all and I have never said so. Why do you insist on your meaningless flirtations?

Where, just perused that thread and this and nowhere did you address either.

Stop being a baldfaced fucking liar.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 12:11 PM
Very little.


So no wonder you think the free market is always moral and fair, you're ignorant.

OCA
06-07-2007, 12:20 PM
So no wonder you think the free market is always moral and fair, you're ignorant.

Unions had their place about 80 or 90 years ago but today are largely irrelevant with the maturation of businesses and corporations. Unions are basically in it to rape businesses of as much profit as they can for as little work as they can get away with.

Unions are antithetical to the American way.

OCA
06-07-2007, 12:21 PM
Hey RWA address post#34 if you would, Psycho refused.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 01:09 PM
Hey RWA address post#34 if you would, Psycho refused.



Restate your argument like a grown man and I'll consider dialogueing further. short of that, I consider myself the winner and you an ignorant hack.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 01:53 PM
Unions had their place about 80 or 90 years ago but today are largely irrelevant with the maturation of businesses and corporations. Unions are basically in it to rape businesses of as much profit as they can for as little work as they can get away with.

Unions are antithetical to the American way.

Which is it, they had their place or they're antithetical to america?

OCA
06-07-2007, 02:01 PM
Which is it, they had their place or they're antithetical to america?


They had their place but now are antithetical to modern day America.

OCA
06-07-2007, 02:02 PM
Restate your argument like a grown man and I'll consider dialogueing further. short of that, I consider myself the winner and you an ignorant hack.

The only thing you won is my balls on your chin. Address the unions being the ruin of auto America in post #34.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 02:15 PM
The only thing you won is my balls on your chin. Address the unions being the ruin of auto America in post #34.

They took it too far, asked for too much. This doesn't negate the concept of BASIC worker protections.

OCA
06-07-2007, 02:18 PM
They took it too far, asked for too much. This doesn't negate the concept of BASIC worker protections.

Just goes to show you that unions are no longer viable and needed in today's modern society. With corporate maturation ALL benefit contracts should be negotiated directly between management and employees.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 02:24 PM
Just goes to show you that unions are no longer viable and needed in today's modern society. With corporate maturation ALL benefit contracts should be negotiated directly between management and employees.


No. We must remain vigilant that legal worker protections stay in place even though things seem good right now. Faith placed in the benevolence of coporations is faith misplaced.

OCA
06-07-2007, 02:43 PM
No. We must remain vigilant that legal worker protections stay in place even though things seem good right now. Faith placed in the benevolence of coporations is faith misplaced.

You have no faith in America it seems. You need outside help in order for you to succeed it seems.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 02:56 PM
You have no faith in America it seems. You need outside help in order for you to succeed it seems.


It doesn't seem that way at all. It just seems you think evil, selfishness, and mistreatment of others is what it means to be an American. You're fucked in the head, senor sicko.

OCA
06-07-2007, 03:09 PM
It doesn't seem that way at all. It just seems you think evil, selfishness, and mistreatment of others is what it means to be an American. You're fucked in the head, senor sicko.


No, its just easier for you to hate achievers if you label them this way with preconceived notions. It makes you feel better about yourself.

TheSage
06-07-2007, 03:32 PM
No, its just easier for you to hate achievers if you label them this way with preconceived notions. It makes you feel better about yourself.

I don't hate achievers, I merely feel like business should be constrained and balanced by other factors, moral factors, long term security considerations etc. Complicated adult things.

theHawk
06-07-2007, 03:36 PM
I don't hate achievers, I merely feel like business should be constrained and balanced by other factors, moral factors, long term security considerations etc. Complicated adult things.

Morality is irrelivant in today's business world. The almighty dollar is the bottom line. If it makes money, its righteous.

nevadamedic
06-07-2007, 04:29 PM
I wonder how our fascist government will react when we assert these rights.

Our leaders are destroying our nation with trade policy designed not to help americans, but only to cut labor costs and boost corporate profits, and please foreign dictators.

They are destroying our borders for this same goal.

Bush has given himself power to assume control of the government in "emergency situations". Can you say "transparent power grab"?

We Have The Power to say no, though our leaders will deny it. They are completely corrupt.


Don't forget, we have the power and right to change things.

The RWA strikes again.

Kathianne
06-07-2007, 04:31 PM
I wonder how our fascist government will react when we assert these rights.

Our leaders are destroying our nation with trade policy designed not to help americans, but only to cut labor costs and boost corporate profits, and please foreign dictators.

They are destroying our borders for this same goal.

Bush has given himself power to assume control of the government in "emergency situations". Can you say "transparent power grab"?

We Have The Power to say no, though our leaders will deny it. They are completely corrupt.


Don't forget, we have the power and right to change things.

What about the great number that disagree with them and you?

TheSage
06-07-2007, 04:37 PM
What about the great number that disagree with them and you?


What's them? WHo's them? Please refine your question.

Psychoblues
06-20-2007, 11:45 PM
You are totally obsessed with "balls on chin", oca.



The only thing you won is my balls on your chin. Address the unions being the ruin of auto America in post #34.

Just how many balls have you had on your chin and tell us how much you like it?

Hagbard Celine
06-21-2007, 11:12 AM
That kind of talk falls on deaf ears here.

I hear it. I've been saying it here and there too. The current system is broken but the framework still exists. It's underneath the garbage pile of laws that have been made to circumvent the constitution, waterdown the rights of states and individuals and line the pockets of greedy bureacrats. This is one of the reasons the second amendment exists. It's so that the people can take back their government by force if necessary. Once again though, the government has made laws that prohibit citizens from both organizing militias AND owning the level of firepower needed to fight the government.

Yurt
06-21-2007, 02:43 PM
They had their place but now are antithetical to modern day America.

So then corporations were out of control and taking advantage of people? And the unions brought balance to the economy?

OCA
06-21-2007, 04:55 PM
So then corporations were out of control and taking advantage of people? And the unions brought balance to the economy?

No, 100+years ago industry and business were immature in America doing things such as employing 10 yr olds at slave wages in mines etc. etc., unions put an end to practices such as those but corporations have grown and matured and unions have morphed into getting the most for their members for the least amount of work.

Unions need to be abolished and business needs to be deregulated.

nevadamedic
06-22-2007, 01:12 AM
No, 100+years ago industry and business were immature in America doing things such as employing 10 yr olds at slave wages in mines etc. etc., unions put an end to practices such as those but corporations have grown and matured and unions have morphed into getting the most for their members for the least amount of work.

Unions need to be abolished and business needs to be deregulated.

The Unions have almost always been a racket.

TheSage
06-22-2007, 06:09 AM
The Unions have almost always been a racket.

They became a racket, but had a place early on. You judge them a racket from within the generally egalitarian society they helped create. To forget the past and go to some "industrialists are always moral" mindset is a big mistake.

And oca still seems to have balls on his chin, don't ya think?

TheSage
06-22-2007, 06:10 AM
No, 100+years ago industry and business were immature in America doing things such as employing 10 yr olds at slave wages in mines etc. etc., unions put an end to practices such as those but corporations have grown and matured and unions have morphed into getting the most for their members for the least amount of work.

Unions need to be abolished and business needs to be deregulated.


Businesses were immature then? No. They were forced by law to NOT do that shit. Quit being a moron.

TheSage
06-22-2007, 06:12 AM
Oca with his trash talking wisdom will convince the chinese to abandon totalitarianism. "Quit being so immature", he will say. Then they will stop being immature.

Hagbard Celine
06-22-2007, 08:59 AM
The Unions have almost always been a racket.

Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclaire and come back again with the opinion that unions have always been a racket.

TheSage
06-22-2007, 09:03 AM
Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclaire and come back again with the opinion that unions have always been a racket.

Hey haggy. I was reading the other day about Roosevelt and the MUCKRAKERS. Roosevelt was known for helping the worker, with their journalistic advocates, the MUCKRAKERS, a name roosevelt didn't give them till he turned on them for investigating a company he was allied with.

OCA
06-23-2007, 09:14 AM
Businesses were immature then? No. They were forced by law to NOT do that shit. Quit being a moron.

No, actually they were immature and now they have FULLY matured, time to send the unions packing and commence with the deregulating. Both are useless and bureaucratic in today's society.

OCA
06-23-2007, 09:16 AM
Oca with his trash talking wisdom will convince the chinese to abandon totalitarianism. "Quit being so immature", he will say. Then they will stop being immature.


No the ever growing middle and entreprenurial classes will force that upon the government. Communism's days are numbered in China.

Psychoblues
06-26-2007, 12:56 AM
So, the balls on your chin don't bother you?

OCA
06-26-2007, 02:48 PM
So, the balls on your chin don't bother you?


*OCA listens to the distant sound of the peanut gallery*

:laugh2:

Psychoblues
07-03-2007, 11:32 PM
I somehow knew you would be bringing up nuts, gallery and self promotion into this conversation, oca.



*OCA listens to the distant sound of the peanut gallery*

:laugh2:

Do you fully understand what a waste you are, double dimple chin?

OCA
07-04-2007, 08:09 AM
I somehow knew you would be bringing up nuts, gallery and self promotion into this conversation, oca.




Do you fully understand what a waste you are, double dimple chin?


zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz *yawn*

You are so 2005, a has been. Its pathetic though to watch your desperate attempts to get back into the game and become a player, for crissakes act like a man once in your life and accept the fact that you have been relegated to obscurity...again.

Psychoblues
07-06-2007, 12:44 AM
You may have some success in deregulating and bringing forth of industry that causes hurt not help to the environment in which they for the time are flourishing and you may have some success at condemning unions that are not, as you say, corrupt and you may have some success at making some people feel intimidated but you will never have any success at telling Psychoblues to shut up with any expectation that he will indeed shut up.




zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz *yawn*

You are so 2005, a has been. Its pathetic though to watch your desperate attempts to get back into the game and become a player, for crissakes act like a man once in your life and accept the fact that you have been relegated to obscurity...again.

Dig it, Mr. Double Dimple Chin?

TheSage
07-07-2007, 06:14 AM
No the ever growing middle and entreprenurial classes will force that upon the government. Communism's days are numbered in China.

The mechanisms are not in place in china for the government to respond to the grievances of the people. They're not a democracy. they don't believe in civil rights. When you lay down in front of their tanks, they will run the fuck over you. They're totalitarian fascists. But you respect the mafia, so it's natural for you to want to get some china dick in you too.

Psychoblues
07-09-2007, 12:03 AM
Maybe oca needs to go live in China. That is certainly where his allegiance is and it seems his living as well. How 'bout it, oca? They have the reputation for smaller balls there but you'll get used to it!!!!!!!!

nevadamedic
07-09-2007, 03:50 PM
Maybe oca needs to go live in China. That is certainly where his allegiance is and it seems his living as well. How 'bout it, oca? They have the reputation for smaller balls there but you'll get used to it!!!!!!!!

What a surprise, another flame thread by the master of flaming.

OCA
07-09-2007, 04:01 PM
Nevada, no need for you jumping in. Psycho is my private stash for when i'm hungry and I need to take a bite out of someone's ass.

nevadamedic
07-09-2007, 04:32 PM
Nevada, no need for you jumping in. Psycho is my private stash for when i'm hungry and I need to take a bite out of someone's ass.

I know but still...........

OCA
07-09-2007, 07:47 PM
I know but still...........

What you know?

Sometimes I get the feeling that you post just to post, hell at one point earlier this afternoon you had the last post in 90% of the forums and most of em were just pat the back one liners.

glockmail
07-09-2007, 08:05 PM
Nevada, no need for you jumping in. Psycho is my private stash for when i'm hungry and I need to take a bite out of someone's ass.

Typical Greek. :poke:

Psychoblues
07-12-2007, 02:51 AM
Nekkid wrestling and all, how about it?


Typical Greek. :poke:

The small testicles of the Chinese aren't going to really hurt him, are they?

Psychoblues
07-14-2007, 03:23 AM
Whatever you might think, oca, you WILL NOT BE BITING MY ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!



Nevada, no need for you jumping in. Psycho is my private stash for when i'm hungry and I need to take a bite out of someone's ass.

Why would you want to do such a thing to me? Are those Chinese testicles banging your chin pleasantly or would you prefer larger ones?