PDA

View Full Version : ObamaCare backlash



red states rule
03-27-2013, 02:55 AM
Now we find out there is a $65 tax PER EMPLOYEE employers must pay tucked inside Obamacare. Well, Pelosi was right - they had to pass the bill so we the serfs could find out what was in it

Amazing how all this kicks in now that Obama does not have to face the voters again





It’s worth remembering that President Obama decided not to let his new ObamaCare scheme take effect until 2014. At the time of its passage in 2010, it seemed politically wise to delay its implementation. Republicans won the election of 2010 and lost that of 2012. But the full impact of the new law will begin to become apparent in 2014 and the effect will be horrific, deeply damaging the Obama administration and the Democrats who backed it.

The main brunt of the impact will be on premiums for health insurance coverage. They will skyrocket in very short order. The Heritage Foundation estimates the increases by state. Here’s a sample:

State Premiums rise by
California 42-69 percent
Florida 61 percent
Georgia 61-100 percent
Illinois 61 percent
Michigan 35-63 percent
New Jersey 39 percent
North Carolina 61 percent
Ohio 55-106 percent
Pennsylvania 39 percent
Texas 35-63 percent
Virginia 75-82 percent

Why such draconian increases? Heritage ascribes it to two provisions of the new law.

The first restricts health insurers from charging any one age group more than three times the premium it charges any other one. This 3-1 ratio — typically between the older, non-Medicare portion of the covered population and the young group — is the brain child of the social planners. The actual figure is about 5-1 — it costs about five times as much to insure older patients than younger ones. Because, obviously, companies are not going to cut the premiums for the older patients, they will increase them for the younger ones so they can meet the 3-1 ratio. That means big increases for younger families.


The second provision that pushes up premiums is the tendency of the new law to kill its customers with kindness by requiring all manner of illnesses and treatments to be covered, and covered generously. Mental health, dental care and such are all required in any policy. And the law restricts any effort by insurance companies to limit the utilization of these services. So the premiums will rise for everybody.


The result of this premium inflation will be that more and more employers will refuse to continue to cover their workers and will find it far cheaper to pay the penalties in the law than to underwrite the vastly more expensive policies. Tens of millions of Americans will lose their insurance and have to buy coverage from the insurance exchanges Obama is creating — at a multiple of their current premium’s cost. The ObamaCare subsidies are limited and will not begin to make up for the increased costs. And, to make matters worse, employers will be obliged to pay an annual $65 tax per employee to subsidize catastrophic coverage for the most expensive patients.


Obama’s real goal, of course, is to destroy employment-related insurance and force everyone into the insurance exchanges. This will lay the basis for single-payer, government-funded, socialized medicine in the United States: his stated goal.


The political consequences of these premium increases are going to be horrific. Voters will realize how fraudulent Obama was in predicting average premium cuts of $2,500 per family. And the full dimensions of this misguided law will become apparent.


The result will be a gradual and continuing erosion of Obama’s favorability until he gets his clock cleaned in the 2014 election. Normally, of course, sixth year-elections are a total wipeout for the incumbent party. FDR lost a hundred seats in the House in 1938. Truman lost control of Congress in 1946.


Read more: http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/289153-obamacare-backlash#ixzz2OmeSVoYJ
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bNYbpAvBir4Pxiacwqm_6l&u=thehill) | TheHill on Facebook (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bNYbpAvBir4Pxiacwqm_6l&u=TheHill)

aboutime
03-27-2013, 09:45 PM
Nobody wanted to listen. And today. Everyone who Loved this woman...4776 still have no idea because of Stupidity.

fj1200
03-28-2013, 08:29 AM
Amazing how all this kicks in now that Obama does not have to face the voters again

The result will be a gradual and continuing erosion of Obama’s favorability until he gets his clock cleaned in the 2014 election. Normally, of course, sixth year-elections are a total wipeout for the incumbent party. FDR lost a hundred seats in the House in 1938. Truman lost control of Congress in 1946.

Read more: http://thehill.com/opinion/columnist...#ixzz2OmeSVoYJ (http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/289153-obamacare-backlash#ixzz2OmeSVoYJ)

One can hope for a huge pickup but I don't think we should hang our hat on that six-year rule. Both Reagan and Clinton picked up House seats in their second off-year election. The country was also suffering from a massive recession in '37-'38. I'd say 2006 is more likely where the R's lost 30 seats but it really depends on the economy IMO.

red states rule
03-30-2013, 03:30 AM
http://www.hayabusa.org/forum/attachments/playground/201097d1284237453-funny-pictures-thread-2010-edition-obamacare587.jpg