PDA

View Full Version : Conspriracy theorist were....



revelarts
07-11-2013, 06:01 PM
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/v98o1DXbY4I?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nEwIbwuYwzM?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

revelarts
07-16-2013, 09:16 AM
Fluoride in water Is Harmful? :eek:
"Incredibly, the federal government is finally admitting that high levels of fluoride in our drinking water can be harmful. In fact, the feds have reduced the “recommended amount” of fluoride in our drinking water for the first time in 50 years.

We probably won’t see them ban fluoride any time soon, but for them to even acknowledge a problem with fluoride is a major step. In a recent article on CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/07/fluoride.recommendations/?hpt=T2), it was reported that the federal government is now saying that high levels of fluoride in the water have now officially been linked with fluorosis…."

The Department of Health and Human Services and Environmental Protection Agency are proposing the change because of an increase in fluorosis — a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children’s teeth."








John Colquhoun, DDS, Principal Dental Officer for Auckland, New Zealand and chair of that country’s Fluoridation Promotion Committee, reviewed New Zealand’s dental statistics in an effort to convince skeptics that fluoridation was beneficial and found that tooth decay rates were the same in fluoridated and nonfluoridated places, which prompted him to re-examine the classic fluoridation studies. He withdrew his support for it in “Why I Changed my Mind About Water Fluoridation (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9394474)” (Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1997;41:29—44).



Richard G. Foulkes, MD, a health care administrator and former assistant professor in the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology at the University of British Columbia also switched from pro to anti-water fluoridation (http://archives.cbc.ca/programs/481-1844/page/1/) after studying the issue.



And Dr. Hardy Limeback PhD, DDS – one of the 12 scientists who served on the 2006 National Academy of Sciences review of fluoride (http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11571&page=1), and Head of Preventive Dentistry at University of Toronto – wrote “Why I am Now Officially Opposed to Adding Fluoride to Drinking Water (http://www.fluoridealert.org/limeback.htm)”

As Time Magazine notes (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1118379-1,00.html):
What has also changed is how much toxicologists know about the harmful effects of fluoride compounds. Ingested in high doses, fluoride is indisputably toxic; it was once commonly used in rat poison. Hydrogen fluoride is regulated as a hazardous pollutant in emissions from chemical plants and has been linked to respiratory illness. Even in toothpaste, sodium fluoride is a health concern. In 1997 the Food and Drug Administration toughened the warning on every tube to read, “If more than used for brushing is accidentally swallowed, get medical help or contact a poison-control center right away.”







HARVARD school of public health
http://web.archive.org/web/20120204075814im_/http://www.fluoridealert.org/CMSTemplates/FAN/images/health/teeth/caries/who-dmft.gif

July 25, 2012 — For years health experts have been unable to agree on whether fluoride in the drinking water may be toxic to the developing human brain. Extremely high levels of fluoride are known to cause neurotoxicity in adults, and negative impacts on memory and learning have been reported in rodent studies, but little is known about the substance’s impact on children’s neurodevelopment. In a meta-analysis, researchers from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and China Medical University in Shenyang for the first time combined 27 studies and found strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children. Based on the findings, the authors say that this risk should not be ignored, and that more research on fluoride’s impact on the developing brain is warranted.

The study (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/2012/10/developmental-fluoride-neurotoxicity-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/) (also available at this link (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491930/)) was published online in Environmental Health Perspectives on July 20, 2012.
The researchers conducted a systematic review of studies, almost all of which are from China where risks from fluoride are well-established. Fluoride is a naturally occurring substance in groundwater, and exposures to the chemical are increased in some parts of China. Virtually no human studies in this field have been conducted in the U.S., said lead author Anna Choi (http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/anna-choi), research scientist in the Department of Environmental Health at HSPH.....



our precious bodily fluids?

Voted4Reagan
07-16-2013, 10:24 AM
http://youtu.be/N1KvgtEnABY