PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton attacks Voting Rights ruling



Jeff
08-14-2013, 08:10 AM
OK so we know Hillary wants to be able to get 120% of the vote in counties like her buddy Obama did , but when Obama is all for having to show a I.D. in Kenya to vote and now we must show I.D. to buy certain meds including ( I just seen this morning nail polish ) why not show I.D. to vote , simple dead people don't have I.D. or ya can't use the dead guys I.D. twice

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stood for protecting voting rights Monday afternoon at a speech in San Francisco, slamming the Supreme Court for the “damage” it caused at a local level with its landmark decision on the Voting Rights Act.
“By invalidating pre-clearance, the Supreme Court has shifted the burden back onto citizens alleging discrimination,” Clinton said in a speech to the American Bar Association which was honoring her.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/hillary-clinton-attacks-vra-ruling-95461.html#ixzz2bwsbYMKN

Gaffer
08-14-2013, 10:23 AM
Vote ID makes the fraud level go down. Dead people, illegals, fictional characters will no longer be casting votes. And if this causes a huge drop in dem votes (which it will) then it's just more proof of all the dem fraud that has gone on for years.

Larrymc
08-14-2013, 10:23 AM
OK so we know Hillary wants to be able to get 120% of the vote in counties like her buddy Obama did , but when Obama is all for having to show a I.D. in Kenya to vote and now we must show I.D. to buy certain meds including ( I just seen this morning nail polish ) why not show I.D. to vote , simple dead people don't have I.D. or ya can't use the dead guys I.D. twice

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stood for protecting voting rights Monday afternoon at a speech in San Francisco, slamming the Supreme Court for the “damage” it caused at a local level with its landmark decision on the Voting Rights Act.
“By invalidating pre-clearance, the Supreme Court has shifted the burden back onto citizens alleging discrimination,” Clinton said in a speech to the American Bar Association which was honoring her.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/hillary-clinton-attacks-vra-ruling-95461.html#ixzz2bwsbYMKN

Blah Blah Blah Its just Hillary trying to insure she can have as many votes by fraud as Obama did.

Thunderknuckles
08-14-2013, 10:32 AM
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stood for protecting voting rights Monday afternoon at a speech in San Francisco, slamming the Supreme Court for the “damage” it caused at a local level with its landmark decision on the Voting Rights Act.
“By invalidating pre-clearance, the Supreme Court has shifted the burden back onto citizens alleging discrimination,” Clinton said in a speech to the American Bar Association which was honoring her.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/hillary-clinton-attacks-vra-ruling-95461.html#ixzz2bwsbYMKN


I'm all for the pre-clearance clause of the Voting Rights Act. I stand with Hillary in support of it. :)
I look forward to the day when we get a Republican in office who will appoint an Attorney General who will approve voter ID change requests!
You can bet dollars to donuts that Hillary will be denounce pre-clearance once that happens :laugh:

truthmatters
08-14-2013, 06:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglwthis) this is the founder of the heritage foundation