PDA

View Full Version : BREAKING: FDA to ban trans-fats



Little-Acorn
11-07-2013, 02:00 PM
You, the American citizen, have just been ruled incapable of making the right decisions on what to cook and what to eat.

The government will now make those decisions for you. For your own good.

Why the government is more qualified than you are, has not been explained.

As the article describes, if there's something you want to put in your food, you'll have to petition the government for permission. The article notes that such petition will likely not be approved.

Move along.

----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/23906468/2013/11/07/fda-to-ban-artery-clogging-trans-fats

FDA to ban artery-clogging trans fats

Posted: Nov 07, 2013 9:45 AM PST
Updated: Nov 07, 2013 9:48 AM PST

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S., Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it will require the food industry to gradually phase out artificial trans fats, saying they are a threat to Americans' health. Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said the move could prevent 20,000 heart attacks and 7,000 deaths each year.

Hamburg said that while the amount of trans fats in the country's diet has declined dramatically in the last decade, they "remain an area of significant public health concern." The trans fats have long been criticized by nutritionists, and New York City and other local governments have banned them.

Though they have been removed from many items, the fats are still found in processed foods, including in some microwave popcorns and frozen pizzas, refrigerated doughs, cookies, biscuits and ready-to-use frostings. They are also sometimes used by restaurants that use the fats for frying. Many larger chains have phased them out, but smaller restaurants may still get food containing trans fats from suppliers.

To phase them out, the FDA said it had made a preliminary determination that trans fats no longer fall in the agency's "generally recognized as safe" category, which is reserved for thousands of additives that manufacturers can add to foods without FDA review. Once trans fats are off the list, anyone who wants to use them would have to petition the agency for a regulation allowing it, and that would likely not be approved.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)

Arbo
11-07-2013, 11:08 PM
Slippery slope to total control of our lives…

gabosaurus
11-08-2013, 12:41 AM
So you are against the government wanting to regulate additives known to cause cancer and heart attacks? Intriguing...

Arbo
11-08-2013, 01:12 AM
So you are against the government wanting to regulate additives known to cause cancer and heart attacks? Intriguing...

Can you point out where in the Constitution the federal government is granted such power?

It is about freedom and personal responsibility, this is just yet another 'we will tell you want you can do' slippery slope. What's next? 'Organic' foods? You know they quite often contain more carcinogens than other options, right?

Nukeman
11-08-2013, 07:13 AM
So you are against the government wanting to regulate additives known to cause cancer and heart attacks? Intriguing...
The big issue with this type of proclamation is that where does it stop. You know there is NO reason for skydiving!! Its a dangerous "sport" so it should be banned, not only will it save lives but it will cut down on greenhouse gasses from the use of small airplanes. We could also ban water skiing as well for the same reason.

I would also mention to you the whole "SMOKING" thing, we KNOW those cause cancer/COPD/CAD and a slew of other respiratory issues, yet good old Uncle Sam leaves those alone due to the cash cow known as taxes on that...

It is funny how they pick and choose what is "good for the average person". It is a VERY slippery slope Gabs, what happens when they come after something YOU like???:poke:

CSM
11-08-2013, 07:19 AM
The big issue with this type of proclamation is that where does it stop. You know there is NO reason for skydiving!! Its a dangerous "sport" so it should be banned, not only will it save lives but it will cut down on greenhouse gasses from the use of small airplanes. We could also ban water skiing as well for the same reason.

I would also mention to you the whole "SMOKING" thing, we KNOW those cause cancer/COPD/CAD and a slew of other respiratory issues, yet good old Uncle Sam leaves those alone due to the cash cow known as taxes on that...

It is funny how they pick and choose what is "good for the average person". It is a VERY slippery slope Gabs, what happens when they come after something YOU like???:poke:

Actually it fits right in with lib philosophy ... having babies is dangerous and expensive so ban them! ... oh wait, if we do that, eventually we will run out of taxpayers .... hmmm ....

red states rule
11-09-2013, 03:56 AM
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/payn_c11349220131109120100.jpg