PDA

View Full Version : UN Troops Told To Kill Americans That Don’t Give Over Their Guns



Jeff
11-29-2013, 09:08 AM
Very interesting video to say the least.




New information has come to light as Obama continues his unconstitutional drive toward stricter gun control. We all remember how after the tragedy at Sandy Hook quite the uproar was heard throughout the country and whether stricter gun laws would help. This was met with strong opposition, and immediately shut down the government’s attempts of hindering the second amendment.
Unfortunately one state was able to infringe on these freedoms when the NY SAFE Act was signed into law.
After Obama was silenced on the issue, he took the only other way he knew how. Instead of going through our country’s court, he is attempting to pass a law through the World’s Court – the UN.



http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/11/28002-un-troops-told-to-kill-americans-that-dont-give-over-their-guns/

Little-Acorn
11-29-2013, 12:03 PM
Complete U.N. disarmament document can be found at:

http://www.un.org/disarmament/HomePage/ODAPublications/AdhocPublications/PDF/guide.pdf

Dated 2009, not 1961 as described in the article. Different document?

What seems to be a reprint (modern fonts etc.) of the original 1961 document is pointed to by this U.S. Senate website:
http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_index_subjects/Publications_vrd.htm

Scroll down to "Selected Documents".

And the document's URL the Senate website gives you is:
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

aboutime
11-29-2013, 06:14 PM
Just for future reference to any, and all Americans who may be concerned about the arrival of, or posting of U.N. Troops, anywhere in OUR NATION.

U.N. Troops DO NOT have any authority here. NONE, NATA, ZILCH, ZIPPO.

Any foreign troops who appear on our streets who are armed in any way are ENEMY troops to American citizens. And the 2ND AMENDMENT will, and should be used to it's fullest EXTENT.

revelarts
11-29-2013, 07:10 PM
Just for future reference to any, and all Americans who may be concerned about the arrival of, or posting of U.N. Troops, anywhere in OUR NATION.

U.N. Troops DO NOT have any authority here. NONE, NATA, ZILCH, ZIPPO.
executive orders can change that overnight. it's already on the books that the pres can do what he wants if he says it's a national "emergency". our "nato friends" and UN "Peace" keepers are here to help.


Any foreign troops who appear on our streets who are armed in any way are ENEMY troops to American citizens. And the 2ND AMENDMENT will, and should be used to it's fullest EXTENT.
They'll be named "insurgents", "terrorist", dangerous unauthorized militia groups and criminals.

U.S. troops took peoples guns in New Orleans and surroundings, why would NATO or UN troops hesitate to do the same or worse.


But As i've said before i doubt they'll need to draw a gun to keep people in check. we've already laid down for most of what they want to do to us anyway.
what good is keeping your gun if they've taken privacy, listen to you phones, watch you at home, track your vehicles, take your pension money in the stock market, take your home, and put you in jail for having a yard chicken and not letting your kids be vaccinated according to gov't mandates.
not to mention they could just drone strike troubla makers . ( collateral damage done to children, neighbors or friends nearby is just to bad, they shouldn't have associated with the trouble makers gov't scoff laws)

I wonder if they made a law saying that every 3rd person on every block had to go to a training camp 'to keep us safe' and or 'to get the economy back on track' how many would be upset at those that didn't get on buses to go peacefully.

"it's the law" can't have people breaking the law willy nilly what kinda country would that be? They should vote from the camps to change the law. not give the police any trouble on the buses.

tailfins
11-29-2013, 08:32 PM
Living under the authority of Chief Rotten Mango of the Tupi in the Amazon jungle sounds better all the time.

aboutime
11-30-2013, 08:04 PM
executive orders can change that overnight. it's already on the books that the pres can do what he wants if he says it's a national "emergency". our "nato friends" and UN "Peace" keepers are here to help.

They'll be named "insurgents", "terrorist", dangerous unauthorized militia groups and criminals.

U.S. troops took peoples guns in New Orleans and surroundings, why would NATO or UN troops hesitate to do the same or worse.


But As i've said before i doubt they'll need to draw a gun to keep people in check. we've already laid down for most of what they want to do to us anyway.
what good is keeping your gun if they've taken privacy, listen to you phones, watch you at home, track your vehicles, take your pension money in the stock market, take your home, and put you in jail for having a yard chicken and not letting your kids be vaccinated according to gov't mandates.
not to mention they could just drone strike troubla makers . ( collateral damage done to children, neighbors or friends nearby is just to bad, they shouldn't have associated with the trouble makers gov't scoff laws)

I wonder if they made a law saying that every 3rd person on every block had to go to a training camp 'to keep us safe' and or 'to get the economy back on track' how many would be upset at those that didn't get on buses to go peacefully.

"it's the law" can't have people breaking the law willy nilly what kinda country would that be? They should vote from the camps to change the law. not give the police any trouble on the buses.


Gotta disagree with you again rev. NO EXECUTIVE ORDER from the idiot in the White House supercedes, or overrules the CONSTITUTION.
No president has the power to IGNORE, or ABUSE the U.S. Constitution with any document called an Executive Order. He, or She, would be breaking the law, and disobeying his/her Oath of office.

revelarts
12-01-2013, 08:02 AM
Gotta disagree with you again rev. NO EXECUTIVE ORDER from the idiot in the White House supercedes, or overrules the CONSTITUTION.
No president has the power to IGNORE, or ABUSE the U.S. Constitution with any document called an Executive Order. He, or She, would be breaking the law, and disobeying his/her Oath of office.

In principal you are exactly right AT, i could not agree more. However in practice this is not the case.
For some time now I've pointed out the criminal abuses of oath of various presidents who have based their unconstitutional commands on executive orders, congressional laws, cabinet dept regulations, and even memos from administration and DOJ lawyers. (Not to mention so-called permission from NATO or the U.N.)
That's where we are.
When the president thinks it's a courtesy to allow the congress to comment on whether or not the U.S. starts wars with other countries. And many people think it's OK because 'other presidents have done it' we are not even on the same planet as the constitution.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
12-02-2013, 07:25 PM
Who in their right mind expects anything but treason from the bastrrd!???? last chance to buy your guns and ammo before 2014 is ended because I predict Obama pulls the trigger and starts gun confiscation before 2015. --Tyr