PDA

View Full Version : Rise of the Warrior Cop



Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
01-21-2014, 11:16 AM
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323848804578608040780519904?mod=WS J_hpp_LEFTTopStories&mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB1000 1424127887323848804578608040780519904.html%3Fmod%3 DWSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories Rise of the Warrior Cop

Is it time to reconsider the militarization of American policing?

The acronym SWAT stands for Special Weapons and Tactics. Such police units are trained in methods similar to those used by the special forces in the military. They learn to break into homes with battering rams and to use incendiary devices called flashbang grenades, which are designed to blind and deafen anyone nearby. Their usual aim is to "clear" a building—that is, to remove any threats and distractions (including pets) and to subdue the occupants as quickly as possible.

Today the U.S. has thousands of SWAT teams. A team prepares to enter a house in Vallejo, Calif., on March 20, above. Daily Republic/Associated Press

The country's first official SWAT team started in the late 1960s in Los Angeles. By 1975, there were approximately 500 such units. Today, there are thousands. According to surveys conducted by the criminologist Peter Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University, just 13% of towns between 25,000 and 50,000 people had a SWAT team in 1983. By 2005, the figure was up to 80%.

The number of raids conducted by SWAT-like police units has grown accordingly. In the 1970s, there were just a few hundred a year; by the early 1980s, there were some 3,000 a year. In 2005 (the last year for which Dr. Kraska collected data), there were approximately 50,000 raids. Some federal agencies also now have their own SWAT teams, including NASA and the Department of the Interior.

Americans have long been wary of using the military for domestic policing. Concerns about potential abuse date back to the creation of the Constitution, when the founders worried about standing armies and the intimidation of the people at large by an overzealous executive, who might choose to follow the unhappy precedents set by Europe's emperors and monarchs.

The idea for the first SWAT team in Los Angeles arose during the domestic strife and civil unrest of the mid-1960s. Daryl Gates, then an inspector with the Los Angeles Police Department, had grown frustrated with his department's inability to respond effectively to incidents like the 1965 Watts riots. So his thoughts turned to the military. He was drawn in particular to Marine Special Forces and began to envision an elite group of police officers who could respond in a similar manner to dangerous domestic disturbances.

Mr. Gates initially had difficulty getting his idea accepted. Los Angeles Police Chief William Parker thought the concept risked a breach in the divide between the military and law enforcement. But with the arrival of a new chief, Thomas Reddin, in 1966, Mr. Gates got the green light to start training a unit. By 1969, his SWAT team was ready for its maiden raid against a holdout cell of the Black Panthers.

At about the same time, President Richard Nixon was declaring war on drugs. Among the new, tough-minded law-enforcement measures included in this campaign was the no-knock raid—a policy that allowed drug cops to break into homes without the traditional knock and announcement. After fierce debate, Congress passed a bill authorizing no-knock raids for federal narcotics agents in 1970.

Over the next several years, stories emerged of federal agents breaking down the doors of private homes (often without a warrant) and terrorizing innocent citizens and families. Congress repealed the no-knock law in 1974, but the policy would soon make a comeback (without congressional authorization). It is long past time to consider and take action against the militarization of the police forces in this nation! All this military hardware being given to these police forces are a part of the conversion the feds are going doing IMHO. And the bam-bastard lead the way ...That should scare the hell out of all you people but doesn't because his image has been carefully crafted to dispel the acceptance of who and what he truly is. -Tyr

gabosaurus
01-21-2014, 11:29 AM
Tyr, you are completely in favor of the militarization of the American populace. Why are you against police owning the same type of weaponry?

tailfins
01-21-2014, 01:34 PM
Tyr, you are completely in favor of the militarization of the American populace. Why are you against police owning the same type of weaponry?

Only a dim bulb like you would ask such a question. It's obvious to the answer to that question is: The rules of engagement are different. When is the last time anyone saw an armed law abiding civilian break down someone else's door?

fj1200
01-21-2014, 01:57 PM
By 2005, the figure was up to 80%.

And the bam-bastard lead the way ...

:rolleyes: