PDA

View Full Version : A friend sent me this link.



Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
03-08-2014, 01:05 PM
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/03/07/3376181/sluts-are-just-whores-in-training-and-other-wisdom-offered-by-a-sitting-arkansas-judge/#

‘Sluts Are Just Whores In Training,’ And Other Wisdom Offered By A Sitting Arkansas Judge


By Ian Millhiser on March 7, 2014 at 11:05 am


If you have gay sex, then it is just a “small step” to sex with a dog. “Sluts are just whores in training.” Women shouldn’t make an “emotional decision to divorce because the husband stepped out” if he was a “good provider.” And, whatever you do, don’t go to Disney World during “gay/lesbian week.”

Those are just some of the gems uncovered after the Arkansas blog Blue Hog Report discovered that an pseudonymous commenter on a message board for Louisiana State University fans was sitting Arkansas state Judge Mike Maggio. Judge Maggio, who posted under the username “geauxjudge” offered questionable views on race, sexuality, women and many other issues.

The comment about sex with dogs arose in a discussion thread about a “Vegas woman arrested for sex with pit bull.” Maggio suggested that “TGGLBS sex” — an apparent reference to “transgender, gay, lesbian or bisexual sex” — is a gateway to copulating with canines:

On the subject of race, Maggio appears to rely on racial stereotypes in a question asking whether the word “Indian” refers to Native Americans or South Asians, and he reminisces about attending segregated theaters where he “used to wonder why [African Americans] got the balcony seats.”
Maggio’s most disturbing statement, however, may be a description of something called “Rodeo sex,” which appears to be when man tries to physically force a woman to continue having sex with him after he has said something to her that causes her to withdraw her consent:

Arkansas law defines rape as “sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity with another person . . . [b]y forcible compulsion.” A friend sent me this link. I had to laugh at how upset they people commenting on that site were. Seems they also opposed his freedom of speech to present his views. I guess only pre approved views are to have freedom of speech rights! Of course those commenting are libs/dems and other assorted fools. Click the link to read how they truly view freedom of speech .... -Tyr

WiccanLiberal
03-08-2014, 03:40 PM
Freedom of speech he may have. But if these statements represent his true opinions, they are misogynistic, bigoted and backward. As such, I would question his fitness for the bench. A private citizen has a perfect right to express themselves in any way provided it doesn't create a public danger. A person in a place of public trust must assume people will evaluate anything they say as a barometer of his/her fitness for the position.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
03-08-2014, 03:58 PM
Freedom of speech he may have. But if these statements represent his true opinions, they are misogynistic, bigoted and backward. As such, I would question his fitness for the bench. A private citizen has a perfect right to express themselves in any way provided it doesn't create a public danger. A person in a place of public trust must assume people will evaluate anything they say as a barometer of his/her fitness for the position. Sure they have the right to not agree with his views but they have no right suggesting a baseball bat be rammed up his anal cavity and other assorted suggestions of violence be executed upon him. Nor present his views as being the norm for Republicans/Conservatives etc. He has the right to express his views regardless of how tasteless they may be to others. That is freedom of speech as you well know my friend. As to how much it should be allowed to effect whether his qualifications for being a judge are to be considered I am willing to go along with only if and when all those quacky/quirky socialist , liberal judges undergo the same scrutiny and punitive actions .. Myself, I am tired of seeing a rigid set of standards applied to the right while its pretty much anything goes applied when its leftist/libs and/or dems . Going to shoot one dog for killing chickens had better shoot the other one too or else its a damn folly compounded by hypocrisy and ignorance. And we all see the double standard applied religiously by the left , it's politicians and media propaganda arm. --Tyr