PDA

View Full Version : Iraq says 'terrorists' seize chemical weapons site



Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
07-08-2014, 10:36 PM
I
raq says 'terrorists' seize chemical weapons site


http://news.yahoo.com/iraq-says-terrorists-seize-chemical-weapons-214329015.html
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Iraq said the Islamic State extremist group has taken control of a vast former chemical weapons facility northwest of Baghdad, where 2,500 chemical rockets filled with the deadly nerve agent sarin or their remnants were stored along with other chemical warfare agents.

Iraq's U.N. Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim said in a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in a letter circulated Tuesday that "armed terrorist groups" entered the Muthanna site on June 11, detained officers and soldiers from the protection force guarding the facilities and seized their weapons. The following morning the project manager spotted the looting of some equipment through the camera surveillance system before the "terrorists" disabled it, he said.

The Islamic State group, which controls parts of Syria, sent its fighters into neighboring Iraq last month and quickly captured a vast stretch of territory straddling the border between the two countries. Last week, its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, declared the establishment of an Islamic state, or caliphate, in the land the extremists control.

Alhakim said as a result of the takeover of Muthanna, Iraq is unable "to fulfil its obligations to destroy chemical weapons" because of the deteriorating security situation. He said it would resume its obligations "as soon as the security situation has improved and control of the facility has been regained."

Alhakim singled out the capture of bunkers 13 and 41 in the sprawling complex 35 miles (56 kilometers) northwest of Baghdad in the notorious "Sunni Triangle."

The last major report by U.N. inspectors on the status of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program was released about a year after the experts left in March 2003. It states that Bunker 13 contained 2,500 sarin-filled 122-mm chemical rockets produced and filled before 1991, and about 180 tons of sodium cyanide, "a very toxic chemical and a precursor for the warfare agent tabun."

The U.N. said the bunker was bombed during the first Gulf War in February 1991, which routed Iraq from Kuwait, and the rockets were "partially destroyed or damaged."

It said the sarin munitions were "of poor quality" and "would largely be degraded after years of storage under the conditions existing there." It said the tabun-filled containers were all treated with decontamination solution and likely no longer contain any agent, but "the residue of this decontamination would contain cyanides, which would still be a hazard."

According to the report, Bunker 41 contained 2,000 empty 155-mm artillery shells contaminated with the chemical warfare agent mustard, 605 one-ton mustard containers with residues, and heavily contaminated construction material. It said the shells could contain mustard residues which can't be used for chemical warfare but "remain highly toxic."

And who thinks they wouldn't try to downplay how bad this is!!!
This is likely to be used here and Israel. Actually would be far more easy to use here on us since bam bastard makes our borders non-existent!!! I hope if used(God forbid) in our nation that Washington D.C . is the first target..
And the godlike messiah is there when it happens. -Tyr

red state
07-09-2014, 12:21 AM
I

And who thinks they wouldn't try to downplay how bad this is!!!
This is likely to be used here and Israel. Actually would be far more easy to use here on us since bam bastard makes our borders non-existent!!! I hope if used(God forbid) in our nation that Washington D.C . is the first target..
And the godlike messiah is there when it happens. -Tyr


Agreed, TYR.....it would be poetic justice if our non-leadership would fall first but, instead, they are allowing the disease to eat away at the innocent at and around our borders and into our very core. I am absolutely shocked that we have not had an attack of some kind due to the weak or non-existent border. After finding many prayer rubs in the TX and AZ deserts, it is a wonder several 100 haven't crossed our border and systematically targeted surrounding towns, cities and States by climbing the water source and delivering a deadly contaminant into our water towers. That would go un-noticed till the effects had already taken place on the victims. Another good reason to live off the grid or (at least) hire a well digging crew.

Back to the thread....it is sad that we have supported/funded the very bunch who would love to do us very much harm (and probably will).

darin
07-09-2014, 05:42 AM
'dead' chemical weapons are less of a threat than open borders.

red state
07-09-2014, 06:11 AM
And a president can be more dangerous to a Nation than some of the vilest of terrorists.

Some say that border invaders haven't hurt them any but I would say to that: Neither did any terrorist harm Southerners (except for the "WORK PLACE VIOLENCE" that happened in Fort Hood).

This president IS my enemy and has been (IS) the greatest threat that many Americans have ever faced. Many of us will NEVER see an actual terrorist but B.O. terrorizes and destroys us ALL.

red state
07-09-2014, 06:17 AM
I

And who thinks they wouldn't try to downplay how bad this is!!!
This is likely to be used here and Israel. Actually would be far more easy to use here on us since bam bastard makes our borders non-existent!!! I hope if used(God forbid) in our nation that Washington D.C . is the first target..
And the godlike messiah is there when it happens. -Tyr

TYR, you got your answer yet as to whom would downplay this?

There's no need for anyone to down play what (the terrorist n Chief) is doing just as there is no excuse for anyone to downplay the possibilities of how threatening this group (supported by the terrorist n Chief in OUR White House) can be and/or how these weapons can (WILL) be used against the innocent. I don't downplay any of today's events and neither should the leftist scum.