PDA

View Full Version : Woman Who Really Hates Mexican Flag Loses Her Job Over Hatred Of Mexican Flag



Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-28-2014, 07:17 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/woman-really-hates-mexican-flag-loses-her-job-192023119.html


Woman Who Really Hates Mexican Flag Loses Her Job Over Hatred Of Mexican Flag

.

The Daily Caller

September 27, 2014 3:20 PM


A Southern California woman is out of a job and facing death threats after she used her cell phone to videotape an encounter with a homeowner over a Mexican flag flying in the homeowner’s front yard — and published the video on YouTube.

The woman, Tressy Capps, a political activist and a city council candidate in a town amid the Inland Empire’s endless suburbia, placed the video on YouTube on Aug. 11, 2014.

“Hello? Hi. Is that a Mexican flag in your front yard,” Capps asks, pleasantly enough, in the video.

The woman to whom she is speaking, Maria Banuelos, is standing behind a window. Banuelos doesn’t respond because she doesn’t speak English, reports CBS Los Angeles.

Undaunted, Capps continues.

“You know we live in America right?” Capps then says. “This is the United States. So, why are you flying a Mexican flag in your front yard?”

She then suggests that the woman behind the window “move to Mexico if you want to fly your Mexican flag.”

“Does that make sense?”

Capps also maintains in the video that the homeowners could face municipal fines for flying a Mexican flag in the United States. However, an attorney for Ontario, Calif. has since strenuously denied that assertion.

Banuelos’s husband, Sigifredo Banuelos, who does speak some English, said the homeowners fly the flag to celebrate their Mexican heritage. They also have an American flag, he noted.

“I don’t think it’s offensive because this flag doesn’t do anything,” he told CBS Los Angeles.

Obviously, the flag bothered Capps.

“I was offended,” she told the station. “I was pretty upset. But I couldn’t understand her.”

The YouTube video has become something of a viral sensation. It was been viewed over 165,000 times as of Friday night.

The results of the viral video have been highly adverse for Capps. Her employer, real estate giant Coldwell Banker, has sacked her.

“We do not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” Coldwell Banker spokesman David Siroty said in a statement obtained by Fox News Latino. “We hold our affiliated companies to high ethical standards. Each of our franchised companies is independently owned and operated and we fully support the local owner’s decision to disassociate this independent agent from the brokerage firm and, by extension, our franchise system.”

And then there are the death threats. “My life is being threatened and the business I built for 30 years has suffered over a flag video,” Capps wrote in a Facebook post. “My son is being bullied at school now and for that I am devastated.”

“[T]aking a position on an issue does not make me evil, racist or unethical if I disagree with your position,” she also wrote, according to Fox Latino.

Capps has since apologized for the incident, but the homeowners say they skeptical of her sincerity.

Here is the going plan. Whites are to be ruled by the new power of black and tan..
Its fine and heralded when any of those two groups bitch, gripe and publicly protest but IF A WHITE DOES IT THERE WILL BE PUNISHMENTS.
That's where this nation and the Feds are at.. A sad reality.. PC shit taken to extremes. Always thank a lib/dem/socialist for that .
And lets just hope we can do it in person in a certain way soon. I do....-Tyr

fj1200
09-28-2014, 10:45 PM
Unfortunately for her, being dumb is not a protected class when it comes to job discrimination.

Born2DecadesLate
09-28-2014, 10:58 PM
Here's an idea, mind yoru own fucking business.

If I want to fly a Mexican flag, a Columbia flag, a Christian flag, An American flag, a NAZI flag, a Confederate flag, a gay pride flag. Whatever, on MY property tough shit for you.

I hate that this woman claims to be a conservative becuase usually it is only liberals being this big a sensitive pussy.

SassyLady
09-29-2014, 12:12 AM
I'm going to be contrarian ... I don't like seeing any other flag. I love the American flag (I have 40' in my back yard) and feel that if you want to live in America then you should be proud our your new citizenship (if you are, in fact, a citizen). I just would not post a video of it.http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6397&stc=1

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6398&stc=1

DragonStryk72
09-29-2014, 03:27 AM
Here is the going plan. Whites are to be ruled by the new power of black and tan..
Its fine and heralded when any of those two groups bitch, gripe and publicly protest but IF A WHITE DOES IT THERE WILL BE PUNISHMENTS.
That's where this nation and the Feds are at.. A sad reality.. PC shit taken to extremes. Always thank a lib/dem/socialist for that .
And lets just hope we can do it in person in a certain way soon. I do....-Tyr

It's not really just the dems on this, though. I mean, seriously, I even run into libertarians, republicans, and others who hit the PC tree, and every branch on the way down. I mean, shit, even Bill Maher is getting sick of the shit and he IS a liberal, and he's basically a liberal icon. He actually slammed liberals recently who keep getting enraged at things like this, but when things like honor killings, genital mutilation, and other atrocities happen, they suddenly drop silent.

I think even if it had been a black woman doing it, it still would've played out about the same, and it's just plain stupid. Yeah, okay, the woman's an ass for making a youtube video of dressing down folks for expressing their love for their country of ancestry (Anybody with, say, an Irish flag? Maybe a German one?). I've seen plenty of Greek neighborhoods with the Greece flag flying proudly (Admittedly, I look for this... you get the best gyros there.). Putting up a flag for your ancestry isn't anti-american. Hell, aside from the Native Americans, we're all descended of other countries. Being proud of that ancestry is not a crime, nor should it be shamed.

However, losing you job for your private time youtube video is just fucking stupid, and helps to crush not only the Right to Privacy, but the Right of Free Speech. The whole point of the first amendment is to establish that we should not be under constant worry of saying the wrong thing, lest we be struck down by the authority, whether it be a company or the government.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-29-2014, 06:35 AM
It's not really just the dems on this, though. I mean, seriously, I even run into libertarians, republicans, and others who hit the PC tree, and every branch on the way down. I mean, shit, even Bill Maher is getting sick of the shit and he IS a liberal, and he's basically a liberal icon. He actually slammed liberals recently who keep getting enraged at things like this, but when things like honor killings, genital mutilation, and other atrocities happen, they suddenly drop silent.

I think even if it had been a black woman doing it, it still would've played out about the same, and it's just plain stupid. Yeah, okay, the woman's an ass for making a youtube video of dressing down folks for expressing their love for their country of ancestry (Anybody with, say, an Irish flag? Maybe a German one?). I've seen plenty of Greek neighborhoods with the Greece flag flying proudly (Admittedly, I look for this... you get the best gyros there.). Putting up a flag for your ancestry isn't anti-american. Hell, aside from the Native Americans, we're all descended of other countries. Being proud of that ancestry is not a crime, nor should it be shamed.

However, losing you job for your private time youtube video is just fucking stupid, and helps to crush not only the Right to Privacy, but the Right of Free Speech. The whole point of the first amendment is to establish that we should not be under constant worry of saying the wrong thing, lest we be struck down by the authority, whether it be a company or the government.
The punishment was my main gripe. This PC crap has taken on a whole new dimension now with harsh punishments be set and very freely given.
I don't do u-tube, twitter and only very, very rarely post on Facebook. When I do its pretty generic stuff. My wife signed me up on Facebook about 7 years ago. I' ve post there I think 4 times total in 7 years.
And yes, Ive noticed far too many on the right have joined in the insanity. My take on that is ffkkk them too.
I have equal contempt for all gullible, stupid and so easily led people regardless of their political stripe... -Tyr

Jeff
09-29-2014, 06:45 AM
Here's an idea, mind yoru own fucking business.

If I want to fly a Mexican flag, a Columbia flag, a Christian flag, An American flag, a NAZI flag, a Confederate flag, a gay pride flag. Whatever, on MY property tough shit for you.

I hate that this woman claims to be a conservative becuase usually it is only liberals being this big a sensitive pussy.

I agree with you !!!

BUT

Wait 3 months and see all the towns in this country that OUTLAW a Christmas tree, Christmas Lights ect... if we make a set of lights illegal we sure as hell ought not be allowed to fly a flag from another country, just my opinion of course

fj1200
09-29-2014, 08:27 AM
However, losing you job for your private time youtube video is just fucking stupid, and helps to crush not only the Right to Privacy, but the Right of Free Speech. The whole point of the first amendment is to establish that we should not be under constant worry of saying the wrong thing, lest we be struck down by the authority, whether it be a company or the government.

It's not about privacy it's what she did in a very public manner in a very public place when she works for a company where she is (one of) the faces of that type of firm. She still has her 1A rights but she doesn't have the privilege of working for any particular company.

NightTrain
09-29-2014, 09:02 AM
The homeowner flew both an American Flag and a Mexican Flag in his front yard.

It appears that the American Flag is properly elevated higher than the Mexican Flag, so I don't see the issue.

It's his yard and he can do what he wants in his yard, besides that he flew them both properly so this woman trying to bully them was way out of line.

She got what was coming to her.

:gavel:


Had to shamelessly steal that, FJ. I'm not sorry. Not even a little bit.

fj1200
09-29-2014, 09:06 AM
:laugh: Affirmed on appeal. :gavel:

good times, good times...

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 10:13 AM
It's not really just the dems on this, though. I mean, seriously, I even run into libertarians, republicans, and others who hit the PC tree, and every branch on the way down. I mean, shit, even Bill Maher is getting sick of the shit and he IS a liberal, and he's basically a liberal icon. He actually slammed liberals recently who keep getting enraged at things like this, but when things like honor killings, genital mutilation, and other atrocities happen, they suddenly drop silent.

I think even if it had been a black woman doing it, it still would've played out about the same, and it's just plain stupid. Yeah, okay, the woman's an ass for making a youtube video of dressing down folks for expressing their love for their country of ancestry (Anybody with, say, an Irish flag? Maybe a German one?). I've seen plenty of Greek neighborhoods with the Greece flag flying proudly (Admittedly, I look for this... you get the best gyros there.). Putting up a flag for your ancestry isn't anti-american. Hell, aside from the Native Americans, we're all descended of other countries. Being proud of that ancestry is not a crime, nor should it be shamed.

However, losing you job for your private time youtube video is just fucking stupid, and helps to crush not only the Right to Privacy, but the Right of Free Speech. The whole point of the first amendment is to establish that we should not be under constant worry of saying the wrong thing, lest we be struck down by the authority, whether it be a company or the government.


My turn to be a contrarian.

The COTUS does not protect you from your employer. If you work for me , I have the right to fire you for any reason, or no reason at all.

PixieStix
09-29-2014, 12:19 PM
My turn to be a contrarian.

The COTUS does not protect you from your employer. If you work for me , I have the right to fire you for any reason, or no reason at all.

I am sorry. But that is not true any longer. I am sure people get fired for various reasons. But they can by law take the employer to task, most people don't.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 12:37 PM
I am sorry. But that is not true any longer. I am sure people get fired for various reasons. But they can by law take the employer to task, most people don't.

Of course you're right. I should have been clearer in my meaning. The COTUS itself does not prevent employers from violating your rights.

PixieStix
09-29-2014, 12:41 PM
Of course you're right. I should have been clearer in my meaning. The COTUS itself does not prevent employers from violating your rights.

But current PC laws and violate the rights of employers to make their own choices based on their policies. Economic freedom no longer exists in this nation.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 12:51 PM
But current PC laws and violate the rights of employers to make their own choices based on their policies. Economic freedom no longer exists in this nation.

Don't look at me, I'm against ALL anti discrimination laws when it comes to private businesses.

PixieStix
09-29-2014, 01:12 PM
Don't look at me, I'm against ALL anti discrimination laws when it comes to private businesses.I figured as much :salute:

gabosaurus
09-29-2014, 01:16 PM
I believe it is called "freedom of expression." And if one person threatens another, they deserve to lose their job. I have zero sympathy for her.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 01:18 PM
I believe it is called "freedom of expression." And if one person threatens another, they deserve to lose their job. I have zero sympathy for her.

Would you also be okay with an employer who didn't fire her? Just wondering.

Drummond
09-29-2014, 03:55 PM
Chucking in my own view, for what it's worth ...

OK, you could argue that people have the right to display whatever flag they choose to identify with, on their own property. Taken just as a principle in those terms, that's reasonable enough.

BUT ... just how far do you go to tolerate that ?

Imagine a high-immigration neighbourhood, where the households in the area all (or mostly) decide to fly their own country's flags. And this, in a country that rightly feels a national pride in itself. I ask: when does such a right cease to be JUST that, and when does it become a case of political correctness and tolerance turned into an insult ?

How many of those flags is TOO many ? How do you determine a proper figure ?

Countries have a right to their own identities. Citizens of those countries have every right to be in an environment, within their countries, that they properly relate to. So if such a citizen, feeling pride in her own country, feels aggrieved by the incursive intrusion of a FOREIGN flag, isn't it reasonable to speak up against it, WITHOUT incurring a penalty for doing so ?

fj1200
09-29-2014, 03:59 PM
So if such a citizen, feeling pride in her own country, feels aggrieved by the incursive intrusion of a FOREIGN flag, isn't it reasonable to speak up against it, WITHOUT incurring a penalty for doing so ?

She didn't incur any penalty by the State for her view.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 04:58 PM
Chucking in my own view, for what it's worth ...

OK, you could argue that people have the right to display whatever flag they choose to identify with, on their own property. Taken just as a principle in those terms, that's reasonable enough.

BUT ... just how far do you go to tolerate that ?

Imagine a high-immigration neighbourhood, where the households in the area all (or mostly) decide to fly their own country's flags. And this, in a country that rightly feels a national pride in itself. I ask: when does such a right cease to be JUST that, and when does it become a case of political correctness and tolerance turned into an insult ?

How many of those flags is TOO many ? How do you determine a proper figure ?

Countries have a right to their own identities. Citizens of those countries have every right to be in an environment, within their countries, that they properly relate to. So if such a citizen, feeling pride in her own country, feels aggrieved by the incursive intrusion of a FOREIGN flag, isn't it reasonable to speak up against it, WITHOUT incurring a penalty for doing so ?


How many is too many? It's my property, I'll decide that thank you very much.

Unless you want me coming over and telling YOU how many flags or whatever YOU can have.

Some things we may want to do on our property may indeed intrude on the rights of others. I mean I can't have a city dump in my backyard, the neighbors would complain and rightfully so. But having a FLAG does not rise to that level.

As for the penalty the whiny woman received IE being terminated from her job; doesn't an employer have the right to fire a whiny busy body?

DragonStryk72
09-29-2014, 07:37 PM
It's not about privacy it's what she did in a very public manner in a very public place when she works for a company where she is (one of) the faces of that type of firm. She still has her 1A rights but she doesn't have the privilege of working for any particular company.

She was not at work, nor on their property. I'm sorry, but here, the "accepted" law is wrong, an endaround way of ignoring the first 1st and 4th amendments as it suits us. With the increasing spread of technology, we have been ceding more and more of our right to privacy. If she'd said it at a bar, that would've been okay? What about just talking with somebody about it on a street corner? They all public spaces, so why is only the internet now unprotected?

Again, she was an ass, on her own time, which should not carry the penalty of losing her livelihood.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 07:39 PM
She was not at work, nor on their property. I'm sorry, but here, the "accepted" law is wrong, an endaround way of ignoring the first 1st and 4th amendments as it suits us. With the increasing spread of technology, we have been ceding more and more of our right to privacy. If she'd said it at a bar, that would've been okay? What about just talking with somebody about it on a street corner? They all public spaces, so why is only the internet now unprotected?

Again, she was an ass, on her own time, which should not carry the penalty of losing her livelihood.

Shouldn't that be up to whoever is providing her livelehoood?

NightTrain
09-29-2014, 08:41 PM
Chucking in my own view, for what it's worth ...

OK, you could argue that people have the right to display whatever flag they choose to identify with, on their own property. Taken just as a principle in those terms, that's reasonable enough.

BUT ... just how far do you go to tolerate that ?

Imagine a high-immigration neighbourhood, where the households in the area all (or mostly) decide to fly their own country's flags. And this, in a country that rightly feels a national pride in itself. I ask: when does such a right cease to be JUST that, and when does it become a case of political correctness and tolerance turned into an insult ?

How many of those flags is TOO many ? How do you determine a proper figure ?

Countries have a right to their own identities. Citizens of those countries have every right to be in an environment, within their countries, that they properly relate to. So if such a citizen, feeling pride in her own country, feels aggrieved by the incursive intrusion of a FOREIGN flag, isn't it reasonable to speak up against it, WITHOUT incurring a penalty for doing so ?

With this particular case, as I said before, he was flying the American Flag as well in a proper elevation above the Mexican Flag.

It's legal to fly other flags in the USA provided they are flown properly - we have the UN here and all those flags are flown. I believe Embassies also fly their own flags - properly, of course.

He was legal, there wasn't any rule breaking, and it was his own property... I don't see any issue.

It's usually liberals or atheists that try to ram their views down other people's throats, which is why this story got any traction - it was unusual.

That chick was out of line with her maneuver and she paid the price.

Coldwell Banker didn't want to be associated with such a politically charged issue, which is good business sense on their part, and parted ways with the little Crusader. I don't blame them.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 10:12 PM
With this particular case, as I said before, he was flying the American Flag as well in a proper elevation above the Mexican Flag.

It's legal to fly other flags in the USA provided they are flown properly - we have the UN here and all those flags are flown. I believe Embassies also fly their own flags - properly, of course.

He was legal, there wasn't any rule breaking, and it was his own property... I don't see any issue.

It's usually liberals or atheists that try to ram their views down other people's throats, which is why this story got any traction - it was unusual.

That chick was out of line with her maneuver and she paid the price.

Coldwell Banker didn't want to be associated with such a politically charged issue, which is good business sense on their part, and parted ways with the little Crusader. I don't blame them.


In regards to embassies. They fly their flag ONLY, not with a US flag.

One must remember that embassies are property of the country they are in. Same as our embassies are world wide. We don't fly the Union Jack under the Stars and Stripes in London, we fly ONLY our flag. Embassies in the US are not technically on US soil and so flag rules don't apply.

Same with the UN, the UN is not US property.

And there is no law that says that a private citizen must also fly the US flag if they are going to fly a foreign flag.
http://www.united-states-flag.com/displaying-flags.html

Drummond
09-29-2014, 10:40 PM
How many is too many? It's my property, I'll decide that thank you very much.

Unless you want me coming over and telling YOU how many flags or whatever YOU can have.

Some things we may want to do on our property may indeed intrude on the rights of others. I mean I can't have a city dump in my backyard, the neighbors would complain and rightfully so. But having a FLAG does not rise to that level.

As for the penalty the whiny woman received IE being terminated from her job; doesn't an employer have the right to fire a whiny busy body?

I take your point - to a degree - about the right to do what you like on your own private property. But I still think that there's a balance to be struck, between doing what you please and insulting the country you live in.

This wouldn't be too much of an issue, over here in the UK ... and why ? A mixture of political correctness and a lack of patriotic pride diminish its importance to people. BUT ... as I understand it, America is different. American citizens are far less interested in having political correctness expectations shoved down their throats, and besides, national pride still means something to you !

And to NightTrain: it's more usually the case that liberals (Lefties) try to force ultra-tolerance of everyone else's cultures at the expense of the indigenous one. Before you know where you are, 'nationalism' and 'patriotism' are seen to be antisocial traits ...

So anyway, however you exactly argue the rights and wrongs here, I still say that this individual's reaction to the flag was understandable at minimum.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 10:52 PM
I take your point - to a degree - about the right to do what you like on your own private property. But I still think that there's a balance to be struck, between doing what you please and insulting the country you live in.

This wouldn't be too much of an issue, over here in the UK ... and why ? A mixture of political correctness and a lack of patriotic pride diminish its importance to people. BUT ... as I understand it, America is different. American citizens are far less interested in having political correctness expectations shoved down their throats, and besides, national pride still means something to you !

And to NightTrain: it's more usually the case that liberals (Lefties) try to force ultra-tolerance of everyone else's cultures at the expense of the indigenous one. Before you know where you are, 'nationalism' and 'patriotism' are seen to be antisocial traits ...

So anyway, however you exactly argue the rights and wrongs here, I still say that this individual's reaction to the flag was understandable at minimum.


US national pride is something that comes and goes as the mood fits. Oh sure after 911 everyone gathered around and chanted USA USA , but overall ? I think the idea that Americans have some sort of national pride is over stated. Americans in general are stupid. And lazy. And yes, PC is everywhere over here. I mean for God's sakes some little bitches are now whining about the Redskins even though before the whining started 97% of native american tribes polled said they were fine with the name.

In fact get this, in Minnesota the state legislature actually spent time changing the name of a fish, the asian carp, I mean come on.

This woman didn't protest the flag out of patriotic verve, she protested it out of ignorance. " I don't like dem Messicans, they stealing all our jobs"

And further, anyone stupid enough not to know that posting dumb shit online can lead to a lost job deserves what they get.

Besides what , other than "hey look at me look at me" did posting that online serve anyway?

NightTrain
09-29-2014, 10:53 PM
In regards to embassies. They fly their flag ONLY, not with a US flag.

One must remember that embassies are property of the country they are in. Same as our embassies are world wide. We don't fly the Union Jack under the Stars and Stripes in London, we fly ONLY our flag. Embassies in the US are not technically on US soil and so flag rules don't apply.

Same with the UN, the UN is not US property.

And there is no law that says that a private citizen must also fly the US flag if they are going to fly a foreign flag.
http://www.united-states-flag.com/displaying-flags.html


Right. That's why I said :


Embassies also fly their own flags - properly, of course.

My point was that there are instances of other flags flown in this country. Legally. Without protest.

I will say here that I'm on the other side emotionally, but right is right. That Mexican has the right to fly that flag, I would feel differently if Old Glory wasn't there right now.

The UN is indeed on U.S. Territory, whether or not it is ceded for the good of the world. I know that it is neutral, but it is ours. If it were truly no-mans-land, it would be in Antarctica.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 11:00 PM
Right. That's why I said :



My point was that there are instances of other flags flown in this country. Legally. Without protest.

I will say here that I'm on the other side emotionally, but right is right. That Mexican has the right to fly that flag, I would feel differently if Old Glory wasn't there right now.

The UN is indeed on U.S. Territory, whether or not it is ceded for the good of the world. I know that it is neutral, but it is ours. If it were truly no-mans-land, it would be in Antarctica.


No, the UN is NOT on US property. Look it up. No property taxes are collected, and no income tax is paid by anyone who is employed there, because it is NOT part of the US. They are extraterrirtorial. Sort of like an Indian reservation actually.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

NightTrain
09-29-2014, 11:17 PM
No, the UN is NOT on US property. Look it up. No property taxes are collected, and no income tax is paid by anyone who is employed there, because it is NOT part of the US. They are extraterrirtorial. Sort of like an Indian reservation actually.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

I think I alluded to that in my post.

I know it's not 'really' US territory, but it is.

Ask anyone where the UN is headquartered, and the answer is?





USA.

Born2DecadesLate
09-29-2014, 11:36 PM
I think I alluded to that in my post.

I know it's not 'really' US territory, but it is.

Ask anyone where the UN is headquartered, and the answer is?





USA.

I don't care how many people answer USA , they ciare still wrong. The UN is NOT part of the US. I mean the Vatican is in Rome, but it is NOT part of Rome either. Same principle.

DragonStryk72
09-30-2014, 12:02 AM
Shouldn't that be up to whoever is providing her livelehoood?

Her does her being an ass outside work where it has no effect on her job performance, have an effect on her job performance?

Ascastlat
09-30-2014, 06:51 AM
It is pretty crazy. I think they have the right to fly the Mexican Flag in front of their house. I thought a few times it would be cool to fly the Israeli flag in front of mine in support of Israel. Some people take things way too far.

jimnyc
09-30-2014, 06:54 AM
It is pretty crazy. I think they have the right to fly the Mexican Flag in front of their house. I thought a few times it would be cool to fly the Israeli flag in front of mine in support of Israel. Some people take things way too far.

Fly that Israeli flag and you risk getting your head lopped off. :beer:

Welcome to DP. :salute:

fj1200
09-30-2014, 08:23 AM
She was not at work, nor on their property. I'm sorry, but here, the "accepted" law is wrong, an endaround way of ignoring the first 1st and 4th amendments as it suits us. With the increasing spread of technology, we have been ceding more and more of our right to privacy. If she'd said it at a bar, that would've been okay? What about just talking with somebody about it on a street corner? They all public spaces, so why is only the internet now unprotected?

Again, she was an ass, on her own time, which should not carry the penalty of losing her livelihood.

Her job is to sell houses; she diminished her abilities in that respect by taking the actions she did. She also took the time to piss off a significant population of her's, and her employer's, possible clients.

And I disagree that due to technology we have been ceding our rights, we've only been eroding our perceived right of "privacy." It's just that our activities are now so easily published and made public by the prevalence of technology. She went even farther and published her own rant. The ramifications could have been the same if she was at a bar or yelling on the street corner, the internet hasn't changed anything except magnified her words. If she said it quietly then I'm sure nothing would have happened because she would not have created the public spectacle that she did.

There is no 1A or 4A violation here. Besides, she harmed her own livelihood whether or not she had been let go. She is likely an independent contractor who has even fewer work rights than an employee.

fj1200
09-30-2014, 08:24 AM
Her does her being an ass outside work where it has no effect on her job performance, have an effect on her job performance?

Her job performance is directly tied to her being able to get listings and/or her ability to her being able to attract potential buyers.

darin
09-30-2014, 08:33 AM
The woman is a tool. She deserves the consequences.

Who. Gives. A. Shit. what flag anyone flies? Hell, if I fly a Seahawks 12th Man Flag, should I be accosted by neighbors telling me I am in MICHIGAN?

:-/

jimnyc
09-30-2014, 08:35 AM
Hell, if I fly a Seahawks 12th Man Flag, should I be accosted by neighbors telling me I am in MICHIGAN?
:-/

Yes, you should be accosted ANYWHERE you would fly that. :)