PDA

View Full Version : Rapists Fret Not, 400,000+ used Rape Kits Never Tested to find Rapist



revelarts
11-01-2014, 11:15 AM
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/400000-rape-kits-untested-police-drugs-tested-time/

Rapists Fret Not, Cops Far More Interested in the Drug War. 400,000 Rape Kits Never Tested
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/400000-rape-kits-untested-police-drugs-tested-time/#94P78k30B2XqWquF.99

man, on it's face this is just HORRIBLY wrong.

Source: Free Thought Project

The police have plenty of money to spend on high tech weapons and gadgets to fight the drug war, but when it comes to actual crimes against people and property, the police look the other way and claim that they don’t have the resources.

Hundreds of thousands of rape kits, dating back decades, have gone untested by police departments across the country, but oddly they seem to have the time and resources to test all of the drugs that they confiscate.

This revelation sheds some light on the way that cases are prioritized in American police departments.

According to the Department of Justice, there are currently over 400,000 untested rape kits collecting dust in police evidence rooms nationwide, and many other estimates suggest that this number could be as high as one million.

As a result of this horrific negligence, roughly 3% of rape cases in America are actually solved, despite the fact that many rape kits have a high chance of leading to an arrest, since most rapists are career criminals who have their DNA on file.

In some cases, the victims even know who their attackers were, but they can not prosecute these criminals because the evidence has not been processed by police.

Bobbie Villareal, Executive Director of the Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center, admitted that many police departments cut corners in rape cases because testing is expensive, and the investigation requires a lot of work.

“It is about $500 to $1000, for each kit to be tested. If it’s not an active case, that cost has to be absorbed by the police department. So that’s a huge amount of money to spend. And if it’s not deemed a case that can have a viable prosecution, [testing] is put on hold. I think financial and manpower — these are investments that are going to have to start over all again. DPD is sending 250 to 300 kits in this first batch, so that’s potentially 250 to 300 cases that will have to start over all again. So that’s a lot of manpower,” Villareal said.

Many rape victims have reported trouble getting officers to pay attention to their case after the report is filed. These are not isolated incidents either, this is a systematic problem that is created by the incentives that exist in monopoly organizations.

In different police departments there have been a variety of class action lawsuits filed by victims and in some places they are attempting to change the laws.

In Memphis, Tennessee, where there are 12,000 untested rape kits, going back to the 1980s, victim Meaghan Ybos has been pushing to raise awareness about this issue and is also attempting to change the laws about how these crimes are handled.

One piece of legislation that was propose in Tennessee would require that law enforcement agencies submit rape kits within 10 days of the incident and actually test them within six months time, but local bureaucrats are fighting back.

Illana Tate, a spokesperson for the Tennessee Bureau of investigation, said that such a law would require a bigger budget.

“If the proposal is passed where TBI has to return kits in six months, we would need to double our manpower and require new buildings to accommodate new hires and equipment,” Tate said.

The police have plenty of money to spend on high tech weapons and gadgets to fight the drug war, but when it comes toactual crimes against people and property, the police look the other way and claim that they don’t have the resources.

jimnyc
11-01-2014, 11:36 AM
I think this goes deeper than just the police departments, although they are just as guilty as everyone else involved. This would also be the state, hospitals, health clinics. Many more are guilty of this, and they are all wrong for various reasons. Here's a small bit to add to your store...

---------

In the United States, rape kit costs, availability, proper implementation of the invasive exam, and backlogs have historically presented problems for victims of rape seeking justice.[8][9][10]

As of May 2009 the federal Violence Against Women Act of 2005 went into effect,[6] requiring state governments who wish to continue receiving federal funding to pay for "Jane Doe rape kits" or "anonymous rape tests". These tests allow victims too traumatized to go to the police to undergo the procedure at hospitals. The hospitals maintain the collected evidence in a sealed envelope identified only by a number, unless police access its contents upon the victim's decision to press charges. While the practice had been recommended by the Federal Bureau of Investigation since at least 1999, and was already followed at some health clinics, colleges and hospitals, and in the state of Massachusetts, many jurisdictions up until then refused to pay the estimated $800 cost of the rape examination without a police report filed by the victim.[11]

In 2011, the National Institute of Justice published a report, “The Road Ahead: Unanalyzed Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases," providing an overview of deep problems nationwide and the contributing factors to ongoing bureaucratic difficulties. These backlogs and delays may lead to a lack of justice for victims, the report notes, and “in worst-case scenarios … lead to additional victimization by serial offenders or the incarceration of people wrongly con*victed of a crime.” Findings include: 1) As an indicator of how widespread this problem has become, “18 percent of unsolved alleged sexual assaults that occurred from 2002 to 2007 contained forensic evidence that was still in police custody (not submitted to a crime lab for analysis)"; 2) One major challenge is that 43% of law enforcement agencies “do not have a computerized system for tracking forensic evidence, either in their inventory or after it is sent to the crime lab"; 3) On average, 50–60% of kits test positive for biological material that does not belong to the victim; 4) Survey responses indicated that there may be some misunderstanding of the value of biological evidence. 44% of the law enforcement agencies said that one of the reasons they did not send evidence to the lab was that a suspect had not been identified. 15% said that they did not submit evidence because “analysis had not been requested by a prosecutor.”[12]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_kit

gabosaurus
11-01-2014, 11:50 AM
Not to mention the fact that the court system has never given the crime of sexual attack the seriousness that it deserves.
The most common strategy taken by defense lawyers in rape cases is to put the victim on trial. Can you imagine this happening in an assault or robbery case?
"You were walking in the wrong neighborhood at the wrong time. How can you not expect to be robbed? Don't you think you were asking for it?"
This is why so many rape victims fail to report crimes. They don't want to be attacked again.
I am all for Sharia Law in sexual assault cases.

jimnyc
11-01-2014, 11:54 AM
Not to mention the fact that the court system has never given the crime of sexual attack the seriousness that it deserves.
The most common strategy taken by defense lawyers in rape cases is to put the victim on trial. Can you imagine this happening in an assault or robbery case?
"You were walking in the wrong neighborhood at the wrong time. How can you not expect to be robbed? Don't you think you were asking for it?"
This is why so many rape victims fail to report crimes. They don't want to be attacked again.
I am all for Sharia Law in sexual assault cases.

I agree with you, but you have to remember - the job of the defense attorney is to protect his client and get him off of any charges. Not stating it's right, but as an attorney, you sit for hours on end trying to come up with the best defense for your client. If that's what sways the judge or jury, that's what he will do.

jimnyc
11-01-2014, 11:57 AM
I am all for Sharia Law in sexual assault cases.

And no, you're not. The woman would likely be found guilty and executed by sundown if she sexually assaulted a man. If a woman accuses a man of sexual assault, and she doesn't have MALE witnesses to the event, she very well can be killed for that as well!!

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sharia+4+male+witnesses+rape