PDA

View Full Version : An Important Win



Kathianne
08-27-2015, 08:01 AM
in education. AP guidelines revised for the better:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hey-conservatives-you-won-1440628311


Hey, Conservatives, You WonThe College Board’s about-face on U.S. history is a significant political event. By DANIEL HENNINGER
<time class="timestamp" style="margin: 0px 0px 4px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; font-family: 'Whitney SSm', sans-serif; display: block; line-height: 2.2rem; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); background: 0px 0px;">Aug. 26, 2015 6:31 p.m. ET

In this summer of agitated discontent for American conservatives, we can report a victory for them, assuming that is still permitted.


Last year, the College Board, the nonprofit corporation that controls all the high-school Advanced Placement courses and exams, published new guidelines for the AP U.S. history test. They read like a left-wing dream. Obsession with identity, gender, class, crimes against the American Indian and the sins of capitalism suffused the proposed guidelines for teachers of AP American history.


As of a few weeks ago, that tilt in the guidelines has vanished. The College Board’s rewritten 2015 teaching guidelines are almost a model of political fair-mindedness. This isn’t just an about-face. It is an important political event.


The earlier guidelines characterized the discovery of America as mostly the story of Europeans bringing pestilence, destructive plants and cultural obliteration to American Indians. The new guidelines put it this way: “Mutual misunderstandings between Europeans and Native Americans often defined the early years of interaction and trade as each group sought to make sense of the other. Over time, Europeans and Native Americans adopted some useful aspects of each other’s culture.”


The previous, neo-Marxist guidelines said, “Students should be able to explain how various identities, cultures, and values have been preserved or changed in different contexts of U.S. history, with special attention given to the formation of gender, class, racial, and ethnic identities.” That has been removed. The revised guidelines have plenty about “identity” but nothing worth mounting a Super PAC to battle.


Also new: “The effort for American independence was energized by colonial leaders such as Benjamin Franklin, as well as by popular movements that included the political activism of laborers, artisans, and women.” The earlier version never suggested the existence of Franklin—or Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton, Madison or anyone resembling a Founding Father. Now they’re back. Even the Federalist Papers were fished out of the memory hole.


Most incredible of all, the private enterprise system is, as they say, reimagined as a force for good: “As the price of many goods decreased, workers’ real wages increased, providing new access to a variety of goods and services.” There’s an idea that has fallen out of favor the past six years.


The final sentence of my June 11 column on the previous guidelines, “Bye, Bye, American History,” (http://www.wsj.com/articles/bye-bye-american-history-1433978690) said: “The College Board promises that what it produces next month will be ‘balanced.’ We await the event.”


The College Board delivered on its promise. The new guidelines, which convey an understanding of American history to thousands of high-school students, are about as balanced as one could hope for. The framework itself, (https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-us-history-course-and-exam-description.pdf) on the College Board website inside the AP tab, is worth a look.


What happened?


To Bernie-Sanders progressives, what happened was a sellout. For ThinkProgress.org, “College Board Caves to Conservative Pressure.”


What really happened was the resurrection of an American idea the left wants to extinguish—federalism. Some states began to push back. Legislative opposition to the guidelines formed in Georgia, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Nebraska, Tennessee, Colorado and Texas.

...
</time>

NightTrain
08-27-2015, 09:24 AM
Amazing.

There must have been more than a few bloody battles fought behind the scenes there. I wonder what prompted the move?

Kathianne
08-27-2015, 06:56 PM
Amazing.

There must have been more than a few bloody battles fought behind the scenes there. I wonder what prompted the move?

Primarily Stanley Kurtz. I've been reading his papers coming out of Ethics and Public Policy Center for awhile now. Basically he accused the College Board of pushing the test, which is for profit, into teaching false history and students were failing. He also brought up teachers who were disgusted with the revisionism, award winning teachers. They explained why they would have to teach what the test wanted, otherwise their students wouldn't get credit. They felt there were problems in saying, "You need to know this for the test, but it's biased, severely biased.

Anyways, if you are interested in some or all, here's the google list to click on:

​https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1CAHPZY_enUS585US585&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=stanley+Kurtz+college+board+ap+history

Abbey Marie
08-27-2015, 08:33 PM
As our Brit friends might say, I'm gob-smacked!

Isn't it so sad and telling how excited we must get over any victory these days?


Thanks for the good news, Kath.

Russ
08-27-2015, 09:36 PM
It is disgraceful that they would try rewriting history as part of their political maneuverings. Reminds me of Goebbels.

It is amazing how liberal-agenda politics wants to eliminate the Founding Fathers from history. Why?

Kathianne
08-27-2015, 09:47 PM
It is disgraceful that they would try rewriting history as part of their political maneuverings. Reminds me of Goebbels.

It is amazing how liberal-agenda politics wants to eliminate the Founding Fathers from history. Why?

If they are taught of the Framers and the philosophy behind the documents, well they just might be willing to let the Constitution work. Horrors!