PDA

View Full Version : Al-Qaida has regained strength, US warns



nevadamedic
07-12-2007, 01:12 PM
WASHINGTON - A new threat assessment from U.S. counterterrorism analysts says that al-Qaida has used its safe haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border to restore its operating capabilities to a level unseen since the months before Sept. 11, 2001.

A counterterrorism official familiar with a five-page summary of the document — titled "Al-Qaida better positioned to strike the West" — called it a stark appraisal. The analysis will be part of a broader meeting at the White House on Thursday about an upcoming National Intelligence Estimate.

The official and others spoke to The Associated Press on condition they not be identified because the report remains classified.

The findings suggests that the network that launched the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil has been able to regroup despite nearly six years of bombings, war and other tactics aimed at dismantling it.

At his news conference Thursday, President Bush acknowledged the report's existence and al-Qaida's continuing threat to the United States. He said, however, that the report refers only to al-Qaida's strength in 2001, not prior to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The group was at its strongest throughout most of that year, with well-established training camps in Afghanistan, recruitment networks and command structures.

Bush used the new threat assessment to show his administration's policies are the right course.

"Because of the actions we've taken, al-Qaida is weaker today than they would have been," he said. "They are still a threat. They are still dangerous. And that is why it is important that we succeed in Afghanistan and Iraq and anywhere else we find them."

The threat assessment focuses on the terror group's safe haven in Pakistan and makes a range of observations about the threat posed to the United States and its allies, officials said.

Counterterrorism officials have been increasingly concerned about al-Qaida's recent operations. This week, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a "gut feeling" that the United States faced a heightened risk of attack this summer.

Still, numerous government officials say they know of no specific, credible threat of a new attack on U.S. soil.

And Chertoff repeated that Thursday during appearances on morning television news shows. But in an interview on NBC's "Today" show, he also said officials believe "we're entering a period" of increased risk.

Asked on ABC's "Good Morning America" to explain al-Qaida's continuing strength nearly six years after the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States, Chertoff said, "It reflects the fact that just as we improve our defenses, the enemy tries to improve its defenses and rebuild itself."

Al-Qaida is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the counterterrorism official said, paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States."

The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001, with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the report as saying.

At the same time, this official said, the report speaks of "significant gaps in intelligence" so U.S. authorities may be ignorant of potential or planned attacks.

John Kringen, who heads the CIA's analysis directorate, echoed the concerns about al-Qaida's resurgence during testimony and conversations with reporters at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday.

"They seem to be fairly well settled into the safe haven and the ungoverned spaces of Pakistan," Kringen testified. "We see more training. We see more money. We see more communications. We see that activity rising."

The threat assessment comes as the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies prepare a National Intelligence Estimate focusing on threats to the United States. A senior intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity while the high-level analysis was being completed, said the document has been in the works for roughly two years.

Kringen and aides to National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell would not comment on the details of that analysis.

"Preparation of the estimate is not a response to any specific threat," McConnell's spokesman Ross Feinstein said, adding that it probably will be ready for distribution this summer.

Kringen said he wouldn't attach a summer time frame to the concern. In studying the threat, he said he begins with the premise that al-Qaida would consider attacking the U.S. a "home run hit" and that the easiest way to get into the United States would be through Europe.

Several European countries — among them Britain, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands — are highlighted in the threat assessment partly because they have arrangements with the Pakistani government that allow their citizens easier access to Pakistan than others, according to the counterterrorism official.

This is more troubling because all four are part of the U.S. visa waiver program, and their citizens can enter the United States without additional security scrutiny, the official said.

The Bush administration has repeatedly cited al-Qaida as a key justification for continuing the fight in Iraq.

"The No. 1 enemy in Iraq is al-Qaida," White House press secretary Tony Snow said Wednesday. "Al-Qaida continues to be the chief organizer of mayhem within Iraq."

The findings could bolster the president's hand at a moment when support on Capitol Hill for the war is eroding and the administration is struggling to defend its decision for a military buildup in Iraq.

The threat assessment says that al-Qaida stepped up efforts to "improve its core operational capability" in late 2004 but did not succeed until December of 2006 after the Pakistani government signed a peace agreement with tribal leaders that effectively removed government military presence from the northwest frontier with Afghanistan.

The agreement allows Taliban and al-Qaida operatives to move across the border with impunity and establish and run training centers, the report says, according to the official.

It also says that al-Qaida is particularly interested in building up the numbers in its middle ranks, or operational positions, so there is not as great a lag in attacks when such people are killed.

"Being No. 3 in al-Qaida is a bad job. We regularly get to the No. 3 person," Tom Fingar, the top U.S. intelligence analyst, told the House panel.

The report also notes that al-Qaida has increased its public statements, although analysts stressed that those video and audio messages aren't reliable indicators of the actions the group may take.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070712/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_terror_threat

This is horrible news. We will be attacked again, probably in the near future. I don't see why we can't bomb these areas that AQ is building up it's forces and training their terrorists at.

Gaffer
07-12-2007, 07:01 PM
Because those camps are located in iran and pakistan. Think we can get the democrat controlled congress to approve going into those countries? You know, invade, start a couple of wars. It would be the logical thing to do, so you know it won't be done.

nevadamedic
07-12-2007, 07:11 PM
Because those camps are located in iran and pakistan. Think we can get the democrat controlled congress to approve going into those countries? You know, invade, start a couple of wars. It would be the logical thing to do, so you know it won't be done.

We wouldn't really need to invade, just drop a shitload of bombs on the AQ base.

Gaffer
07-12-2007, 07:51 PM
We wouldn't really need to invade, just drop a shitload of bombs on the AQ base.

When that base is located in another country its an act of war. Neither pakistan or iran will stand by and let us do that. Neither will the democrats. So al queda will continue to grow and get stronger while we sit back and wait for them to act. It's the pc thing to do.

nevadamedic
07-12-2007, 09:15 PM
When that base is located in another country its an act of war. Neither pakistan or iran will stand by and let us do that. Neither will the democrats. So al queda will continue to grow and get stronger while we sit back and wait for them to act. It's the pc thing to do.

Yea, but we would be taking care of three birds with one stone, AQ, Iran and Pakistan. If we truly want to get rid of terrorism then that's what we would do. Senator Harry Reid and the rest of the Nerd Hurd will ever let that happen. They don't care what happens to our country as long as they can sit in office and get lobbied and bought off.

Psychoblues
07-14-2007, 03:52 AM
And just why is Al Queda getting stronger and just whose fault do you think that is? Don't play your "Democrat" card just yet. We gave the prez all he wanted when he was genuinely concerned with "Al Queda". What was that the prez said a few years ago? "Osama Bin Laden, he is not a major concern" or something to that effect? He lost me and plenty more like me with that treasonous piece of purely political shell game nonsensicle mumbo jumbo.

Dig it?

Dilloduck
07-14-2007, 07:03 AM
And just why is Al Queda getting stronger and just whose fault do you think that is? Don't play your "Democrat" card just yet. We gave the prez all he wanted when he was genuinely concerned with "Al Queda". What was that the prez said a few years ago? "Osama Bin Laden, he is not a major concern" or something to that effect? He lost me and plenty more like me with that treasonous piece of purely political shell game nonsensicle mumbo jumbo.

Dig it?

Al quaeda isn't getting stronger. Dig it ?

nevadamedic
07-14-2007, 07:23 AM
And just why is Al Queda getting stronger and just whose fault do you think that is? Don't play your "Democrat" card just yet. We gave the prez all he wanted when he was genuinely concerned with "Al Queda". What was that the prez said a few years ago? "Osama Bin Laden, he is not a major concern" or something to that effect? He lost me and plenty more like me with that treasonous piece of purely political shell game nonsensicle mumbo jumbo.

Dig it?

Actually President Clinton said AQ wasn't a concern. Get your fact's straight.

glockmail
07-14-2007, 09:13 AM
Actually President Clinton said AQ wasn't a concern. Get your fact's straight. Ouch. That had to hurt.

red states rule
07-25-2007, 06:18 AM
Report: Al-Qaeda Strength Safely Back to Clintonian Levels
Despite the Bush junta's attempts to keep it buried, a recently obtained classified report confirms that Al Qaeda's strength has returned to pre-9/11 levels. Osama Bin Laden is on the loose, the Taliban has retaken control of Afghanistan, and terrorists are poised to strike the West.

In other words, things are pretty much the way Bill Clinton left them.

It's understandable then why Repugs wouldn't want this infiormation to come to light: it contradicts everything they've been saying since they stole their way into power. All their yammering about duct tape and visqueen and weapons of mass destruction was simply a ploy to control us with fear. Thank Goddess their lies have finally been exposed. We can all sleep soundly tonight knowing that in spite of Bush's best efforts, the so-called "terrorist threat" warrants about as much attention today that President Clinton gave it when he was in charge
http://blamebush.typepad.com/