PDA

View Full Version : Study: 1 in 3 americans implanted with RFID chip many unaware



revelarts
02-24-2016, 09:00 PM
Analysis of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chip Prevalence in 3 Discrete United States Populations
"Our work has shown that approximately 1 in 3 individuals in the United States is carrying an RFID microchip. Our sample size was sufficiently large (n=2955) and was spread throughout three distinct geographic regions."


Why the Heck are so many "Conspiracy Theories" becoming FACTS?!
I don't like it!!
someone please debunk this for me. Or tell me it's all just stupid volunteers or something.... 1 in 3 ...

http://nationalreport.net/study-finds-1-3-americans-implanted-rfid-chips-unaware/


Scientists at the Wyoming Institute of Technology (WIT) have determined that a shocking 1 in 3 Americans has been implanted with an RFID microchip. In an article published this week (http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/), they detail a study of nearly 3000 individuals, in which they identified nearly 1000 individuals that had been implanted with an RFID chip. Most were unaware that they had been implanted with such a chip. This finding comes amongst increasing predictions that RFID chip implantation will become common place in the next decade.
Lead scientist on the study, John Brugle, Ph.D. offered the following:



We were motivated to perform this study by all of the public interest in RFID implantation and fears that it would be common place. It turns out, in fact, that it is already common place. We found that a shockingly high number of Americans are carrying RFID implants in their body. The overwhelming majority of these individuals were completely unaware that they had been implanted. I hope that this study causes us to take pause as a society and truly consider the ramifications and implications of human RFID implantation.

The study looked both at the prevalence of RFID implantation, as well as the common implantation locations. In addition to commonly known implantation sites, such as the back of the hand, they also identified many RFID chips that had been implanted in dental fillings. The function of the chips varied, but the authors of the study indicated that many revealed personal identities, including social security numbers, as well as medical records. The best way to determine if you have been implanted with an RFID chip is to consult a qualified medical professional to administer a full body scan with an RFID reader. Concerned citizens can also attempt a self scan, but civilian grade scanners (https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11828) are not always sensitive enough to detect implanted RFID chips.

-

We were motivated to perform this study by all of the public interest in RFID implantation and fears that it would be common place. It turns out, in fact, that it is already common place. We found that a shockingly high number of Americans are carrying RFID implants in their body. The overwhelming majority of these individuals were completely unaware that they had been implanted. I hope that this study causes us to take pause as a society and truly consider the ramifications and implications of human RFID implantation.

The study looked both at the prevalence of RFID implantation, as well as the common implantation locations. In addition to commonly known implantation sites, such as the back of the hand, they also identified many RFID chips that had been implanted in dental fillings. The function of the chips varied, but the authors of the study indicated that many revealed personal identities, including social security numbers, as well as medical records. The best way to determine if you have been implanted with an RFID chip is to consult a qualified medical professional to administer a full body scan with an RFID reader. Concerned citizens can also attempt a self scan, but civilian grade scanners (https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11828) are not always sensitive enough to detect implanted RFID chips. - See more at: http://nationalreport.net/study-finds-1-3-americans-implanted-rfid-chips-unaware/#sthash.fuI8BaPR.dpuf



<tbody>
Analysis of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chip Prevalence in 3 Discrete United States Populations - WIT (http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/)


By John Brugle, Ph.D. on June 8, 2014
John T. Brugle, Ph.D and Mary Franz, Ph.D, M.P.H.
Wyoming Institute of Technology, Human Studies Division
ePUB Ahead of Print

Abstract
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chips have been used extensively in wildlife ecology and conservation to identify and track individual specimens in a population. It has been unknown, however, how often RFID chips have been implanted in human populations for the tracking and identification of individuals. This study analyzed the prevalence of RFID Chips in 3 geographically discrete populations and found that, on average, 1 in 3 individuals carried an RFID Chip. Interestingly, there was a strong correlation with RFID Chip presence and previous dental work.

Materials and Methods
Populations
Three discrete human populations, defined by geographic location, were assessed for the presence of RFID Chips.

Population Midwest (MW) contained 958 individuals from Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Population Northeast (NE) contained 987 individuals from Maine, Rhode Island, and New Jersey. Population South West (SW) contained 1,010 individuals from Arizona and Nevada. Volunteers were recruited using standard methods and compensated in a manner consistent with industry standards. All test subjects were treated in compliance with institutional codes of ethics and standards.

RFID Scanning
Individuals were subjected to full body RFID Chips scanning using previously detailed protocols. Test subjects were scanned either in the nude or in minimal undergarments to avoid interference.

Demographic and Personal History Screening
Test subjects provided demographic and personal history, including medical history, through standard forms. All personal and medical information was coded in a double blind manner to protect privacy, in compliance with institutional standards.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed and visualized using R. Significance cut offs were set at p=0.01. Complete description of the statistical packages used can be accessed in the supplementary material.


Results
In total, 997 RFID positive individuals were identified out of 2955 individuals screened. This corresponds to roughly 1 in 3 individuals screened, as shown in Figure 1. Individual frequency by region can be seen in Figure 2.
Additionally, tooth fillings were identified as the predominant location for RFID chips. Fifty seven percent of RFID chips identified were located in tooth fillings. Additional RFID locations and their prevalence can be seen in Figure 3.

Discussion
Our work has shown that approximately 1 in 3 individuals in the United States is carrying an RFID microchip. Our sample size was sufficiently large (n=2955) and was spread throughout three distinct geographic regions. Thus, we are comfortable extrapolating our finding to the broader American population.

Intriguingly, the most frequently identified location for an RFID microchip was in tooth fillings. This is contrary to popularly held belief that RFID chips are inserted in the dorsal of the hand near the thumb. More investigation is required to understand the significance of this finding. - See more at: Analysis of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chip Prevalence in 3 Discrete United States Populations - WIT (http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/#sthash.oLHVGzVc.dpuf)

</tbody>

hmmm, yessss "more research is needed".... YEAH THINK?!
WTH!


http://d1nt4a7y8dwdsx.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/rfid-300x185.jpg
http://witscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Slide3.jpg

Perianne
02-24-2016, 09:22 PM
The world is becoming an increasingly scary place.

revelarts
02-24-2016, 10:17 PM
OK... false alarm it is fake..

http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/microchip2.asp

NightTrain
02-24-2016, 10:27 PM
This should answer your question about being legit, Rev. Read the staff bios.

http://nationalreport.net/staff/

Drummond
02-25-2016, 09:10 AM
OK... false alarm it is fake..

http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/microchip2.asp

... what .... REALLY ??? :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::rolleyes:

Perianne
02-25-2016, 09:12 AM
What will be really scary is if they could implant something to show what someone is thinking.

indago
02-26-2016, 09:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSiFXhrxE3Y