Supreme Court Blocks Obama Immigration Plan

[Elessar]

He has been overstepping his Constitutionally prescribed boundaries for
7.5 years.

This is a true Smack-down:

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/23/u-s-supreme-court-split-4-4-blocks-obama-immigration-plan/21400778/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D-16597140_htmlws-main-bb

[Black Diamond]

He has been overstepping his Constitutionally prescribed boundaries for
7.5 years.

This is a true Smack-down:

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/23/u-s-supreme-court-split-4-4-blocks-obama-immigration-plan/21400778/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D-16597140_htmlws-main-bb

Way overdue imo.

[Bilgerat]

Way overdue imo.

I concur!

As I see things, the US Constitution has won two in a row.
1st when the Senate voted against "secret" lists vs due process
2nd when the ruling against the illegal power grab by "El Jefe" regarding immigration was upheld.

[Gunny]

He has been overstepping his Constitutionally prescribed boundaries for
7.5 years.

This is a true Smack-down:

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/23/u-s-supreme-court-split-4-4-blocks-obama-immigration-plan/21400778/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D-16597140_htmlws-main-bb

Is THAT why he was whining tears all over my TV this morning? I was wondering what he was prattling on about. That dude is the biggest crybaby in the world when he doesn't get his way.

[fj1200]

He has been overstepping his Constitutionally prescribed boundaries for
7.5 years.

This is a true Smack-down:


Barely. It was a 4-4 decision meaning the tie went to the lower court.

[Gunny]

Barely. It was a 4-4 decision meaning the tie went to the lower court.

Are you say the Supreme Court rejected to hear the case? That's the only way it get's kicked down.

[Kathianne]

Are you say the Supreme Court rejected to hear the case? That's the only way it get's kicked down.

Nope, the tie with the 8 member court, let's the last ruling stand. If Scalia was still there the tie wouldn't have been a tie.

[fj1200]

Nope, the tie with the 8 member court, let's the last ruling stand. If Scalia was still there the tie wouldn't have been a tie.

Exactly. Even if he were a 5-4 decision still wouldn't be a smack down.

[Gunny]

Nope, the tie with the 8 member court, let's the last ruling stand. If Scalia was still there the tie wouldn't have been a tie.

I stand corrected. All the more reason to not let the Dem's appoint the next Justice.