PDA

View Full Version : Jim's Hurt, Pro-Trump Folks Need To Get Out There



Kathianne
08-03-2016, 10:15 AM
Been a bad week now for Team Trump. First Khans, now he tried to dis Ryan, McCain, and Ayotte. Blow back.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/290179-trump-memo-calls-for-urgent-pivot-from-khan-controversy


Trump memo calls for ‘urgent pivot’ from Khan controversy By Scott Wong (http://thehill.com/author/scott-wong) - 08/02/16 04:13 PM EDT
Donald Trump (http://thehill.com/people/donald-trump)’s campaign sent out an email to surrogates this week titled “URGENT PIVOT” as the campaign seeks to control the damage from Trump’s war of words with the parents of a Muslim U.S. Army captain killed in Iraq.

The memo, obtained by The Hill, asks surrogates on Capitol Hill to coordinate messaging and push back on attacks on Trump.




“All — As usual, the media is working against our efforts and our messaging specifically as it relates to the tragic death of Capt. Humayun Khan,” Scott Mason, Trump’s director of congressional affairs, wrote.

“We are asking you to review and use the attached talking points in your daily messaging, including a release and/or statements you can put out in your social media immediately to support Mr. Trump and OUR message, that we must end radical Islamic terror so that soldiers like Capt. Khan, and all Americans, will be safe.”

Trump has faced an enormous backlash from Democrats, military and veterans groups, and even many prominent Republicans after he went after Khizr and Ghazala Khan on Twitter and in TV interviews in recent days.

Both appeared on stage at last week’s Democratic National Convention, challenging Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims entering the country. Khizr Khan asked the GOP nominee if he had ever read the Constitution while dramatically pulling a pocket version of the founding document from his jacket.

Mason’s email, which was also sent to Trump aides including Rick Dearborn, MacKenzie Smith, Jeff Freeland and Adnan Jalil, demonstrates how serious Trump’s team is treating fallout from the Khan controversy.

Retiring Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said Tuesday he would vote for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton (http://thehill.com/people/hillary-clinton) after Trump blasted the Khans. Sally Bradshaw, a top aide to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, said Trump's attacks motivated her to leave the Republican Party.

And Sen. John McCain (http://thehill.com/people/john-mccain) (R-Ariz.), a war hero who spent years in a Vietnam prisoner-of-war camp, issued a powerful statement saying Trump’s attacks “do not represent the views of our Republican Party, its officers, or candidates.”

Gold Star families should be “off limits,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus declared.

In the attached talking points, the Trump campaign provided transcripts of interviews Trump had given about the Khans and argued that the businessman’s comments had been misconstrued by the media. The talking points stated:

“Mr. Trump was asked about Mr. Khan’s comments during the DNC, and he replied that he wished him well.

“Many in the media reported falsely that Trump had compared his sacrifices to Mr. Khan’s son which is completely false and the transcripts show that to be true.

“Mr. Trump wants to end radical Islamic terror, so that our soldiers like Mr. Khan’s son will be safe.”

The four-page memo also contained talking points blaming the policies of President Obama and Clinton for Russian aggression; accusing Clinton of treating the State Department like her personal hedge fund; drawing attention to the email leak at the Democratic National Committee; and attacking last week’s Democratic convention.

“We will be summarizing all supporting statements for NY and Mr. Trump to see this evening, so please act now and send us a copy/share whatever you're able to post,” Mason wrote in his email to dozens of Capitol Hill surrogates. “Thanks for your continued support. Welcome to August.”



Oh, this:

http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/rcp-trump-clinton.jpg

Kathianne
08-03-2016, 10:44 AM
All over the sites I visit, a conglomeration of blogs, newsites from right and left, some messageboards, social media the pro-Trump forces are suddenly quiet though a few are addressing the 'conspiracy' to deny Trump from explaining. Weird. He was on Hannity last night, he was the one to bring up his not endorsing folks that didn't ask for his endorsement basically saying they didn't want it either.

Then Lewandowski gets out on CNN platform and brings up Obama not being a US citizen, Harvard transcripts, etc.

Who could have seen this coming?

Thanks to Obama's cunning call to 'dump Trump' coupled with Trump's non-endorsements, rapidly falling support outside his core, things are likely to turn very ugly.

Looks like the GOP may want to take back that title from the Trump Party, but the lesson will still be that it's the party that actually is likely to lose to Hillary Clinton.

Kathianne
08-03-2016, 10:53 AM
The strongest voice I respect that went for Trump from the beginning is doing what he can, but is seeing some issues:

https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/08/02/trump-v-trump/?singlepage=true


Trump v. Trump: Can Donald Save Himself and America?
BY ROGER L SIMON (https://pjmedia.com/columnist/roger-l-simon) AUGUST 2, 2016




The way things are going in this country and the world—the worst U.S. economic recovery since 1949 (http://freebeacon.com/issues/obama-economy-slowest-recovery-since-1949/), hideously-violent Islamic terrorism metastasizing (http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/when-will-our-politicians-accept-the-reality-of-islamic-terrorism/) across the globe on a daily basis, an appalling epidemic of police assassinations, an opponent who was branded a pathological liar in 1996 (http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html) and has proven that assertion multiple times to the present day (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/01/clinton-fact-checked-on-truthful-claim-in-email-scandal.html) with even more of her treachery yet to be exposed (https://wikileaks.org/plusd/?qproject[]=cg&q=&qfdestination=Secretary+of+State&qfoclass=CONFIDENTIAL&qtfrom=2009-01-10&qsort=tdesc#result)—Donald Trump should be winning the election by acclamation.
But at this moment he appears to be floundering, losing as much or more ground than he gains by engaging in self-destructive personal battles he should never have participated in in the first place. Even when he is right, these fights accomplish nothing and almost always hurt the larger cause, allowing the media to paint him as racist, sexist or, most importantly to them, unfit to lead.


They would do so if he were St. Francis of Assisi, of course. Former Democratic pollster Pat Caddell calls pro-Clinton media bias a "terrifying crisis in democracy (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/pat-caddell-pro-clinton-media-bias-terrifying-crisis-democracy/)" for good reason. But Trump should know better than to give that media the chance to exercise that bias by naively playing into the hands of the likes of George Stephanopoulos (http://freebeacon.com/politics/stephanopoulos-fails-disclose-donations-clinton-interview/) and The New York Times.


It's his old signal to noise (https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/06/07/trumps-signal-to-noise-problem/) problem I wrote about earlier coupled with the most juvenile narcissism. And, tragically for all his supporters, not to mention the country, it doesn't appear to be getting any better.

Driven by private demons, Trump is on the verge of betraying all of us. He says repeatedly he is leading a movement, but he acts like a man off by himself, tilting at windmills. Though different in specifics, the controversies surrounding Khizr Khan and Judge Curiel both have that characteristic. In both cases, he shouldn't have gone there.


Trump—to his credit—has also said repeatedly that if he fails to win the presidency, his entire candidacy was not worth the time, money or effort. He's right, but it is worse than that. He took other more conventional politicians off the playing field who may have been able to defeat the wounded Clinton. For that reason Trump has a special responsibility now. He has to discipline himself as never before to succeed.


Can he do it? Many say it's unlikely and it's easy to see why. I'm agnostic—but hopeful.

...

Kathianne
08-03-2016, 11:49 AM
It's a bad day when Drudge has no good news for Trump. Best he can do is dis Ryan, which isn't really working for Trump. There comes a time to stop digging, which was 5 days ago.