PDA

View Full Version : Homeland eyes special declaration to take charge of elections



jimnyc
08-30-2016, 06:28 PM
Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a "critical infrastructure," giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

"We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid," Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

"There's a vital national interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure," he said at media conference earlier this month hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592

Kathianne
08-30-2016, 06:41 PM
I would think the simplest way to deal with this problem is just to print up paper ballots. Then the only issue is watching the counters, something both parties well know how to do.

jimnyc
08-30-2016, 07:04 PM
I would think the simplest way to deal with this problem is just to print up paper ballots. Then the only issue is watching the counters, something both parties well know how to do.

I agree. It may suck to go backwards in time, but it's much harder to hack or change votes with the paper ballots. Spend a little more $$ and have more people involved if necessary to ensure no messing around and the most transparency.

aboutime
08-30-2016, 07:15 PM
IT IS ENTIRELY "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.

But then. Since when does Obama, or any of his followers follow the constitution, or listen to Congress???

Kathianne
08-30-2016, 07:16 PM
I agree. It may suck to go backwards in time, but it's much harder to hack or change votes with the paper ballots. Spend a little more $$ and have more people involved if necessary to ensure no messing around and the most transparency.

I don't think it would cost more, likely less as most are volunteers. It would take longer and special attention needs to be given to urban areas. Chicago for instance, has serious problems finding GOP vote counters and observers.

Gunny
08-30-2016, 07:24 PM
IT IS ENTIRELY "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.

But then. Since when does Obama, or any of his followers follow the constitution, or listen to Congress???


I don't disagree with any of you on this one. Go back to paper ballots. And monitoring voting is definitely unconstitutional in my book.