PDA

View Full Version : BOMBSHELL: Clinton Foundation Donors Expected 'Benefits In Return For Gifts'



jimnyc
10-14-2016, 01:09 PM
Just more stuff for the Hillary supporters to ignore. Corruption in the highest possible levels of our government is acceptable to them.

-----

BOMBSHELL: Clinton Foundation Donors Expected 'Benefits In Return For Gifts'

An independent “governance review” conducted by a prominent law firm that specializes in philanthropic issues concluded in December 2010 that the Clinton Foundation had a weak, rubber stamp board of directors and that many of its donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”

The blistering review — made public Thursday by WikiLeaks — described a tax-exempt public foundation with none of the independent oversight required under federal charity law. The Clinton Foundation reported $187 million in net assets in 2011.

The decision to conduct the review was bitterly opposed by Bill Clinton’s long-time friends and political advisers.

The review was conducted by the New York law firm of Simpson Thacher and was requested by Chelsea Clinton who had profound misgivings about the operation of her parent’s foundation. Leading the review was Victoria Bjorklund, one of the nation’s top-ranked legal experts on good-governance practices for foundations and charities. She came out of retirement to lead the review.

Rest here - http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/14/bombshell-clinton-foundation-donors-expected-benefits-in-return-for-gifts/

Elessar
10-14-2016, 02:24 PM
More poop on them?

How much deeper can they be mired in it?

aboutime
10-16-2016, 06:28 PM
Does QUID PRO QUO ring any bells???

quid pro quo
ˌkwid ˌprō ˈkwō/
noun
a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something.
"the pardon was a quid pro quo for their help in releasing hostages"
synonyms: exchange, trade, trade-off, swap, switch, barter, substitute, reciprocation, return;