PDA

View Full Version : Iranian 'Trial Run' On US Ship Attack?



Kathianne
01-31-2017, 06:13 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/31/exclusive-pentagon-believes-attack-on-saudi-frigate-meant-for-us-warship.html


The Iranian-backed suicide attack targeting a Saudi frigate off the coast of Yemen on Monday may have been meant for an American warship, two defense officials told Fox News.

The incident in question occurred in the southern Red Sea and was carried out by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. Two Saudi sailors were killed and three were wounded. At first the ship was thought to have been struck by a missile.
...


I think there may be many tests, (like in the Ukraine) from friends and foes in the coming months.

Kathianne
01-31-2017, 06:18 PM
A bit more here:

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/01/31/report-attack-on-saudi-ship-may-have-been-intended-for-u-s-warship/

NightTrain
02-01-2017, 01:31 AM
Looking forward to Mad Dog instructing the US Navy to use a Phalanx on a couple of those boats. That'll end the foolishness.

Balu
02-01-2017, 02:12 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/31/exclusive-pentagon-believes-attack-on-saudi-frigate-meant-for-us-warship.html


The Iranian-backed suicide attack targeting a Saudi frigate off the coast of Yemen on Monday may have been meant for an American warship, two defense officials told Fox News.

The incident in question occurred in the southern Red Sea and was carried out by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. Two Saudi sailors were killed and three were wounded. At first the ship was thought to have been struck by a missile.
...

I think there may be many tests, (like in the Ukraine) from friends and foes in the coming months.
Paranoia and fear? Are there other links besides Foxnews?

Kathianne
02-01-2017, 02:19 AM
You like Reuters better? Tass didn't pop up in the search. Go figure! :rolleyes:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen-security-saudi-idUSKBN15E2KE

Balu
02-01-2017, 02:43 AM
You like Reuters better? Tass didn't pop up in the search. Go figure! :rolleyes:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen-security-saudi-idUSKBN15E2KE

Not considered. The same source.


The armed Houthi movement attacked a Saudi warship off the western coast of Yemen on Monday, causing an explosion that killed two crew members and injured three others, Saudi state news agency SPA reported.

Kathianne
02-01-2017, 02:46 AM
Not considered. The same source.

TASS and Saudi press are one in the same? Huh?

NightTrain
02-01-2017, 02:47 AM
Paranoia and fear? Are there other links besides Foxnews?

Well, that's where the "Exclusive" part from the Fox story comes in. The Pentagon is much more likely - especially with Trump as President - to talk to Fox news than the other news organizations.

From the story :




The incident in question occurred in the southern Red Sea and was carried out by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. Two Saudi sailors were killed and three were wounded. At first the ship was thought to have been struck by a missile.


But based on new analysis of a video showing the attack, American intelligence officials now believe this was, in fact, a suicide bomber whose small boat rammed the side of the Saudi vessel.


In the audio heard on the video, a voice narrating the attack shouts in Arabic, "Allahu akbar [God is great], death to America, death to Israel, a curse on the Jews and victory for Islam."

So, the audio provides insight as to what they thought they were attacking - an American warship.

But it seems to me that a Saudi flag would be easy to spot... but maybe one of our Navy veterans can chime in and tell us what the scoop is. My understanding is that a National Warship is always flying the country's colors, but I don't know that for sure.

I would think the terrorists can differentiate between a Saudi flag and an American flag.

Balu
02-01-2017, 05:09 AM
TASS and Saudi press are one in the same? Huh?
Any REPRINTED material despite of edition is the same source. This is evident.

Kathianne
02-01-2017, 08:27 AM
Any REPRINTED material despite of edition is the same source. This is evident.

:laugh2: