PDA

View Full Version : Iran Has Been Put ‘On Notice’; Time to Show U.S. Means Business



jimnyc
03-10-2017, 07:06 AM
I would next hit them with crippling sanctions. They are continuing to laugh at Obama's deal and do as they please and ignoring the international community. This is also time for the international community to come together as one, and handle issues like this diplomatically and responsibly. If not, no bitching down the road should things grow worse.

----

Iran Has Been Put ‘On Notice’; Time to Show U.S. Means Business

(CNSNews.com) – Iran’s provocations in the Persian Gulf and fresh ballistic missile tests indicate that the regime is testing the Trump administration and watching carefully to see whether and how it responds, policy analysts say.

On Thursday, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-affiliated Tasnim news agency reported that the IRGC in recent days “successfully” test-fired a sea-launched ballistic missile.

It cited IRGC Aerospace Division head Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh as saying the short-range Hormuz-2 missile had destroyed a floating target 250 kilometers (155 miles) away.

It is believed to be the first Iranian ballistic missile launch since the White House in early February declared that it was “officially putting Iran on notice,” following a previous ballistic missile launch which the U.S. said was in violation of the U.N. resolution adopted after the Iran nuclear deal.

The White House warning was followed by new designations of people and entities involved in the missile program and in supporting terrorism.

Since then, Iran has carried out other troubling actions including military exercises, and the test-firing of a cruise missile. (Unlike ballistic missiles, cruise missiles do not travel outside the atmosphere on route to their targets.)

Iranian vessels also have harassed U.S. Navy ships in the Persian Gulf – something Iran did on a number of occasions during the Obama administration.

A low point was reached in January last year, when the IRGC Navy apprehended and humiliated U.S. sailors after their patrol boats inadvertently entered Iran’s territorial waters.

Also frequently occurring during the Obama era were Iranian missile tests, including tests carried out after the nuclear deal was concluded.

----

Pointing to both recent naval provocations in the Gulf and missile tests, Tzvi Kahn, a senior policy analyst at the non-profit Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) in Washington, argued that “Tehran likely seeks to determine whether the new president will respond – or, more precisely, fail to respond – to its misbehavior at sea in the same manner as his predecessor.”

He said President Trump should respond by designating the IRGC as a foreign terrorist organization, preparing the way for further sanctions against an organization that is deeply involved in the Iranian economy.

“The White House should also make clear that further Iranian harassment of U.S. naval forces in the Gulf risks triggering a military response against the offending vessels,” Kahn said.

“The Trump administration has already put Iran ‘on notice.’ It must now demonstrate that those were not idle words.”

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior Iran analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said Thursday the regime in Tehran is clearly testing the Trump administration.

“A return to ballistic missile testing, whether covert or overt, signals Tehran intends to test the Trump administration’s limits, just as it did with its predecessor,” he wrote in a policy brief.

Rest here - http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/analysts-iran-has-been-put-notice-time-show-us-means-business

Balu
03-10-2017, 07:33 AM
– Iran’s provocations in the Persian Gulf and fresh ballistic missile tests indicate that the regime is testing the Trump administration and watching carefully to see whether and how it responds, policy analysts say. ...


Really? To my mind they just develop and modernize their Army - quite a natural action for ANY country for their self defense to be able to give an adequate reciprocal response to any enemy or prevent them from ill-considered steps. Some countries are able to afford such to themselves, some are not.

jimnyc
03-10-2017, 07:42 AM
Really? To my mind they just develop and modernize their Army - quite a natural action for ANY country for their self defense to be able to give an adequate reciprocal response to any enemy or prevent them from ill-considered steps. Some countries are able to afford such to themselves, some are not.

But they AGREED to a deal, and got their $400 million and other things in return, and sanctions lifted.... and the missiles and other provocations they are doing are explicitly banned as per what they agreed to.

Drummond
03-10-2017, 07:44 AM
Really? To my mind they just develop and modernize their Army - quite a natural action for ANY country for their self defense to be able to give an adequate reciprocal response to any enemy or prevent them from ill-considered steps. Some countries are able to afford such to themselves, some are not.

Yes, well, Russia tends to be very supportive of Iran, doesn't it ? You even aided them in their efforts to build their nuclear infrastructure !!

We in the West know Iran to be a world sponsor of terrorism ... very possibly the most major sponsor anywhere on the planet. Also, when Ahmadinejad was in power, he repeatedly called for Israel to be wiped off the map.

Now, Ahmadinejad may no longer wield power in Iran, but have any of his successors expressed any regret for those holocaustal threats ? OR, are they instead just moving ahead with their efforts to back their belligerence with greater firepower capabilities ??

There are those nations on the world stage who behave responsibly. Then, there are rogue nations who delight in the very opposite. Iran is in the latter camp.

Is Russia STILL assisting them ? Do tell us, Balu.

Balu
03-10-2017, 07:51 AM
But they AGREED to a deal, and got their $400 million and other things in return, and sanctions lifted.... and the missiles and other provocations they are doing are explicitly banned as per what they agreed to.
True.
But, the situation around Iran has changed and in such a case ANY country may feel free from previous obligations.
The same thing is with Russia. Me personally, I approve the deployment of our missiles with nuke warheads close to the borders of NATO countries in response to their increasing their presence near our boarders.
I am not speaking weather it is good or bad. I am speaking about the logic of actions.