PDA

View Full Version : Hillary and Podesta's Troubling Ties to Russia



jimnyc
03-29-2017, 03:55 PM
And the ping pong table continues to go back and forth.

-----

RussiaGate: Hillary Clinton and John Podesta's Troubling Ties to Russia

Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of “Clinton Cash,” explained on Fox News Tuesday how a Russia connection to the Clinton campaign and Obama presidency is much bigger and more troubling than anything Democrats have accused Team Trump of.

During his appearance on “Fox & Friends,” Schweizer alleged that Clinton campaign chair John Podesta probably violated federal law when he failed to disclose his stock holdings in a Kremlin-funded company.

“In 2011, John Podesta joins the board of this very small energy company called Joule Energy based out of Massachusetts," Schweizer said. "About two months after he joins the board, a Russian entity called Rusnano puts a billion rubles -- which is about 35 million dollars -- into John Podesta’s company. Now, what is Rusnano? Rusnano is not a private company, Steve. It is a fund directly funded by the Kremlin. In fact, the Russian science minister called Rusnano Putin’s child. So you have the Russian government investing in one of John Podesta’s businesses in 2011, while he is an advisor to Hillary Clinton at the State Department.”

"Does anyone in Trump's circle rise to the level where there's this kind of money involved?" asked host Steve Doocy.

Schweizer answered that he hadn't seen anything like that yet. "Nobody that has an advisory role in the White House has had this money exchange. And certainly the money hasn't exchanged as far as we know while they have been advising the president," he said, pointing out that while he was an advisor in the Obama White House, Podesta owned stock shares with "Putin's Child" and failed to disclose it.

“So then in 2013, he goes to the White House, to be a special counselor to Barack Obama, and that requires that you, you know, have financial disclosures every year," he explained. "In his financial disclosure form in 2013, he not only fails to disclose these 75,000 shares of stock that he has in Joule Energy, which is funded in part by the Russian government. He also fails to disclose that he is on one of the three corporate boards that this entity has. It’s got this very complex ownership structure. He discloses he is on the company in Massachusetts, that is he on the board of a company in the Netherlands, but he fails to disclose that he is also on the executive board of the holding company. That’s a clear violation of the disclosure rules that I think needs to be looked at.”

He added, “What makes the Podesta case clear is there was a transfer of money and there was a transfer of a lot of money that stood to make John Podesta a lot of money. That is unique and that’s extremely troubling because at the time that transfer is taking place he is advising Hillary Clinton at the State Department. We know that from the Podesta emails that he is helping her make personnel decisions, speech decisions, policy decisions. He is meeting with her monthly. It’s a transfer of money from a foreign government, at the time that he is advising America’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton.”

Rest here - https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/29/russiagate-hillary-clinton-and-john-podestas-troubling-ties-to-russia/

Kathianne
03-29-2017, 04:09 PM
Yep, they should be careful with their 'investigations,' as it certainly appears there is no difference, perhaps even more on their side.

pete311
03-29-2017, 04:53 PM
Only matters if she were president. She is not, so no one cares.

Kathianne
03-29-2017, 04:54 PM
Only matters if she were president. She is not, so no one cares.

Yeah, they will. If we're looking at 'Russian interference.'

jimnyc
03-29-2017, 05:04 PM
Only matters if she were president. She is not, so no one cares.

So she and Podesta could have done absolutely anything during the election, and it wouldn't have mattered as she didn't win the election? I don't buy that. And I also think, they tried to sink Trump with a lot of this Russian stuff, as far back as trying to gather information on him at the towers. Obama's assistant DHS chief or whatever just admitted on MSNBC yesterday that they did in fact purposely monitor him (I know, shock at this point). I think they tried to do some sabotaging and failed. Then next they tried with the blame game, and it's failing. And as the leads are followed, there is more evidence of hanky panky between various Dems and Russia than Trump.

jimnyc
03-29-2017, 05:22 PM
Evelyn Farkas spills the beans

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

The former Obama administration official who admitted earlier this month that her former colleagues tried to secretly gather intelligence on President Trump’s team was no low-level staffer.

Evelyn Farkas was once considered the most senior policy officer for Russia within the Pentagon, and she is now apparently defending the leaks that have been coming out of the Trump White House.

Now an MSNBC analyst and senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, Farkas has "advised three secretaries of defense on Russia policy," according to a senior defense official quoted in Politico. She has served on the Council on Foreign Relations and the Senate Armed Services Committee, among others, and was executive director of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism in 2008-2009.

In an appearance on MSNBC earlier this month, Farkas told Mika Brezinski about her role in the efforts to collect intelligence on Trump’s team, and their alleged ties with Russia, in the Obama adminstration’s final days.

“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill... get as much information as you can," Farkas said, adding that her big fear was "if [Trump staffers] found out how we knew what we knew about their ... the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

At the end of the interview, Farkas said, "we have good intelligence on Russia... that's why you have the leaking. People are worried."

Farkas was responding to a report in The New York Times suggesting the "Obama Administration Rushed to Preserve Intelligence of Russian Election Hacking."

Rest here - http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/29/who-is-obama-administration-official-who-spilled-beans.html

gabosaurus
03-29-2017, 08:10 PM
Hillary -- not President of the United States.
Podesta -- also not President of the United States.

The right-wing media is throwing up a lot of smoke screens on this one.

aboutime
03-29-2017, 09:09 PM
Hillary -- not President of the United States.
Podesta -- also not President of the United States.

The right-wing media is throwing up a lot of smoke screens on this one.


gabby. Funny how you, and other liberals always try to disguise being presented with the truth, by declaring it's a smoke screen. Tell us WHICH right wing media outlets you are talking about...other than...as you will say...FOX?
It's really sad how YOU give Obama, and Hillary a PASS, and want to ignore all of the Lies, and Law breaking they have done.

Abbey Marie
03-30-2017, 09:20 AM
The left loves to champion a Kumbaya version of world cultures and flexible borders. Why should they care if anyone is chummy with the Russians?

I hope so so very much that the OP info has legs. One big slam to the mat of these Dem vipers and their attempts to hurt Trump any way they can. If they actually hurt themselves more in the process, the joy would be incredible.

jimnyc
03-30-2017, 04:07 PM
Hillary -- not President of the United States.
Podesta -- also not President of the United States.

The right-wing media is throwing up a lot of smoke screens on this one.

One doesn't get a free pass just because they are Losers.

gabosaurus
03-30-2017, 05:04 PM
I am not issuing a free pass. I just don't see how it is important at this moment. Clinton is a private citizen. What she did in the past is no longer an issue. What Trump did in Russia IS an issue, because he is President of the United States. Everyone knows Hillary was a crook and a fraud. It was a contributing factor in her losing the election. But that has no bearing no. And this story is TOTALLY a smoke screen.

jimnyc
03-30-2017, 05:11 PM
I am not issuing a free pass. I just don't see how it is important at this moment. Clinton is a private citizen. What she did in the past is no longer an issue. What Trump did in Russia IS an issue, because he is President of the United States. Everyone knows Hillary was a crook and a fraud. It was a contributing factor in her losing the election. But that has no bearing no. And this story is TOTALLY a smoke screen.

And yet every single person, democrats alike, have said they found nothing regarding Trump. IF Podesta or Hillary were up to no good, simply being losers doesn't mean things shouldn't be investigated.

Does any worry about foreign countries being somehow connected/involved with our elections system go out the window depending on who won/lost? And we won't know the totality of what took place unless they get investigated just the same, as more and more news like this comes out about them. Just as Trump was and is being fully investigated to 100% ensure our political process wasn't abused - it too should be ensured the same from the other side. IF they did anything illegal, and then lost the election anyway, I would still want them held accountable.

gabosaurus
03-30-2017, 05:26 PM
Every single investigator from every agency found Hillary to not be involved in any illegal act involving her computer and server, but right-wing folks still believe she is guilty and should be prosecuted. It is like the bitter left-wing faction that still wants GW Bush prosecuted for lying to Congress and for crimes against humanity. Once again, it's all a diversion to the investigation into Trump's ties with Russia.

jimnyc
03-30-2017, 05:43 PM
Every single investigator from every agency found Hillary to not be involved in any illegal act involving her computer and server, but right-wing folks still believe she is guilty and should be prosecuted. It is like the bitter left-wing faction that still wants GW Bush prosecuted for lying to Congress and for crimes against humanity. Once again, it's all a diversion to the investigation into Trump's ties with Russia.

You're still blind. Comey DID find her wrong in every aspect, but chose not to prosecute. Find ANYONE that worked for or still works for the government and they'll all tell you the same. She simply got away with breaking the law is all, and on the grandest stage. She's the OJ of politics.

But none of that has to do with any ties and/or wrongdoing between her or anyone on her team with Russia. If she or they don't, then they'll be absolved. But they don't get to avoid investigation or worse, just because they have L's on their foreheads.

aboutime
03-30-2017, 07:06 PM
Every single investigator from every agency found Hillary to not be involved in any illegal act involving her computer and server, but right-wing folks still believe she is guilty and should be prosecuted. It is like the bitter left-wing faction that still wants GW Bush prosecuted for lying to Congress and for crimes against humanity. Once again, it's all a diversion to the investigation into Trump's ties with Russia.


You're really funny gabby. You are so good at repeating LIBERAL LIES; a stranger to DP, reading your words might believe YOU worked for either OBAMA, or HILLARY.

Time for you to read the 2017, updated version of the DNC Talking Points Manual on "How to Convince yourself YOUR LIES are TRUE".