PDA

View Full Version : Scientific Study: Journalists Are a Bunch of Drunks With Sub-Average Brain Function



Neo
05-19-2017, 09:17 PM
THIS......is why we endure the frenetic s of the special people.

In the wake of yesterday's more nuanced piece of press criticism, and in light of the Harvard study Lauretta wrote up earlier (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2017/05/19/harvard-study-media-coverage-of-trumps-first-100-days-80-negative-sets-new-standard-compared-to-past-3-presidents-n2329249), it felt like a bit of trolling might be in order. If you missed her post, she highlighted the findings of a review conducted by researchers at the prominent Ivy League university regarding media coverage of President Trump's first 100 days in office. Unsurprisingly, Trump set a new record (https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald-trumps-first-100-days/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=ab6d830a9d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_19&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-ab6d830a9d-189799085) for negativity, with eight out of every ten stories about his administration framed in a negative manner. This far exceeded the hostility encountered by his three immediate predecessors -- especially Barack Obama, who was the only recent president upon whom the news media showered majority-positive coverage. Trump complained this week that he's been treated more unfairly (http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/politics/trump-coast-guard-speech/) than any politician in history.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/05/19/study-do-journalists-brains-function-at-a-lower-level-than-average-people-n2329307

Gunny
05-19-2017, 09:22 PM
THIS......is why we endure the frenetic s of the special people.

In the wake of yesterday's more nuanced piece of press criticism, and in light of the Harvard study Lauretta wrote up earlier (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2017/05/19/harvard-study-media-coverage-of-trumps-first-100-days-80-negative-sets-new-standard-compared-to-past-3-presidents-n2329249), it felt like a bit of trolling might be in order. If you missed her post, she highlighted the findings of a review conducted by researchers at the prominent Ivy League university regarding media coverage of President Trump's first 100 days in office. Unsurprisingly, Trump set a new record (https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald-trumps-first-100-days/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=ab6d830a9d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_19&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-ab6d830a9d-189799085) for negativity, with eight out of every ten stories about his administration framed in a negative manner. This far exceeded the hostility encountered by his three immediate predecessors -- especially Barack Obama, who was the only recent president upon whom the news media showered majority-positive coverage. Trump complained this week that he's been treated more unfairly (http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/politics/trump-coast-guard-speech/) than any politician in history.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/05/19/study-do-journalists-brains-function-at-a-lower-level-than-average-people-n2329307
Needed a study to figure that one out, huh?

Neo
05-19-2017, 09:50 PM
Needed a study to figure that one out, huh?

I KNOW.....go figure?:laugh2:

happyrepublican
06-08-2017, 03:52 AM
The bias against Trump beats all I've ever seen, by far. He's completely cracked the MSM and leftists in general.